case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2018-12-15 04:26 pm

[ SECRET POST #4354 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4364 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 48 secrets from Secret Submission Post #625.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
greghousesgf: (Jeeves Awesome)

Re: What controversial fandom opinions do you have?

[personal profile] greghousesgf 2018-12-15 11:25 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't for one minute believe the idea that some '80s style slasher movie directors have insisted that the "virgin survives" trope is unintentional (the same one mocked in Cabin in the Woods).
I think "muggle" is derogatory.
I think a lot of TV writers have a problem with women in authority.
I think the British version of the Office is funnier than the US one.
I think Dancing with Myself and I Touch Myself are songs about masturbating.
I think Blueblood is Luna's son.
I think the Great Pumpkin was intended to be an in joke about religious differences, even though Schulz said it wasn't.
I think Velma is probably straight because very few lesbians would let Fred order them around.
philstar22: (Default)

Re: What controversial fandom opinions do you have?

[personal profile] philstar22 2018-12-15 11:28 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh man, so agree with you on tv writers and women in authority. Even when a woman is the boss, she always has to show deference to a man in some way or be shown to be weak in some way.
greghousesgf: (Bertie ?!)

Re: What controversial fandom opinions do you have?

[personal profile] greghousesgf 2018-12-15 11:30 pm (UTC)(link)
or act crazy and/or bitchy
philstar22: (Default)

Re: What controversial fandom opinions do you have?

[personal profile] philstar22 2018-12-15 11:35 pm (UTC)(link)
Yup.

Re: What controversial fandom opinions do you have?

(Anonymous) 2018-12-15 11:31 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't for one minute believe the idea that some '80s style slasher movie directors have insisted that the "virgin survives" trope is unintentional (the same one mocked in Cabin in the Woods).

I think it was probably intentional for some, but not for all?

I think "muggle" is derogatory.

How?
greghousesgf: (Bertie Smile)

Re: What controversial fandom opinions do you have?

[personal profile] greghousesgf 2018-12-15 11:34 pm (UTC)(link)
it really comes off as "we are better than these people" to me. it's slightly more polite than "mudblood" but that's it.

Re: What controversial fandom opinions do you have?

(Anonymous) 2018-12-15 11:36 pm (UTC)(link)
All it says to me is that wizards and muggles are different. And they are different, I'm not sure how you can really get around that, no matter what term you use.
greghousesgf: (Bertie's Mouth)

Re: What controversial fandom opinions do you have?

[personal profile] greghousesgf 2018-12-15 11:39 pm (UTC)(link)
I might be more inclined to think that if I could remember any character calling themselves a muggle.

Re: What controversial fandom opinions do you have?

(Anonymous) 2018-12-15 11:43 pm (UTC)(link)
But we don't really see very many muggle characters, do we, especially not ones who know about magic. And people are obviously willing to call themselves "Muggle-born" or call their parents and loved ones Muggles...

IDK, I just kind of feel like I don't see what else they could have done instead. No matter what word you use for "non-wizard" the problem is still going to exist.
greghousesgf: (Boingboing)

Re: What controversial fandom opinions do you have?

[personal profile] greghousesgf 2018-12-15 11:47 pm (UTC)(link)
that's kind of my point. We don't see many of them because they are not considered important enough to the books' worldview to even be told what's going on. And magic is something one is born with in that world and can't be acquired, just harnessed by people who already have it.

Re: What controversial fandom opinions do you have?

(Anonymous) 2018-12-15 11:49 pm (UTC)(link)
Hmmm, I definitely get where you're coming from there, but that seems like a much deeper (and really interesting) problem with the series as a whole at that point!
tabaqui: (Default)

Re: What controversial fandom opinions do you have?

[personal profile] tabaqui 2018-12-16 03:37 am (UTC)(link)
Huh, really?
I think they're not in the books because the books are about wizards, particularly child wizards in a super-secret, very protected school, with a wizard government that's paranoid and hell-bent on no non-magical 'muggles' knowing about them.

Re: What controversial fandom opinions do you have?

(Anonymous) 2018-12-16 12:16 am (UTC)(link)
I see it as similar to hippies calling people "squares" or SCA folks referring to "mundanes," which is to say, not derogatory but not entirely neutral.

Re: What controversial fandom opinions do you have?

(Anonymous) 2018-12-16 12:21 am (UTC)(link)
I see what you're saying, but it seems to me like the distinction between muggles and wizards is way more real and fundamental than either of those things? Being able to do magic is kind of different from choosing to dress up on weekends and hit each other with foam swords.

Re: What controversial fandom opinions do you have?

(Anonymous) 2018-12-15 11:49 pm (UTC)(link)
I Touch Myself IS about masturbation.

And I never thought about Velma as a straight girl but now I think your opinion is the correct one.

Re: What controversial fandom opinions do you have?

(Anonymous) 2018-12-15 11:50 pm (UTC)(link)
I Touch Myself IS about masturbation.

Lol right? I'm confused about how that's controversial, haha. Had no idea there's any other way to interpret the song.
greghousesgf: (House Schroeder)

Re: What controversial fandom opinions do you have?

[personal profile] greghousesgf 2018-12-15 11:55 pm (UTC)(link)
well, yeah, I thought it was kind of obvious but the woman who sang the song insisted that wasn't what it was about. That confused me too.

Re: What controversial fandom opinions do you have?

(Anonymous) 2018-12-16 12:31 am (UTC)(link)
Does anyone claim I Touch Myself ISN’T about masturbation? What else could it be about?
greghousesgf: (Hugh Face)

Re: What controversial fandom opinions do you have?

[personal profile] greghousesgf 2018-12-16 12:35 am (UTC)(link)
as I said, the woman who sang it (I can't remember her name now) said it wasn't, which confused the hell out of me.

Re: What controversial fandom opinions do you have?

(Anonymous) 2018-12-16 02:25 am (UTC)(link)
That doesn't make it a controversial opinion, though. Pretty much everyone over the age of maybe 10 who hears the song thinks it's about masturbation. And that the singer is straight up lying, if they've heard the denials.

Re: What controversial fandom opinions do you have?

(Anonymous) 2018-12-16 02:37 am (UTC)(link)
Oh the Dyvinals (Yes, I know I probably fucked up the spelling of the band name) have long admitted I Touch Myself is about masturbation.

Re: What controversial fandom opinions do you have?

(Anonymous) 2018-12-16 02:38 am (UTC)(link)
The Last Jedi is neither the best nor the worst Star Wars movie

Re: What controversial fandom opinions do you have?

(Anonymous) 2018-12-16 03:35 am (UTC)(link)
I agree.