Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2019-02-17 03:36 pm
[ SECRET POST #4427 ]
⌈ Secret Post #4427 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[Beast Legends vs. Buzzfeed Unsolved]
__________________________________________________
03. [repeat]
__________________________________________________
04.

[image is Scarlett Johansson from The Other Boleyn Girl]
__________________________________________________
05.

[Josh Homme, Queens of the Stone Age]
__________________________________________________
06.

(Sex Education)
__________________________________________________
07.

[Tidying up with Marie Kondo]
__________________________________________________
08.

(Gay Korean porn maker Seegasm)
__________________________________________________
09.

[youtube beauty gurus]
__________________________________________________
10.

[Doctor Who, "It Takes You Away"]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 51 secrets from Secret Submission Post #634.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-02-17 08:56 pm (UTC)(link)Also, I think lots of women enjoy the transgressive aspect of it.
I imagine those claiming it's "progressive" are just pushing back against those like OP who see it as some sort of affront to feminism/equality/etc.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-02-17 10:08 pm (UTC)(link)Also, it's not like these guys aren't good at what they do. I don't follow any of them, because the style of makeup they do tends to be way too showy and extra for my tastes. (I feel the same way about Jaclyn Hill's makeup, for the record. It's just too extra for me.) But they are good at it.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-02-18 01:51 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-02-18 02:21 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-02-18 02:52 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-02-18 04:43 am (UTC)(link)well, you can't deny it's one of the reasons.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-02-18 05:59 am (UTC)(link)male media creator: dominate the market and have mass appeal
male media creators: avoid writing women therefore 95% of the cast is men
male media creators: avoid writing women therefore 95% of meaningful character interaction is between men
male media creators: avoid writing women therefore most canon m/f is shallow and meaningless
male media creators: when they write women they’re flat and unrealistic or pidgeonholed and hard to relate to
fandom: is dominated by slash as result
male media creators and het stans: *surprised_pikachu.jpg* why don’t they care about personality-less generic dead wife number 376???? INTERNALIZED MISOGYNY!!!
no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-02-18 06:51 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-02-18 06:46 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-02-18 06:48 am (UTC)(link)nobody navel gazes this hard over why guys like lesbian porn
no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-02-18 07:04 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-02-18 10:02 am (UTC)(link)I've no doubt there is projection for some women, but I hate that it's used as a universal explanation. Like no, I just like seeing the male character I'm most attracted to and like the most find love with another dude and then get fucked. I like seeing a male character be submissive for once. Sometimes it is that simple.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-02-18 10:42 pm (UTC)(link)So yeah this *I like seeing a male character be submissive for once.* rings really fucking true for me.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-02-18 06:19 am (UTC)(link)Uh... I was agreeing with you, and providing an example of why women like slash that doesn't involve feeling threatened by fictional women.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-02-18 06:33 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-02-18 07:09 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-02-18 06:47 am (UTC)(link)God, men are so fucking dumb and don't know how to women.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-02-18 01:18 pm (UTC)(link)No.