case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2019-04-16 06:58 pm

[ SECRET POST #4484 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4484 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Chopped]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Jason Momoa in Aquaman]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Parks and Recreation]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Captain Marvel & Unicorn Store]


__________________________________________________



07.
[The Umbrella Academy]

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 22 secrets from Secret Submission Post #642.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

[personal profile] fscom 2019-04-16 10:59 pm (UTC)(link)
03. https://i.imgur.com/pGxd3m0.png
[Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse]

(Anonymous) 2019-04-16 11:17 pm (UTC)(link)
Hard agree. They not only added nothing, they were dumb and cartoonish and felt out of touch with the rest of the film. If they had at least been rendered in an animation style that matched the others it wouldn't have been that offensive, but they weren't worth a few gags.

(Anonymous) 2019-04-17 11:32 am (UTC)(link)
You mean, the animation style that made extensive use of post-processing to give Miles and Peter a 21st century print comic look, including backstory using print-comic frames, CYMK halftone visualization, Kirby Dots, and even the Spidey Sense indicators?

(Anonymous) 2019-04-17 12:48 pm (UTC)(link)
Right??? The variety of animation styles were a feature, not a bug.

(Anonymous) 2019-04-17 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)
?? Just because it's comic book print style doesn't mean all comic book styles look alike. They looked extremely jarring because the art styles clashed.

(Anonymous) 2019-04-16 11:18 pm (UTC)(link)
Same.

(Anonymous) 2019-04-16 11:30 pm (UTC)(link)
I think they were in for EXACTLY the right amount of time.
nightscale: Starbolt (Star Trek: Uhura)

[personal profile] nightscale 2019-04-16 11:56 pm (UTC)(link)
I didn't love them, but I didn't hate them either. For me they were around just the right amount where I enjoyed some of their jokes, but it didn't feel like the movie was over-saturated with them as it was still very firmly about Miles with Peter B and Gwen playing primary support characters.

(Anonymous) 2019-04-17 12:04 am (UTC)(link)
Without them the movie would have three similar Spider-People swinging around the same and fighting the same, and that doesn't add anything, pardon the pun, amazing or visually diverse to the concept of multiversity they wanted to show.

(Anonymous) 2019-04-17 12:06 am (UTC)(link)
I get that the concept of the multiverse was to combine different Spiderman storylines from different universes of the character. But I have to disagree that anything of value was lost without having those characters, being as they literally didn't do anything besides tell jokes and sort of fight along the actual characters. They didn't even appear until almost the end. Having the three main Spider-people would have still portrayed the idea that there are multiple timelines going on.

(Anonymous) 2019-04-17 12:17 am (UTC)(link)
+1

There's an infinite number of Spider-people in the multiverse; where's the fun in only having the "normal" ones? Especially in such a visually-stylized movie.
morieris: http://iconography.dreamwidth.org/32982.html (Default)

[personal profile] morieris 2019-04-17 12:55 am (UTC)(link)
Right. I mean....If at least Noir and Ham weren't in there, that would have been a horrendously wasted opportunity with the art and animation style they chose.

(Anonymous) 2019-04-17 10:53 pm (UTC)(link)
Plus Spider-Ham is a goddamn treasure.
bio_obscura: (Default)

[personal profile] bio_obscura 2019-04-17 12:22 am (UTC)(link)
Noir Spiderman had his moments for me but the other two were god-awful, especially the pig.
greenvelvetcake: (Default)

[personal profile] greenvelvetcake 2019-04-17 12:31 am (UTC)(link)
Well... of course they didn't add much, they were minor comic relief. If they had been in the movie more they would gotten more development and added more.

Nicholas Cage doing his worst Nicholas Cage impression was hilarious.

(Anonymous) 2019-04-17 12:37 am (UTC)(link)
I liked them

(Anonymous) 2019-04-17 01:13 am (UTC)(link)
I liked noir spider-man. Although I’m sad his costume wasn’t like the comics since that’s my fav spidey suit but yeah that’s just my biases. The other two were godawful and spider-pig worked more as a one off joke than a whole character. Miguel should’ve been in more though even if his cameo was hilarious.

(Anonymous) 2019-04-17 01:21 am (UTC)(link)
I liked them all, actually, and would have appreciated more time on them. One of the main points was the diverse ensemble, after all.

(Anonymous) 2019-04-17 03:20 pm (UTC)(link)
I liked them, it gave a sense of how much of the multiverse the collider was affecting if it was pulling people from dimensions that were so fundamentally different. And I feel it helped with the message that it was okay to be yourself, y'know? They were all different and some of them were pretty weird, but they were all ultimately, 'Spiderman', and that it was okay for Miles to be his own kind of Spiderman - a message meant not only in-universe for Miles himself but also for fans of the comics. Anyhow its not like they were shoved front and center, they were very clearly the comic relief B-team.