Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2020-04-12 03:12 pm
[ SECRET POST #4846 ]
⌈ Secret Post #4846 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 49 secrets from Secret Submission Post #694.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

CW politics
(Anonymous) 2020-04-13 01:33 am (UTC)(link)Re: CW politics
(Anonymous) 2020-04-13 01:37 am (UTC)(link)Re: CW politics
(Anonymous) 2020-04-13 02:28 am (UTC)(link)Re: CW politics
(Anonymous) 2020-04-13 03:13 am (UTC)(link)Re: CW politics
(Anonymous) 2020-04-13 02:38 am (UTC)(link)Re: CW politics
(Anonymous) 2020-04-13 03:02 am (UTC)(link)phew
I've decided to take a step back from interacting with those kinds of people or reading their "wisdom" of how Biden is equally as bad Trump, how he's not viable (because it has nothing to do with people choosing not to vote, and it's not like Biden'll choose anybody good for his team, right? *eyeroll*). I'm probably being charitable when I say this, but I think most of Bernie's supporters are sane, and the loudest ones are an annoying minority.
That said, at the moment, Bernie is still keep his name on ballots despite ending his campaign. I guess that means there's a chance it could go either way, but who knows. Whoever wins and ends up the Democratic nominee, I will vote for. The only way I will write in anybody is if something insane and unforeseen happens (and I hope to a million deities and their mothers that nothing does). I don't like the two-party tug of war, but this year, there's something far, far more important and it's pretty damn urgent.
Re: CW politics
(Anonymous) 2020-04-13 03:40 am (UTC)(link)Re: CW politics
(Anonymous) 2020-04-13 04:01 am (UTC)(link)Second, the disappointment and criticism of Biden from people on the left is real, legitimate, and frankly very well justified, and I do not agree in the slightest with the idea that everybody has to keep shut up about that disappointment or pretend that we aren't disappointed. And that's a lot of what I'm seeing, frankly - anger at people who are disappointed in Biden or don't like Biden, under the cloak of arguing that Biden is better than Trump. For Pete's sake, being better than Trump is the lowest bar imaginable. Mitt Romney is better than Trump. Nominating Biden is a failure by the Democratic Party, period. And it's especially egregious IMO when you turn it directly into attacks on the kind of people that you imagine support Bernie.
Third, preemptively blaming Biden's defeat on the left is dumb. If nothing else, when you're preemptively assigning blame, at least briefly consider the insanity of Democratic Party apparatchiks deciding to nominate a candidate with the same broad policies and coalition as Hillary Clinton without pondering for more than 5 minutes the fact that Hillary Clinton lost.
SA
(Anonymous) 2020-04-13 04:08 am (UTC)(link)Re: CW politics
(Anonymous) 2020-04-13 04:17 am (UTC)(link)Re: CW politics
(Anonymous) 2020-04-13 04:40 am (UTC)(link)Re: CW politics
(Anonymous) - 2020-04-13 09:06 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CW politics
(Anonymous) - 2020-04-13 16:33 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CW politics
(Anonymous) - 2020-04-13 16:40 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2020-04-13 04:17 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2020-04-13 04:38 am (UTC)(link)Re: CW politics
(Anonymous) 2020-04-13 04:25 am (UTC)(link)Re: CW politics
(Anonymous) 2020-04-13 04:46 am (UTC)(link)Re: CW politics
(Anonymous) 2020-04-13 01:58 pm (UTC)(link)Like, if Chump was a fast food meal full of rancid grease and Biden was a bowl of cornflakes or something.
I was just too young to vote in the election that put Bush II in office, but I threatened to hit a political science classmate with a chair for writing “God Bless Texas” on the blackboard the morning after the election. I knew a few Nader voters, and I was almost as frustrated with them as with Republicans, so the Bernie thing is familiar.
I get being sick of waiting for incremental change under establishment politicians who have to have 90% of their voters and 100% of their rich donors yelling about something before they’ll lift a finger.
But I also feel like people who can afford not to vote because their preferred candidate didn’t make it far enough are privileged. If I were handcuffed to a pole, it would be nice for someone to come along with a key and let me out. But I personally would also be fine with someone with a bobby pin or even bolt cutters that would leave me with handcuff bracelets but able to walk away. Bernie voters planning not to vote feels like people who’ve never been handcuffed making the decision to leave everyone else cuffed to poles in a damp cold basement somewhere.
One of the reasons I feel like the Bernie or Bust crowd can’t be that big is that a lot of Bernie voters are way worse off under a Chump presidency than they would be under a Biden one—people who are in the crosshairs of the current administration are more likely to vote for Biden than sit the general election out.
Re: CW politics
(Anonymous) 2020-04-13 03:14 pm (UTC)(link)Ding ding ding
If they're not privileged, then at least subconsciously, they believe themselves to be. Because if they feel they still have room to go "oh, well, I know it's throwing my vote, buuuuuuuuuut..." then they've never been desperate, and don't know what it's like to be up against the wall (or handcuffed to a to a pole, using your words). And quite frankly, they don't give a shit what happens to the rest of the country, now or in the future.
Re: CW politics
(Anonymous) 2020-04-13 04:50 pm (UTC)(link)He won one primary before the entire party establishment coalesced around him overnight. There was a conscious choice to coalesce around Biden, they didn't have to do it, they could have taken other courses of action. That's politics but I think it's reasonable to think that it was a poor decision on their part.
I can also see why someone who promises to bring back the status quo would appeal to a lot of voters. Not me, but people who never really paid attention to politics before (often because they’d be fine no matter who was in office) the Chump and would prefer a candidate who was just kind of there that they could go back to ignoring.
I disagree with that point of view.
I get being sick of waiting for incremental change under establishment politicians who have to have 90% of their voters and 100% of their rich donors yelling about something before they’ll lift a finger. But I also feel like people who can afford not to vote because their preferred candidate didn’t make it far enough are privileged.
It really, really, really comes off like people are reacting to the second part of this as an excuse to not seriously engage with the first part of it. It comes across like "Well, sure, yes, you're right that it's shit that the Democratic Party does this over and over, but we can't talk about that right now because somewhere out there there's a Bernie supporter considering not voting in the general election and that's all we can focus on right now." That is a large part of what bothers me about the whole thing.
I strongly think that the number of genuine dead-end Bernie or Bust people is extremely small, I think they're mostly people who were not Democratic voters to begin with, and I think they're also concentrated in deep blue states like California and New York, where you could vote for Marvin the Martian and it wouldn't make a difference in the outcome of the general election. While at the same time, I think that the criticisms made by people on the left of the party - whether or not they're planning on voting for Biden - are legitimate and deserve to be taken seriously.
Re: CW politics
(Anonymous) - 2020-04-13 18:42 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CW politics
(Anonymous) - 2020-04-13 19:21 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CW politics
(Anonymous) - 2020-04-13 19:41 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CW politics
(Anonymous) - 2020-04-13 21:01 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CW politics
(Anonymous) 2020-04-13 05:27 am (UTC)(link)Re: CW politics
(Anonymous) 2020-04-13 08:29 am (UTC)(link)It's on you now to win it. I'd focus on that instead of how the people who weren't going to ever help you, won't help you now.
Re: CW politics
(Anonymous) 2020-04-13 03:29 pm (UTC)(link)I'm not saying that to stir up anything. He actually still is on the ballots for states that haven't yet had their primaries.
Whatever happens from this point, I hope it's for the best.
Re: CW politics
(Anonymous) - 2020-04-13 15:54 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CW politics
(Anonymous) - 2020-04-13 20:51 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CW politics
(Anonymous) - 2020-04-14 03:18 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CW politics
(Anonymous) 2020-04-13 01:08 pm (UTC)(link)Re: CW politics
(Anonymous) 2020-04-13 03:15 pm (UTC)(link)Re: CW politics
(Anonymous) 2020-04-13 09:18 pm (UTC)(link)The idea that someone like that can even run for president baffles me.
Re: CW politics
(Anonymous) 2020-04-14 03:06 am (UTC)(link)Re: CW politics
(Anonymous) - 2020-04-14 20:15 (UTC) - Expand