case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2021-04-19 06:25 pm

[ SECRET POST #5218 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5218 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 35 secrets from Secret Submission Post #747.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2021-04-20 02:23 pm (UTC)(link)
I feel like the whole generational cohort framing is low-key racist in the way that it centers on things like generational wealth, home ownership, and traditional 9-5 labor as markers of success that people should be able to obtain by a certain age. Been mulling over this ever since pop culture declared Cobain the "voice of a generation" and went through 40 days of commercial sackcloth and ashes when he died.
meadowphoenix: (Default)

[personal profile] meadowphoenix 2021-04-20 05:35 pm (UTC)(link)
yeah, the ways in which people try to group generations by behavior or mindset betray a very limited perspective on who actually belongs. It's pretty clear that technological advancement HAS changed things between people rapidly, but it's not clear that the very poor or the very rich have noticed the same rapidity of changes, since their access to that stuff was different to begin with. And then race....oof.