Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2021-09-19 04:00 pm
[ SECRET POST #5371 ]
⌈ Secret Post #5371 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 33 secrets from Secret Submission Post #769.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Vent
(Anonymous) 2021-09-19 10:52 pm (UTC)(link)I'm thinking the "what is wrong with you" applies to the expectation that one will share their food after the other person outright rejected the offer. But that's just my interpretation. I'm not even sure the other person asked after the fact, or if OP just interpreted "I'm hungry" as "share your food with me."
Re: Vent
(Anonymous) 2021-09-19 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)is it annoying? sure, but it's not a moral failing and you can very easily say no. they're not snatching the food from your mouth. that is my confusion, hope this helps.
Re: Vent
(Anonymous) 2021-09-20 12:32 am (UTC)(link)Re: Vent
(Anonymous) 2021-09-20 12:44 am (UTC)(link)"you can very easily say no. they're not snatching the food from your mouth"
Hmm... well, here's the thing. Not everyone is brought up to believe they are allowed to set boundaries, or that they aren't responsible for someone else's inability to act, so I would not assume that someone "can very easily say no."
OP is venting. They are resentful of something. Perhaps you should let them vent.
Re: Vent
(Anonymous) 2021-09-20 01:48 am (UTC)(link)This is bullshit. Nobody is so isolated that they're unaware that the ability to say no exists, and the fact that other people routinely do so. Everyone knows they can say no, and if it's harder for them because of their upbringing, I get it because I'm in the same boat, but I can still do it.
Re: Vent
(Anonymous) 2021-09-20 03:46 am (UTC)(link)So yes, passing on a meal and then asking for someone else's is entitled and taking advantage of their manners and good nature.
Re: Vent
(Anonymous) 2021-09-20 05:07 am (UTC)(link)Nobody said that saying no is impossible to do. They just said it isn't easy. I trust you know the difference.
Re: Vent
(Anonymous) 2021-09-20 02:47 am (UTC)(link)Now you're talking about why people would "get that angry at someone for asking for a share of your food because they had an opportunity to get some but didn't." Here's why - because it's rude. Even if OP can and does say no... it's still rude. If you have the chance to order food (on OP's dime, even!) and see that your own basic needs are met, and you pass up that opportunity and regret it later... well, that sucks, but it's on you. It's not other peoples' responsibility to fix your error by giving up their food to you. It's rude to ask other people to take responsibility for your error in judgment.
It doesn't have to be a huge error in judgment or a moral failing to be annoying. Small things can be annoying, too.