Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2021-12-15 05:24 pm
[ SECRET POST #5458 ]
⌈ Secret Post #5458 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 14 secrets from Secret Submission Post #781.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-12-15 10:36 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-12-15 11:41 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-12-16 05:21 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-12-16 10:31 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-12-16 02:53 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-12-16 03:30 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-12-17 08:33 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-12-15 10:36 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-12-15 10:39 pm (UTC)(link)Also, Luke's writing in TLJ was great.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-12-15 11:36 pm (UTC)(link)It isn't even as if it was an original character arc. JJ had pulled the same burnout to re-born believer with Han in the previous movie. So it wasn't even original bad writing.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-12-15 11:42 pm (UTC)(link)Link?
It isn't even as if it was an original character arc. JJ had pulled the same burnout to re-born believer with Han in the previous movie. So it wasn't even original bad writing.
It's *Star Wars*. Strictly speaking none of it is really original. And Luke's plot is bound up with the history of the Jedi as an institution in a really interesting way that sets it apart from Han's plot.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-12-15 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-12-15 11:47 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2021-12-15 23:50 (UTC) - Expandnayrt
(Anonymous) - 2021-12-15 23:56 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2021-12-16 00:02 (UTC) - ExpandRe: nayrt
(Anonymous) - 2021-12-16 02:48 (UTC) - ExpandRe: nayrt
(Anonymous) - 2021-12-16 05:27 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2021-12-15 11:46 pm (UTC)(link)Like, anything is possible, and maybe you can point to a different thread where what you’re talking about happened. But the most recent discourse I’ve seen here was several fans who like TLJ, including Philstar, being attacked and accused of having sinister ulterior motives for liking a movie. Probably by one specific anon with a chip on their shoulder.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-12-15 11:54 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-12-16 12:14 am (UTC)(link)But now I know all you have so far is defensive and dismissive “comebacks” and accusations. That speaks to how good faith your arguments actually are. Which is funny, because you’ve accused someone else of acting in bad faith just for asking for sources for your argument. I’m not even saying I don’t believe you that what you’re talking about has happened on F!S, especially if you weren’t talking about the most recent heated discussion of the movie. But being a prick to everyone who has anything but automatic agreement isn’t the way to go about painting yourself as any better than the people who made you feel unwelcome in this community.
But in the end, do you actually believe that everyone who likes this one movie wants to “push older fans out of the fandom”? Or is that just an exaggeration of the moment? Because like I said, several people insulted just for saying they like the movie are old fans. It’s pretty obvious that the group you’re referring to would be a vocal minority just like most jerks in fandom. Not everyone who dislikes TLJ would be a jerk either.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-12-17 08:38 am (UTC)(link)Go, TLJ discourse is so exhuasting. I liked some parts of it a lot and had issues with some parts of it, but it's getting hard to discuss any of it online without someone coming in with their projections and baggage...
no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-12-16 02:50 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-12-15 10:44 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-12-15 11:33 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-12-16 01:32 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-12-16 07:01 pm (UTC)(link)no subject