[ SECRET POST #5778 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5778 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Jack Septiceye]


__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.
[The Addams Family]


__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.
[CSI]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Star Trek: First Contact]


__________________________________________________



09.



__________________________________________________



10.



__________________________________________________



11.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 52 secrets from Secret Submission Post #827.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

This doesn't even sound that out there to me.

+1

[(Anonymous)]

same

I mean, obviously there's a big range that "BDSM stuff" could cover, but if we assume it was limited to roughly human-possible activities due to the real word setting, then it's barely on the scale of deeply weird and fucked up shit i've read/written/cranked off to

although maybe there's something there in the frisson of 'out there' kinky trope stuff happening to what is supposedly a normal-ish guy with like. a day job and tax returns, that makes it hit the hindbrain harder because it feels more out of place and obtrusively? idk

OP

[(Anonymous)]

I'm cracking up - anything could have been written in that fic and yet somehow you can tell that it wasn't 'that out there' from my shitty mspaint-made secret.

Re: OP

[(Anonymous)]

DA - I mean, the words you used were "very explicit BDSM things." If there was vore, or nonconsensual oviposition, or forced feminization and physical gender reassignment, or they put him in diapers and brainwashed him to believe he was a baby, or any number of other genuinely "out there" things, then describing that as "BDSM things" is inaccurate.

So I can see where AYRT is coming from in saying it doesn't sound that out there.

Re: OP

[(Anonymous)]

My dude, I'm sorry that you wanted more description on every exact kink I read that I had apparently been too stupid to believe fell under the bdsm umbrella, but I was trying to make a secret where the font size wasn't so tiny that it would be unreadable for people to read.

Re: OP

[(Anonymous)]

They’re just going by your description though? From what little you included, it doesn’t sound that out there. Sure, anything could be in there, but you only included “explicit BDSM stuff”, which is a common enough fetish that of course people aren’t going to think it’s that weird? The “somehow stumbled into signing a BDSM contract, and now he’s legally owned by someone” is kinda weird, but eh.

Your response was kind of strange.

Re: OP

[(Anonymous)]

tee hee.