case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2023-07-02 02:35 pm

[ SECRET POST #6022 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6022 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.
























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 37 secrets from Secret Submission Post #861.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2023-07-02 09:23 pm (UTC)(link)
Assassins irl are all crazy, same as soldiers. Human brains aren't made for murdering others. So they're either very low IQ or druggies. Or brainwashed fanatics which is same as stupid I guess.
The game looks like your typical pixel indie 2 hours gameplay pseudo deep baggy game. I've bought so many of those on Steam and have dropped 99% of them.

(Anonymous) 2023-07-02 09:24 pm (UTC)(link)
*buggy not baggy

(Anonymous) 2023-07-03 01:31 am (UTC)(link)
It's a podcast.

(Anonymous) 2023-07-03 09:42 am (UTC)(link)
The game looks like your typical pixel indie 2 hours gameplay pseudo deep buggy game. I've bought so many of those on Steam and have dropped 99% of them.

Why would you not look up the work before making this assumption? And being judgmental about it when you don’t know anything about it, and are operating under the incorrect assumption that it’s a game?

The image from the podcast used in the secret does have pixelated graphics, so I can understand assuming it might be a game at first glance, but I don’t get not checking if you’re going to judge it in the thread. And it’s just surface judgments next to the assumptions.

I might just be coming at this from a personal bias though, because I look everything up. Even things that I’m pretty sure about. I think it could be that I’m averse to the thought of being seen as ignorant of the topics I choose to talk with people about, so I look it up as much as I can first. I’m sure I’ve still come off as ignorant in other ways, but I try my best to be prepared at least.

I’m not trying to be rude, I’m just genuinely curious and a tad confused. And I’m having trouble phrasing my comment and the questions in it well. So if I’m coming off as condescending, I’m genuinely sorry.

(Anonymous) 2023-07-03 08:58 pm (UTC)(link)
ayrt
i hope someone got a laugh out of my mistake.

The day I google facts and proofread on fs is the day I'll stop coming here. Too much like work.

You didn't come across as rude or anything like that.

(Anonymous) 2023-07-03 09:57 pm (UTC)(link)
The day I google facts and proofread on fs is the day I'll stop coming here. Too much like work.

You know, I can definitely understand that.