(no subject)

[fscom.livejournal.com]

⌈ Secret Post #949 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

101.


__________________________________________________



102.


__________________________________________________



103.


__________________________________________________



104.


__________________________________________________



105.


__________________________________________________



106.


__________________________________________________



107.


__________________________________________________



108.


__________________________________________________



109.


__________________________________________________



110.


__________________________________________________



111.


__________________________________________________



112.


__________________________________________________



113.


__________________________________________________



114.


__________________________________________________



115.


__________________________________________________



116.


__________________________________________________



117.


__________________________________________________



118.


__________________________________________________



119.


__________________________________________________



120.


__________________________________________________



121.


__________________________________________________



122.


__________________________________________________



123.


__________________________________________________



124.


__________________________________________________



125.


__________________________________________________



126.


__________________________________________________



127.


__________________________________________________



128.


__________________________________________________



129.



Notes:

Sorry it's so short today, but LJ cut me off and is refusing to load at all.

Secrets Left to Post: ?? pages, ??? secrets from Secret Submission Post #136.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

126 127

[xanykaos.livejournal.com]

119. Sorry, um, awesome movie. Just sayin'. Oodles of fun.

126. Honestly, I can't think that's a good enough reason. I love that show, but at six years old? Yeah, no. I mean, your kid, you do what you want and all, but...oy.
I mean, you could always just go with the couple that inspired them: Dr. Quest and Race.

Whatever.


127. Wow. You're a frigid b****. Glad none of my friends hold me to such high standards of movie-viewing.

Re: 126 127

[silenceincities.livejournal.com]

I agree with your comment on 119 so hard <3

Re: 126

[gethenian.livejournal.com]

What the heck is objectionable about that show?

Re: 126

[childings.livejournal.com]

Well, it's extremely violent. I'm not sure if I would let a six year old watch it, but whatever.

Re: 126

[gethenian.livejournal.com]

No more so than Looney Tunes, though, is it? I'm hardly an expert but I never watched that show and thought "Wow, that's really violent."

Then again, we let the 2-year-old hang out while we have Repo on, in the grand tradition of my own parents letting me watch Terminator and War of the Worlds and reading Asimov and Jurrassic Park and murder mysteries for bedtime stories as a wee tyke...

Re: 126

[childings.livejournal.com]

No more so than Looney Tunes, though, is it?

The violence in Venture Brothers is more bloody and realistic (Brock Samson is covered in blood pretty often). That's a little different than someone getting hit with a mallet and turned into an accordion. Slapstick violence is also a little different than getting killed (and not coming back to life as an angel or something), or getting sliced in half or ran over with a car and just being, you know, dead.

I don't have a problem with kids watching cartoons with violence, but I wouldn't let a six year old watch something like Venture Brothers, that's a tad too young (maybe after they realize the concepts of death and mortality -- which I didn't really get a handle on until I was about 9).

Like I said elsewhere, I'm just speaking personally, I don't mean to judge the OP's parenting skills.

Re: 126

[xanykaos.livejournal.com]

No, I'd say it's a good deal more violent than Looney Tunes, or at least, it's a different kind of violence. Toon violence is wacky and most importantly, rarely, if ever, involves someone actually getting (and staying) hurt.

Venture Brothers is more, y'know, Brock Sampson wading into a mess of guys, buck naked and covered in blood, clutching a knife in one hand and a human spine in the other. People die. People die in droves, in horrible, messy (occassionally hilarious) droves. It's a different kind of violence entirely, little bit more hardcore.

And let's not forget the strong sexual themes. And yeah, LT had sexual themes too, but again, not nearly as blatant and strong. Yeah, there's an age when they just straight up don't get it, and there's an age where it's okay (or at least, unavoidable), but I would think six isn't that.


And grand for you and your folks and all. Personally, I wish that my stepmother would've censored my stepbrother's tv-watching habits a bit, because the kid's a major twit, especially when it comes to movies.

Re: 126

[mondaisenshi.livejournal.com]

I agree it's probably not the best thing for kids to watch, but at the same time, to each their own. My nephew's been watching Jurassic Park, too, since he was... what, 5? Old enough to WANT to watch it, whatever age that was. And whatever his mom likes watching on TV, he's seen, too. Gilmore Girls, Charmed, freaking Seventh Heaven. "Unavoidable" isn't a set time, and there's not a clear-cut limit to it. Your kid's gonna start seeing this stuff on TV, why should it be blocked out for something as silly as Venture Bros? Honestly, my main complaint for letting kids watch it isn't the violence or the sexual themes, it's the language. That's it. And that's even really limited on live TV, isn't it?

The point being, as long as your kid knows the difference between TV and real life, and they aren't having nightmares or causing trouble for other kids or in school, and as long as they get exercise and don't just sit in front of the TV all day, then what difference does it make?

Re: 126 127

[(Anonymous)]

You're a frigid b****.

How very Christian of you.

Re: 126 127

[skelody.livejournal.com]

^This.


Xanykaos, please don't take this as an attack; we're supposed to correct one another, but it's harder in real life because of social constraints.

Censoring the word does not make a difference. "Let no unwholesome word pass your lips", yes, but Jesus taught that it wasn't just following the letter of the law that mattered; what was in your heart and mind mattered just as much.

We all fall. You've just been singled out because you chose to announce your faith -- which is a good thing and a brave thing! And I hope you will continue to grow in Christ.

Re: 126 127

[xanykaos.livejournal.com]

Yeah, yeah, I know. I don't like cursing out loud, but the 'net's more my thoughts. Difference between the right word and almost the right word and all that (not to mention the point where you get to debate what really constitutes a swear word, etc. In theory, that one shouldn't count, since it's not blasphemous, or relating to sex or excrement, which seem to be the three common basis, etc etc. But I'm too neurotic to even type the word, so...*shrug*)

I guess technically, the Christian thing would be to not call her out at all. I'm lousy at that.

Re: 126 127

[(Anonymous)]

way to justify your rude, judgmental bullshit! two thumbs up!

Re: 126 127

[xanykaos.livejournal.com]

No, I was just talking about cursing and the nature of it. I'm not justifying anything.

But if a person says that she would stop talking to her friends because they saw a movie, then y'know what? No, I think telling her that is pretty on the money.