[ SECRET POST #6422 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6422 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Given]



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 32 secrets from Secret Submission Post #918.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

The context of the time period and him being an abusive twat is a pretty big part of the reason why she doesn’t do this??

[(Anonymous)]

So, in the context of the time period and him being an abusive twat, does it make sense for her to deliberately rub said twat's nose in her affair by asking her lover to draw her naked, and then leaving the drawing for him to find, along with a taunting note?

[(Anonymous)]

nayrt but I gotta say that taking the abusive rich asshole's side is not the take I was expecting in this thread.

[(Anonymous)]

AYRT

"Cal sucks" and "that was a really stupid thing for Rose to do" are not mutually exclusive positions.

[(Anonymous)]

Nah, fuck Cal. All he cared about was social status and didn't see Rose as a person. Humiliating him one time is nothing compared to the abuse he'd already inflicted, not to mention the years he would have ruined had she stayed with him. He got off light.

And I beg to differ. That wasn't stupid. It was goddamn genius and hilarious.

[(Anonymous)]

AYRT

First, we're in a thread in which people have said that she had to sneak around behind Cal's back because he was an abuser. Part of the point of bringing up the drawing is to say that no, that doesn't make sense, because she didn't sneak around; she was actually quite brazen about it.

Second, you're focusing on the completely wrong thing. This isn't about whether assholes should be humiliated or not. It's whether this specific action, given its potential and actual consequences, was stupid. That "genius and hilarious" stunt involved putting another guy in the middle, and getting that guy arrested. That ain't great!

[(Anonymous)]

it's weird that you think Rose is some mastermind who's responsible for the actions of a thirty-year-old man and that Jack has no agency, but you do you I guess

[(Anonymous)]

Yup! Absolutely fantastic and the least of what he deserved tbh given what he was already putting Rose through. But you can be weird and cape for a fucking abusive twat because I guess the abused woman is the Real Bad Guy here.