Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2025-01-26 03:05 pm
[ SECRET POST #6596 ]
⌈ Secret Post #6596 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 36 secrets from Secret Submission Post #943.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-01-27 12:31 am (UTC)(link)So honest question... say you're in a bookstore, and a cover catches your eye, and the excerpt seals the deal, but you've never heard of the author. Do you stop and google before you buy the book to ensure they're not problematic?
How about libraries? Should they refuse to purchase works by living creators who are problematic?
Like, where does it stop? Who decides what level of purity is required to make a purchase acceptable?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-01-27 12:40 am (UTC)(link)no subject
Like, where does it stop? Who decides what level of purity is required to make a purchase acceptable?
you decide? and then if you exist in a society where your decisions are known and people will treat you differently based on them, you decide with that knowledge too. i don't know if you know this but the people who are going to judge you on your purchases already do so based on whatever criteria they want, and you get to decide whether their judgement is worth engaging with, ignoring, or changing yours. everybody gets a choice.