[ SECRET POST #7022 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #7022 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.




__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 35 secrets from Secret Submission Post #1003.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I really find secret and picture combo hilarious, because art here is Andre Butzer, quite decent contemporary expressionist.

Anyway. I feel you, OP. Sometimes people are nice, but their works are just not good and it's awkward af

[(Anonymous)]

…because art here is Andre Butzer, quite decent contemporary expressionist.
Really? Holy shit. I know art is subjective but it honestly looks like something a fairly talented four year old would bring home from nursery school. The one on the left is almost identical to my brother’s self portrait that got him in the paper at age 4.

+1

[(Anonymous)]

I agree entirely but add as a former art school dropout, the one thing I could never stand was the Establishment never being willing to own up to the fact that all art is subjective. Being able to not recognize genius was always the viewer's crap taste, not the art having the potential of being crap in someone's eyes.

Then again, knowing that the giant solid color canvas type shit is usually money laundering and not art has made me pretty disillusioned for gallery art to begin with.

Re: +1

[(Anonymous)]

The art establishment won't admit that because then they'd also have to admit that when it comes to quite a lot of "artist's" output, the only reason it's called "inspired" instead of "pretentious, yet crap" is that those artists are rich and have connections in the art world. Whereas the output of many artists whose work is genuinely inspired is considered valueless and unworthy of attention because they aren't rich and they don't have connections in the art world. The art establishment is just as elitist and wealth/class based as any other establishment. It just deludes itself into believing that it deserves to be elitist because it's high on its own supply.

Re: +1

[(Anonymous)]

I agree. Very well-said.

[(Anonymous)]

I have given up on it and accepted that when it comes to art I have very plebeian tastes. I don't and never will "get" some art styles.

[(Anonymous)]

NA - Hard same. I would go as far as to say my taste in visual art is fairly shallow. I like visual art that is aesthetically pleasing. If it feels evocative to me in some way, that's a big plus. And that's about it. Occasionally a piece of art I find aesthetically unappealing will speak to me in some way that makes me go, okay, yeah, I'm into it. But most of the time I just like stuff I find pleasing to look at. My taste is basic as hell, and I have decided to accept and embrace it.

[(Anonymous)]

Same.

[(Anonymous)]

I think that to some degree it comes down to intentionality; I don't know Andre, but I imagine he's making his art look like that on purpose, to induce some emotional response. (The desired response could well be "that looks like something my four year old brother did". I mean probably not. But I'm sure there's a non-zero amount of artists who have done that.)

Whereas the average 4-year-old is just trying their best to recreate what they've seen in real life and/or their imagination, but they're four and only just started learning how to do art at all.

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah, this is it for me. It's like the difference between an artist who knows proper anatomy and chooses to exaggerate and stylize on purpose for an effect versus an artist who doesn't know anatomy at all and is drawing with incorrect anatomy because they don't realize they aren't doing it right.