Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2009-12-16 09:21 am
(no subject)
Because I'm getting tons of PMs and stuff about this: stuff featuring actual porn of lolicon/shota/whatever will be linked, or was supposed to be just linked, just like every other secret featuring explicit porn. But sometimes I make mistakes and a secret gets by that should have been just linked. If a secret is posted that should be linked or warned for, notify me in the name the fandom thread and I'll fix it as soon as I can.
Unfortunately, secrets about lolicon/shota will not be banned because some people think it's wrong or gross or whatever. Some people think fic about rape or gore is wrong or gross or whatever. Some people think slash is wrong or gross or whatever. I'm sure everyone agrees that actual child porn is a bad thing. Lolicon/shota is not actual child porn.
Once again, I'm sorry for letting #127 get past my radar yesterday, and will try not to let it happen again.
Unfortunately, secrets about lolicon/shota will not be banned because some people think it's wrong or gross or whatever. Some people think fic about rape or gore is wrong or gross or whatever. Some people think slash is wrong or gross or whatever. I'm sure everyone agrees that actual child porn is a bad thing. Lolicon/shota is not actual child porn.
Once again, I'm sorry for letting #127 get past my radar yesterday, and will try not to let it happen again.

no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Polite. Calm. Reasonably stated, yet a different opinion to yours.
Just because the post has "NSFW" written at the top doesn't prepare me for sudden lolicon.
no subject
Case does the best he can, but he's one person compiling all of these posts. As the anon up there said, I'd challenge you to do a better job getting them all posted every day at vaguely the same time without any huge coding hiccups and with 99.9% of objectionable material successfully filtered out.
no subject
(And for the record, the knowledge the image was there would have made me super-paranoid and cautious about posting it. Apparently, that's just me.)
no subject
no subject
I honestly care far less than you seem to think.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2009-12-16 07:23 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2009-12-16 07:28 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2009-12-16 07:38 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2009-12-16 08:06 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2009-12-16 10:30 pm (UTC)(link)The problem is this is his APOLOGY. You're just beating a dead horse. He was pm'd and ragged at a million times and trust me HE KNOWS ALREADY. I think it's inappropriate and rude to keep harping on the fact that he made a mistake when he's clearly apologizing for it and promising to take more care in the future. Are you right that the secret is triggery/possibly illegal/whatever? Yes, but you're stating all this AFTER THE FACT and you look like a jackass who just can't let go.