ext_278733 ([identity profile] grayout.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2007-05-27 06:00 pm

[ SECRET POST #142 ]


⌈ Secret Post #142 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

22.

23.

24.



Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 120 secrets from Secret Submission Post #021.
Secrets Not Posted: 0 broken links, 0 not!secrets, 0 not!fandom.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Monday, May 28th, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: Here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

[identity profile] lostremnant.livejournal.com 2007-05-28 03:22 am (UTC)(link)
2. *snerk* Gee I wonder who that is in the picture. Heh.

4. The thing is do you love the person or the character that that person is role playing?

10. I still just can't wrap my brain around this whole canon Mary Sue thing. To me a Mary Sue is a character meant to represent the author of a fic and therefore is perfectly beautiful, powerful, heroic, blah, blah, blah because it really is nothing more than wish fufillment on the author's part. So to me at least there CAN'T be any such thing as a canon Mary Sue.

14. Definitely not! The only person Kira is ukeish towards is Gin and that's because Gin is a sadistic bastard who has been playing with Kira's mind. Otherwise Kira can stand up to anybody else in my opinion. And yes he was devastated by Gin leaving but some writers have gone way overboard and made Kira a total wreck.

15. I wish I had the money to buy OOAK dolls but I don't. But I still admire the talent that enables people to make these kinds of dolls. It really is a form of art.

24. I don't care what genders people pair. I do care about the quality of the writing/artwork though.

[identity profile] levikitty.livejournal.com 2007-05-28 03:58 am (UTC)(link)
10. What if a canon character could be the author of canon's wish fulfillment? Wouldn't that make them, by your definition, a sue? And this is a difference in opinion, but I don't consider wish fulfillment a sue requirement, though it often goes with sue writing, nor do I think that the fact it's fanfic has anything to do with it. An original character in an original story can be just as sueish.

[identity profile] lostremnant.livejournal.com 2007-05-28 04:29 am (UTC)(link)
My definition of Mary Sue comes from Star Trek fan fiction of years ago, where the definition was a self insertion of the author in the story as a character who was beautiful and perfect and usually had a love interest with whatever character the author had a crush on.

These days people seem to think that a Mary Sue is any female character who is strong and able to take care of herself instead of being a pathetic woeful damsel in distress who always needs the male hero to rescue her. I don't agree with that definition.

[identity profile] klytaemnestra.livejournal.com 2007-05-28 04:40 am (UTC)(link)

That's my definition,as well.

Yeah, I hate seeing how every other female character is a 'Mary Sue'. I hate self inserts ... but what I hate more is this trend of calling all these female characters Mary Sues because they actually can do stuff, or have problems ... or whatever. I keep seeing, 'Blah blah Elizabeth Swann is a Mary Sue.' Oh really now? If so, what the fuck does that make Jack Sparrow or fucking Will Turner? But no, because they have a penis stupid fanpersons believe they can do no wrong.