Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2011-05-04 07:46 pm
[ SECRET POST #1583 ]
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
19.

__________________________________________________
20.

__________________________________________________
21.

__________________________________________________
22.
__________________________________________________
23.

__________________________________________________
24.

__________________________________________________
25.

__________________________________________________
26.

__________________________________________________
27.

__________________________________________________
28.

__________________________________________________
29. [troll]
__________________________________________________
30.

__________________________________________________
31.

__________________________________________________
32.

__________________________________________________
33.

__________________________________________________
34.

__________________________________________________
35.

__________________________________________________
36.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 83 secrets from Secret Submission Post #226.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 2 3 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 3 - too big ], [ 0 - hit/ship/spiration ], [ 0 - omgiknowthem ], [ 0 - take it to comments ], [ 0 - repeats ]
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments and concerns should go here.

no subject
And she's not lying when she says she doesn't bitch about fandom in her personal journal. Seriously, there is absolutely nothing juicy going on in that journal that any of ~you~ would be interested in. So no hypocrisy here.
tyfyt
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-05-05 06:49 am (UTC)(link)2. The person in question wasn't on the mod's f-list, and wasn't her friend, so that's a strawman.
3. If I ran a community I wouldn't give two shits what people, even members, were saying about me in their own private journals. I would only care about how the comm was running. People don't like me, that's their business. The fuck do I care as long as the comm is fine?
no subject
2. Not a strawman, but related to the topic at hand. What's conveniently left unmentioned in this secret is that this person was a member of several of Lori's communities and respectfully interacted with her on a regular basis. Which is why Lori was surprised to find out that said user had a major bone to pick with the way the (multiple) communities were running. But she never said anything directly to her and instead chose to bitch about her. Lori's always been pretty transparent about wanting to hear directly if people don't like the way a comm is being run. We even made a post in the M_H comm asking people to come to one of us mods directly with their concerns. And some people did.
This user didn't, however, and instead created a post complaining about Lori and the comm, without EVER sharing any of these thoughts with Lori, but still benefiting from the information provided there. So Lori banned her for not being upfront and honest. Which she has every right to do.
no subject
She's the owner. She can do whatever the fuck she wants. Doesn't make it good practice, or good for the community. All it was good for was boosting her own ego by making sure she's only surrounded by yes-men.
no subject
no subject
Prove I'm wrong. I disagree with the way you run a community (mixing personal feelings with comm duties). What now?
no subject
Anyone defending this behavior was likely involved in the original bitchfest.
Besides, you kids have MH > 18. What do you need my comm for?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-05-05 07:30 am (UTC)(link)wtf that's not the name of the community.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-05-05 04:43 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
I never did anything to you. You're throwing me out because you think that I might have been involved in something else, and because I'm also in another community. That's perfect. True colors. Couldn't have been a better example if I'd tried.
no subject
Go play in your own comm. I'm sure you'll have fun there.
no subject
The more you tighten your grip, the more will slip through your fingers. I'll enjoy being able to relax and have fun for a change. May the 4th be with you.*
*Fuck all y'all, it's still the fourth somewhere.
no subject
As for tightening my grip, honey, I've run comms for 7 years now. Nothing's slipped. I'm not your brand of mod. Cool. Go be with your own kind.
no subject
And there have been enough comments tonight about the Disney Fairies community becoming a wasteland because of you that I question the efficacy your tactics. When you run this one into the ground as well I'll be over here, laughing my ass off.
no subject
And in time, we'll see who's laughing. Communities that spawn from mine tend to fail. ;)
no subject
It is perhaps deliciously ironic that you referred to
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-05-05 16:43 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-05-06 03:28 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-05-06 03:48 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-05-06 06:03 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-05-06 06:09 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2011-05-06 03:50 am (UTC)(link)Why did you just make up that stipulation? If that was an issue, why didn't you mention that initially.
How about you not only tell us who all these "plenty of people" are, but send them over here and have them tell us themselves the problems that they had with you, and what you did to "work it out", and how they're pleased with the outcome?
no subject
Idk, just a thought.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-05-06 05:42 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-05-06 06:02 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-05-06 06:14 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-05-07 07:56 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-05-07 08:05 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-05-07 08:25 am (UTC)(link)no subject