[ SECRET POST #1891 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #1891 ⌋


Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________

02.


__________________________________________________

03.


__________________________________________________

04.


__________________________________________________

05.


__________________________________________________

06.


__________________________________________________

07.


__________________________________________________

08.


__________________________________________________

09.


__________________________________________________

10.


__________________________________________________

11.


__________________________________________________

12.


__________________________________________________

13.


__________________________________________________

14.


__________________________________________________

15.


__________________________________________________

16.


__________________________________________________

17.


__________________________________________________

18.


__________________________________________________

19.


__________________________________________________

20.


__________________________________________________

21.


__________________________________________________

22.



Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 81 secrets from Secret Submission Post #270.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 2 3 4 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeats ]
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments and concerns should go here.

Comments

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

Well, I can't believe that there's an ace who's so deliberately obtuse. Demis and grey-aces are on the asexual spectrum, they're oppressed as the same way we are. Hypersexuals are barely discriminated against in this hypersexualised society of ours and besides that any problems they might have are so removed from ours there's no point in having them in ace spaces.

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

But hypersexuals CAN BE asexual.

And are you serious that hypersexuals aren't discriminated against? Hypersexual women? Excuse me?

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

Asexual hypersexuals are asexuals. I'm talking about hyperromantic hypersexuals

Yeah, hypersexuals can sometimes be discriminated against but it's not any sort of oppression that renders them comparable to aces. Discrimination against hypersexual women is rooted in misogyny not in her hypersexuality.

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

that is such typical asexual identity policing!

what if someone told you that asexual women face discrimination due to societal misogyny and sexism and not asexuality? how dare you try to explain hypersexuality to hypersexuals!

ugh this whole thread.

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

Exactly! I have a hypersexual ace friend who physically needs sex all the time, but she isn't attracted to anyone. Believe me, it sucks to be her.

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

We shouldn't just get to kick people out of the club however we want, because that goes against our core values of acceptance.

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

Oh fuck you, we have be accepting and have to accept privileged people pushing in to our safe spaces. If only those uppity asexuals would shut up and let us sexually privileged hypersexuals in to the club.

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

Wow, fuck YOU.

Hypersexuals aren't sexually privileged over asexuals, we're all non-sexuals and therefore discriminated by sexual normative society. But whatever, continue to care more about the purity of your own oppression than accepting other non-sexual identities. I'm sure you're making the sexual majority real happy by letting them pit us against each other.

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

IF YOU'RE HYPERSEXUAL

YOU ARE NOT NONSEXUAL

YOU MAY BE AROMANTIC

BUT YOU ARE NOT ASEXUAL

THIS IS NOT THAT HARD TO UNDERSTAND

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

IKR. They are so fucking desperate to appropriate our identity

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

Non-sexual is not asexual, omg.

People who aren't sexuals (i.e, who do not have normative sex drives and feelings of sexual attraction) are NON-sexuals. It doesn't mean they don't experience sexual attraction like asexuals, just that they're are not included in the privileged group 'sexuals' because they diverge from that norm. Asexuals are non-sexuals. Demisexuals are non-sexuals. Hypersexuals are non-sexuals. It doesn't mean they don't experience sexual attraction, just that they aren't sexuals. Get it?

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

I get that you're an appropriative dick, yes.

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

NA

It's their identity, asshole. Lay off. How does it hurt you for them to identify as they wish? You're making yourself look like those jerks that think asexuals shouldn't be considered queer.

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

DA

I'm asexual, and IA with AYRT. How is having a catch-all term to refer to all people who fall outside of the sexual norm a bad thing? IDG how that's appropriative.

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

That term, if it includes hypersexuals, shouldn't be asexual.

Non-sexually-normative perhaps.

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

But the term isn't asexual, it's non-sexual.

And non-sexually-normative is a mouthful, TBH.

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

NSN then.

We can confuse the normative-sexuals with it :D

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

oh for fuck's sake DO SOME RESEARCH ON ASEXUAL HISTORY BEFORE YOU SPOUT SHIT YOU DON'T KNOW ABOUT

jesus fuck