[ SECRET POST #2002 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2002 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19.


__________________________________________________



20.


__________________________________________________









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 066 secrets from Secret Submission Post #286.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 2 - text comments ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[fscom]

05. http://i.imgur.com/A8Jhx.png

[galerian-ash.livejournal.com]

I don't know who either of those two are, but... WHY?!

But then again I dislike remakes, period -- so I'm clearly bias in my opinion.

[(Anonymous)]

Rory McCann and Maisie Williams from Game of Thrones.

[galerian-ash.livejournal.com]

Thanks -- I kinda guessed that they were, but I wasn't positive.

[(Anonymous)]

Cause people here are all over the creepy smug old men. Bonus points if they're bald or starting to go bald.

I guess that's why they're on a secrets comm.

[(Anonymous)]

Judging you rn

[(Anonymous)]

Pppffffffffffffftttttttttt!

[(Anonymous)]

Probably because of the physical similarities, and I guess OP just likes those actors a lot?

[(Anonymous)]

I'd rather see them on Sandor and Arya's Magical Roadtrip.

[lunabee34]

Ahahahahhahaa. Yes. That would be interesting.

[visp.livejournal.com]

Yes! Although I want Tywin and Arya's Conquer the World more. Still, they were awesome together.

[lunabee34]

I would also watch that. :)

[visp.livejournal.com]

Hm. Well, as actors, I'm sure they could play that many ways. Also, seconding the "no remakes, come up with something new."

That being said, if you're taking their GoT characters, it would be sorta a different dynamic. Arya is far more impulsive and bloodthirsty than Mathilda, and although TV!Sandor is rather more like Leon, it's still a different character. They are both great characters, though, and good actors, so I'm sure they could produce something interesting - though I would prefer it to be something more original than a remake.

[ninety6tears]

I'm not as rigidly against remakes as everyone else in the universe, but that's one movie that really doesn't need to be remade. Still it's not like this is ever gonna happen so I can agree it's pretty cool to imagine.

[(Anonymous)]

To the thread: Everything is a remake of something and no idea you've ever had is original. Remakes are just reinterpretations of something that had been reinterpreted already, whether it be a myth, a book, or older movie, etc. into a movie, it had already been done- even if you didn't know about it. So, sorry guys, hating on remakes isn't logical. You'd have to hate everything you've ever read or seen.

And, yeah, I think a remake of The Professional would be awesome with those two. But, they'd probably get Jason Statham and Willow Smith to do it.. so I say let's forget about it.

[(Anonymous)]

Remakes are works that are primarily based on something else in the same medium.

I.E. the Harry Potter films wouldn't be considered remakes because they're based on a book, but basing a film off Texas Chainsaw Massacre, another film, would be.

[meadowphoenix]

You have to know that there's a difference between being inspired by a general idea and rehashing an actual plot, with basically some mixture of the same exact beginning, rise, climax, or conclusion, and characters with the same names or if not that the same exact personalities and general character growth and the same dialog, in the same medium, right? The latter is what we're talking about. It's highly unlikely that the latter is remake of something else with the same visibility, while touting itself as original. I didn't think you're argument really proved that hating remakes was illogical, since it assumed that the source of the hatred was purely about the similarities, anyway, but your definition of remake, since it does not seem to be the one others are using, also makes your argument fall apart.

SA

[(Anonymous)]

My point is, and I apologize if it got lost in my rather snarky comment, that even rehashes of the same plot, with the same characters, etc. in same medium are still different because they have been (usually) rehashed by a different person or people who bring their own flavor to project. Generally, when people say they won't read or watch remakes, what they are really saying is "I already know the plot. What's the point?" But, while you may heve seen a sunset before and know what one is supposed to look like, you've never seen this version of a sunset because you are looking at it a day older and maybe a day wiser and, hey, the sky is awfully pink and doesn't that cloud look a little like bunny?

I know when people say they don't watch remakes what they are intending to get across is Hollywood is lazy and just trying to cash in on the masses. And, yeah, that's true. But, writing off remakes just because they are remakes is shallow.

Re: SA

[meadowphoenix]

As you said, remakes are not ever exactly like the original. But you're assuming that the differences are visible, obvious, and important enough to overcome the similarities and the fatigue that inspires. For many people, they are not. The nuances simply don't change much. It feels like the same movie, with younger people and better equipment.

Hollywood has a long and detailed history of making remakes that are too close to the first and moreover contribute almost nothing to the nuances of the original or the remake itself. It isn't in the least shallow to write off remakes when the industry in general refuses to do anything inspired with them.

[sai_salamander]

BUT WHO WOULD PLAY STANSFIELD?!

...that would be my only issue. Well okay, no, I don't ever want to see a remake of Leon, but good god if they replaced Gary Oldman THERE WOULD BE HELL TO PAY. I WOULD SIT AND RAGE SILENTLY AT MY COMPUTER AND EVERYTHING. ARRRGH.

[visp.livejournal.com]

*nods*

I would have no time for that Mickey Mouse bullshit.

[sai_salamander]

I literally snorted out loud like a weirdo on the bus reading this comment, so kudos to you! :D