Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-06-29 06:43 pm
[ SECRET POST #2005 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2005 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06. [nf]
__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08. http://i.imgur.com/H1X1Z.gif
[linked because uh not sure if this is porn or not; live action]
__________________________________________________
09. http://i.imgur.com/pNcu1.jpg
[porn of the drawn variety - Tintin]
__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]
11. [SPOILER WARNING for Hourou Musuko]

__________________________________________________
12. [SPOILER WARNING for Prometheus]

__________________________________________________
13. [SPOILER WARNING for Homestuck]

__________________________________________________
14. [SPOILER WARNING for Avengers]

__________________________________________________
15. [SPOILER WARNING for Merlin]

__________________________________________________
16. [SPOILER WARNING for Tangled]

__________________________________________________
[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]
17. [WARNING for ... pretty sure this has something to do with rape]

__________________________________________________
18. [WARNING for rape]

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #286.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-06-29 11:46 pm (UTC)(link)Heaven forbid he be a sarcastic asshole with PTSD in addition to being a hero who helps save the world.
But I guarantee if he were a boy scout, everyone would complain about how boring he is.
no subject
My UK friend tells me he was a bit more abrasive in the comics but movie!Tony is pretty damn neat. And really - is he *really* an asshole, even? He finds out in passing that Coulson's cellist has moved back to Portland and suddenly in a scene we have him offering to fly Coulson to Portland! I mean...that's pretty damn nice. I dunno. I just don't get the 'person who is to be hated' vibe from movie!Tony at all.
no subject
He's super arrogant, but even then that gets tempered by the people around him like Pepper (♥) and even JARVIS, who is basically PROGRAMMED by Tony to argue with Tony.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-06-30 01:31 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-06-30 02:17 am (UTC)(link)no subject
Put it this way -- if Iron Man 3 shows Jarvis as very explicitly sentient, no one would notice a change from his characterization in Iron Man 1 or 2, or the Avengers, they would just be more aware of it.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-06-30 10:24 am (UTC)(link)just because the movieverse doesn't show the complete range and extent of his abilities doesn't mean they aren't there?
Well of course. But it doesn't mean that they are either. Fanon posits that JARVIS can and does sometimes act against explicit orders and own make decisions. I've watched the movies with JARVIS' sentience/sapience in mind, and not once does this happen. Sure it doesn't necessarily mean it couldn't, but it does put atleast as much weight (and I think a bit more, given the tropes of an AI in every other bit of real and fictional media) in the column of 'yeah, not happening'.
To put it in a similar analogy to yours - in Iron Man 3 explicitly reveals that Stane subtly sexually abused Tony as a teenager, there would be no need for a change in his actions in IM1 needed to fit that revelation. We'd just be more aware of the creep-factor. But that doesn't mean that it's canon or true that this happened in movieverse at all. I'd be really interested in that article if you can find it! But from what I've seen I remain as unconvinced of JARVIS's sapience as I am of the fact that Steve Rogers is a technologically helpless blushing ingenue.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-06-30 18:07 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2012-06-30 02:56 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-06-30 10:09 am (UTC)(link)Hah, that's a really strange way to put it. Wouldn't the better question be "what the movies actually show that gives you the impression that JARVIS IS sapient?" Given that JARVIS is supposed to be an advanced AI in a world with superpowers, one would expect some features more than what is present in AI in our own mundane world. But to prove that an inanimate object or system has gained a characteristic of a living thing, shouldn't the burden of proof be on 'why do you think this robot/AI is sapient' rather than 'why you think it isn't?", when the answer to the latter is a simple: "it is not a thing which is generally sapient, it is not stated to be sapient and so far it has not exhibited any behavior which posits that it is sapient as opposed to well-programmed."
As far as I know JARVIS has so far not done anything for himself/itself, has never in fact, contradicted any order given by Tony, in fact, it just sounds very human and is able to replicate a sense of humor. I don't really think that makes it 'human'.
So, what in the movies gives you the impression that JARVIS is sapient? Cause snark ain't it, for me.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-06-30 10:37 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-06-30 12:42 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-06-30 23:37 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2012-06-30 04:57 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-06-30 10:16 (UTC) - ExpandRecs?
(Anonymous) 2012-06-30 05:05 am (UTC)(link)Re: Recs?
There's also The Evaluation Process (http://archiveofourown.org/works/447243) which is about Jarvis dealing with Tony's death.
And this non-kink kinkmeme fill about Jarvis's opinions of all the team-members: http://avengerkink.livejournal.com/1854.html?thread=42046#t42046
Re: Recs?
Probably my favourite. It has Tony/others at first, then Steve/Tony and Steve/Tony/Jarvis (in a way)
no subject
I've mentioned this once before to a friend -- Tony's basically the diametric opposite of Charles Xavier in X-Men First Class. They both qualify as a Jerk With A Heart Of Gold, but Charles is a good-spirited and morally-conscious and idealistic guy who keeps engaging in random acts of face-palming dickery in a totally nice way; while Tony is an extremely abrasive and irritating and assholish guy who keeps doing amazingly great and selfless and sweet things in a totally rude way.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-06-30 12:12 am (UTC)(link)That's my problem. My favorite characters are usually combination of sarcastic assholes with mental issues such as PTSD, because they aren't boring. For some reason I just have strong dislike of Tony Stark.
no subject
no subject
But if you want to learn to like him, I'd recommend you try and read some good fic about him. I can't count the number of characters I fell in love with because a great fic made something just click into place in my brain and make me "get it".
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-06-30 03:23 am (UTC)(link)It's probably something subconscious, the kind of thing that is registered deep in your mind but that you don't actively remember.
I also second the read some good fic recommendation. Sometimes seeing the character's mind through someone's eyes can help you see aspects of the character that you were overlooking and come to like them more.
If you want to, that is! No one should force you to like something or someone you don't.