Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-07-09 06:41 pm
[ SECRET POST #2015 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2015 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
19.

__________________________________________________
20.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 085 secrets from Secret Submission Post #288.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
And the character dynamics DO seem to be the same, so it's not like it's blasphemy to refer to it as a Holmes adaptation. It's just not a word for word adaptation. It's taking the big ideas and setting it in a new place with new stories.
no subject
no subject
Which is a shame, because genderswapped characters could bring a different view to it. (Would Sherlock be treated differently if he was still an arrogant asshole, only a woman?) I don't understand why they only switched one of them, either.
no subject
Yes. Yes. Yes. And I would pay all the monies to see it outside of my head! Especially if they didn't try "redeeming" her or making her more vulnerable/relatable.
no subject
no subject
no subject
The only show with two female leads that is not specifically marketed to women that I can think of is Rizzoli and Isles. And that's not even on network TV. Women are constantly asked to relate to male characters and to imagine themselves in their place, but men aren't ever really asked to do the same with female characters.
I don't think any network would want to take a risk on a show marketed to general audiences that did not have at least one male lead.
no subject
no subject
no subject
In the first part (of the miniseries) and the first book, she shares the main role with a male character, but she is the primary main character, there's never a question about that.
And these books (and miniseries) were the major phenomenon in Sweden for years. And no one talked about Mikael Blomkvist, it was all Lisbeth Salander!
And of course there are major cultural differences between Sweden and the USA (which may be ahy they weren't as big a hit in the US), but these books and Swedish miniseries are available in English, IIRC.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-10 12:45 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-10 06:32 am (UTC)(link)False pretences, iow.
no subject