Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-07-09 06:41 pm
[ SECRET POST #2015 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2015 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
19.

__________________________________________________
20.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 085 secrets from Secret Submission Post #288.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-09 10:59 pm (UTC)(link)2. Excellent image.
Not sure if serious...
Also at OP, yeah. Death, taxes, and Elementary apology.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-09 11:00 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-09 11:07 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-10 01:12 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-10 18:12 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-09 23:20 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-09 11:35 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-10 01:13 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-10 17:51 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-10 06:15 (UTC) - Expandno subject
OT but...
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-09 23:34 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OT but...
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-10 06:18 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
As for a woman playing John Watson, one of my biggest issues is that she had better still be a war veteran. Being a soldier and a doctor was a big part of what made Watson who he was. I don't want to have to immediately go all "Fuck you, you bastards!" in the first minute when they change the character because they think it will be easier and-
(deep breath)
I want to like it. But the guy playing Sherlock looks like a douchebag, and I am upset at that.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-09 23:14 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-09 23:27 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-10 06:22 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-10 02:00 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-10 02:13 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-10 12:10 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-10 00:16 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-10 12:12 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-10 02:16 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-10 07:40 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-10 00:46 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-10 01:58 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-09 11:40 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
Because all I can think is that it's "well, now we can have romantic tension" which...really, you think you're the first example of romantic subtext in the Sherlock/Watson relationship? Or else it's "well, she's more of a mother to him" in which case...ugh.
Honestly, it would be a bigger step forward for feminism if there is absolutely no romantic tension between them whatsoever.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-10 12:15 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-10 00:00 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-10 04:09 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-09 11:49 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-10 00:00 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-10 06:30 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-10 23:47 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-10 10:16 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-10 00:45 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-10 06:32 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-10 12:50 am (UTC)(link)The funniest bits are all the dumbass people going "I HATE MOFFAT. I HATE CUMBERBATCH. I HATE BBC SHERLOCK. I'M GONNA STAN FOR ELEMENTARY JUST TO BE ~*CONTRARY*~"
Cause, yeah, stanning for Elementary is totally gonna stick it to Moffat. Damn, you're so edgy I just cut myself.
Anyway, I'm going to watch it just to see what it's like. Pretty pissed about Watson's background tho.
(no subject)
no subject
I wish this show would just hurry up and air so that people can actually discuss this with conclusive evidence as to the nature of the characters. I am so over the batshit arguments. Both the Sherlock fandom and the Elementary fandom are being ridiculous. (Sherlock fandom for hating and raging on an adaptation that hasn't even aired yet, and the Elementary fandom for defending an adaptation that hasn't even aired yet. The defenders of it might actually end up hating it, who knows?) There are just alarmingly aggressive people on both sides and it is exhausting tbh.
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Negative BBC Sherlock fans: Seriously stop whining about Elementary. It hasn't aired yet and it has barely anything to do at all with your show. If you're angry on Moffat's behalf, well, Moffat was ASKED BY CBS to do an adaptation for America and he turned them down so he's a dick for complaining that there's an American Sherlock Holmes now. This show isn't taking any money away from him, because people always want more Sherlock Holmes, so there's no reason to be angry on his behalf. If you're angry because it's 'taking the gay away,' well you're going to be really angry if Mary Morstan comes along in Series 3. If you are planning on not liking Elementary already, then don't watch it, and stop complaining about it, because it has almost nothing to do with Sherlock and you're clogging up my tumblr feed with your complaining about not-Sherlock.
Positive BBC Sherlock fans: Don't get too excited. It hasn't aired yet. The most you can honestly feel right now is happy that you have something to hold you over til series 3.
Elementary "fans": You have nothing to be a fan of besides a three minute commercial and one good review from. . .idk I saw it somewhere and I'm not going to look it up right now. You can't even say your show is good as an adaptation because it hasn't aired yet.
tl;dr: CALM YO TITS EVERYONE. This show hasn't aired yet, so at least relax some judgement on it until it does?
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-10 06:35 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-10 10:21 am (UTC)(link)If they stick to the original characterisation, she would be mostly a fairly useless Holmes fangirl who is in awe with everything he does and completely clueless about how he came to his conclusions. If they change it so she is really a strong female character, there is a risk of amping her awesomness so much it's getting ridiculous and doesn't have anything to do with the original character anymore. And if that happens, I don't know why they even bothered to try basing it on Sherlock Holmes.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-10 23:32 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-10 04:10 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-10 06:07 pm (UTC)(link)the more likely you are to like lucy liu, the more positive you are about her new show.
the more likely you are to dislike lucy liu, the more negative you are about her new show.
true in most cases. Arguing about how "feminis positive" a show is without having seen it first is kind of silly. There are plenty of procedurals staring BA women of many different ethnicities. I like lucy liu, so I'm interested in seeing if the show is good or not.
no subject
Six seasons and a movie. Also I hope Watson and Sherlock get together and have babies and it out-does Two and a Half Men in terms of ratings.
And I shall be here cackling, CACKLING, CACKLING
no subject
no subject
I feel like they're just going to use the fact that Watson is a girl to pander to all the people who were like ZOMG WATSON N HOLMES SHUD TOTALLY HAVE SEXCZ!!!!!!1