Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-07-09 06:41 pm
[ SECRET POST #2015 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2015 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
19.

__________________________________________________
20.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 085 secrets from Secret Submission Post #288.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
As for a woman playing John Watson, one of my biggest issues is that she had better still be a war veteran. Being a soldier and a doctor was a big part of what made Watson who he was. I don't want to have to immediately go all "Fuck you, you bastards!" in the first minute when they change the character because they think it will be easier and-
(deep breath)
I want to like it. But the guy playing Sherlock looks like a douchebag, and I am upset at that.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-09 11:14 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
I meant more that, well, I thought being a veteran gave John that sharp edge that helped him keep up with Sherlock and his insulting ways. Maybe he wasn't as clever, but there was something in him that had been torn apart and fixed wrong, enough that Sherlock's oddness fit with him. I love their partnership.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
But women do get involved in combat, all the time. This current war is a war without battle lines, and plenty of women have unofficially been participating combatants in skirmishes. Women get injured, and fight to the last one, and die in this war, just like the men do. There's no reason why a woman, especially a medically trained one, would not have seen combat in this war.
no subject
no subject
Also, for me the addict angle is very much a part of his character. Choosing to place the storyline earlier in his development seems to be pretty different from just erasing major character points.
Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
(Anonymous) 2012-07-09 11:27 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
(Anonymous) 2012-07-10 06:22 am (UTC)(link)Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Not that I've heard of (though there have been a few unconventional Watsons, including a few who weren't doctors at all).
Wasn't even frickin' mouse Watson a doctor?
Yep. He was also a veteran, for that matter.
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-10 02:00 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
Re: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-10 02:13 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-10 12:10 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Sorry, but everything 'Watson' has been stripped
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-10 12:16 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-10 12:12 pm (UTC)(link)