case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2012-08-29 06:26 pm

[ SECRET POST #2066 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2066 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 037 secrets from Secret Submission Post #295.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
ext_405598: (Default)

[identity profile] murderershair.livejournal.com 2012-08-29 11:06 pm (UTC)(link)
And now I remember I had to stop reading a comics website because they insisted on overanalyzing every fucking second of the Burton films to explain why they "objectively sucked" but gave Nolan a goddamn free pass.
intrigueing: (james sirius bff)

[personal profile] intrigueing 2012-08-29 11:19 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh man, I think I've maybe read the same thing you have. What was the same of the website?
ext_405598: (Default)

[identity profile] murderershair.livejournal.com 2012-08-29 11:31 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, it was a feature on ComicsAlliance that I read because I used to read Chris's Invincible Super Blog, and he was one of the writers. I found out to my distress that he's best on already terrible comics and shows, and his opinions on Batman can basically never be trusted.
intrigueing: (spider-fail)

[personal profile] intrigueing 2012-08-29 11:38 pm (UTC)(link)
Huh, I never read the Invincible Super Blog. Not regularly at least, I may have read something from there once or twice. I'm pretty sure I read the same ComicsAlliance feature you did, but I can't remember the author.
ext_405598: (Default)

[identity profile] murderershair.livejournal.com 2012-08-30 04:14 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, it was the sequel feature to a complete watch of the last season of Smallville, which was golden, and I think also hosted on ComicsAlliance. But then they did 'Batmanology', and tried to claim that Batman and Robin was better than the Burton films, and just, no. The Burton films had a soul. The Schumacher films were cash grabs, and felt like it.
intrigueing: (bruce - for what)

[personal profile] intrigueing 2012-08-30 04:25 am (UTC)(link)
what

how can

what

Batman and Robin better

how

wat

my brain....
ext_405598: (Default)

[identity profile] murderershair.livejournal.com 2012-08-30 04:39 am (UTC)(link)
I COULD NOT MAKE UP SUCH FUCKWITTERY AND BLATANT TROLLAGE.

BECAUSE IT'S "CAMPY", SEE, AND WHEN SCHUMACHER DOES CAMPY, IT'S "GENUINELY FUNNY", BUT WHEN BURTON DOES CAMPY, IT'S "INCONSISTENT", AND "NOT TRUE TO THE COMICS". BECAUSE YOU KNOW, NOLAN WAS SO FUCKING FAITHFUL TO THE COMICS.

(I always want to say WHICH COMICS)

(Anonymous) 2012-08-29 11:21 pm (UTC)(link)
Was it ComicsAlliance, by any chance?
intrigueing: (cj toby bff)

[personal profile] intrigueing 2012-08-29 11:32 pm (UTC)(link)
Aha! That's the one I was reading too. It's like just because Nolan tried to tie in some big complex social commentary into his movies, he automatically gets to be judged less harshly.

(Anonymous) 2012-08-30 04:34 pm (UTC)(link)
Comics Alliance is bad about that sort of thing. I remember one time they did a whole slew of articles about how female characters are treated in comics (a good topic, in and of itself) but indie publishers and web comics got a free pass on a of stuff they raked the 'Big Two' across the coals for.
I remember one list of recommended web comics included one that was absolutely disgusting about sexualizing violence against women - way worse than anything that ever appeared in DC or Marvel.