case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2012-08-31 07:01 pm

[ SECRET POST #2068 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2068 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.
[Tiger & Bunny]


__________________________________________________



02.
[Queer as Folk USA]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Devil May Cry]


__________________________________________________



04.
[The Key of Awesome! Maroon 5 Payphone Parody: Game of Thrones]


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.
[Lorraine Star]


__________________________________________________



07. http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d194/throwme2thedogs/fablesecret.jpg
[linked for illustrated nudity/porn; Fable]


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________













[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]












11. [SPOILERS for Kamen Rider Fourze]



__________________________________________________


















[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]




















12. [WARNING for sexual assault]



__________________________________________________



13. [titc #2]


__________________________________________________



14. [WARNING for rape, violence]



__________________________________________________



15. [WARNING for eating disorders]



__________________________________________________
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #295.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 (warning for abuse) - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 2 (warning for child abuse) - take it to comments ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

[personal profile] fscom 2012-08-31 11:04 pm (UTC)(link)
NS, NF, etc.

[ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 1 (warning for abuse) - too big ], [ 1 - take it to comments ]

(Anonymous) 2012-08-31 11:23 pm (UTC)(link)
You are TOTALLY RIGHT anon! Because sexualizing children in art is TOTALLY DIFFERENT than, y'know sexualizing children! Plus, it's y'know ARTISTIC! AND CUTE! To, y'know, sexualize children.

Tkae it to comments

(Anonymous) 2012-08-31 11:24 pm (UTC)(link)
wow. go me. forgot the subject line.

Re: Tkae it to comments

[personal profile] habilelapin - 2012-08-31 23:30 (UTC) - Expand
visp: (Default)

[personal profile] visp 2012-08-31 11:38 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, pretty much this. OP, you're close to a kid yourself, so you might not quite get it yet, but you will as you grow up a bit more. Or, yanno, you're a sicko, and so you won't - being female or a teenager doesn't magically make you somehow unable to be a pervert.

OP here

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-02 21:28 (UTC) - Expand

Re: OP here

[personal profile] visp - 2012-09-02 21:45 (UTC) - Expand
habilelapin: A sketch of Fifi Lapin in the rose dress, black and white (Default)

Take It To The Comments

[personal profile] habilelapin 2012-08-31 11:33 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, I find it adorable that grown adults draw sexualized art of children, or characters who look like children. That's just the cutest, most innocent thing. It is not at all a legal way that people with that compulsion use to get off without technically breaking any laws.

Re: Take It To The Comments

(Anonymous) 2012-08-31 11:41 pm (UTC)(link)
Better they have a legal release than hurt real kids.

Isn't loli/shota drawn by doujinshi artists anyway? We know there's a wealth of reasons the consumers go for the stuff, but on the artist end I'd suspect it's all about the money.
lunabee34: (Default)

Expendables secret

[personal profile] lunabee34 2012-08-31 11:33 pm (UTC)(link)
I just saw this movie for the first time like two weeks ago, and I ship it. I also ship Jason Statham and Sly Stallone's characters even harder.

What a freaking fun movie. If it had known that they'd be essentially laughing out of one side of their mouths the whole time, I'd have watched this movie ages ago. I very stoked about the sequel.

Re: Expendables secret

(Anonymous) 2012-09-01 03:09 am (UTC)(link)
HDU! Dolph/JCVD is the only valid pairing!

Re: Expendables secret

[personal profile] lunabee34 - 2012-09-01 20:47 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Expendables secret

(Anonymous) 2012-09-01 06:12 am (UTC)(link)
I've been shipping Sly and Jason since the first movie too. Ever since the plane scene where Jason had to crawl under/around Sly.

I giggled and my family collectively rolled their eyes.

Re: Expendables secret

[personal profile] lunabee34 - 2012-09-01 20:48 (UTC) - Expand

OP

(Anonymous) 2012-09-01 05:13 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm super excited that I'm not alone in shipping them, someone below even linked me to a fic! I definately saw the vibes between Sly and Jason as well, lol.

Re: OP

[personal profile] lunabee34 - 2012-09-01 20:49 (UTC) - Expand

take it to comments

(Anonymous) 2012-08-31 11:37 pm (UTC)(link)
pretty sure I'd rather see someone sexualising children in art than sexualising actual children irl any day of the week

js a lot fewer people get hurt and have issues for the rest of their lives if they look at pretty pictures than if they actually go do illegal things

so yeah, I get where you're coming from I guess
maverickz3r0: trainer riding a flygon in a sandstorm (Default)

Take It To Comments

[personal profile] maverickz3r0 2012-08-31 11:38 pm (UTC)(link)
Is there really any point to this other than stirring shit?

It's not as if you posting this will magically make people agree with you.

Take it to comments

(Anonymous) 2012-08-31 11:38 pm (UTC)(link)
The correct symbol is !=

Everything else you said is also wrong, but nobody mentioned that yet.

Re: Take it to comments

(Anonymous) 2012-09-01 12:28 am (UTC)(link)
ty

what does it say that that bothered me more than the contents of the secret?

TITC

(Anonymous) 2012-08-31 11:40 pm (UTC)(link)
I managed to keep my thoughts detailed and straight in the last wank we had about this, but this time I'm just going to say:

No, and shut up.

Re: TITC

(Anonymous) 2012-08-31 11:42 pm (UTC)(link)
After you.

Re: TITC

(Anonymous) - 2012-08-31 23:58 (UTC) - Expand

Re: TITC

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-01 00:17 (UTC) - Expand

Re: TITC

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-01 00:17 (UTC) - Expand

Re: TITC

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-01 00:22 (UTC) - Expand

Re: TITC

[personal profile] greenvelvetcake - 2012-09-01 00:30 (UTC) - Expand

Re: TITC

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-01 00:42 (UTC) - Expand

Re: TITC

[personal profile] visp - 2012-09-02 21:57 (UTC) - Expand

Re: TITC

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-01 01:55 (UTC) - Expand

Re: TITC

[personal profile] trollometer - 2012-09-01 01:02 (UTC) - Expand

Re: TITC

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-01 02:37 (UTC) - Expand
raven_rising: (Default)

Titc

[personal profile] raven_rising 2012-08-31 11:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Hah. Yea, no. I think I disagree with everything in that secret.
Also-all art should be respected? No, it shouldn't.
A lot of loli and shota isn't drawn because people think it's "cute". Admittedly the non-sexualized side of it might be (I can't speak for those people, clearly), but look at how it started or came about.
Edited 2012-08-31 23:44 (UTC)

TITC

(Anonymous) 2012-08-31 11:49 pm (UTC)(link)
Did we really need to do this again??
maverickz3r0: trainer riding a flygon in a sandstorm (Default)

Re: Titc

[personal profile] maverickz3r0 2012-08-31 11:50 pm (UTC)(link)
Of course. We haven't dug up, revived, and re-killed the dead horse to be beaten enough yet.

Re: Titc

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-01 00:16 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Titc

[personal profile] maverickz3r0 - 2012-09-01 00:20 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Titc

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-01 05:24 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Titc

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-01 00:16 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Titc

[personal profile] maverickz3r0 - 2012-09-01 00:20 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Titc

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-01 00:38 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Titc

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-04 00:39 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Titc

[personal profile] greenvelvetcake - 2012-09-01 00:31 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Titc

[identity profile] mutantjules.livejournal.com - 2012-09-01 02:00 (UTC) - Expand

Not Secret!

[identity profile] bluepunk.livejournal.com 2012-09-01 12:13 am (UTC)(link)
Oh god. This. I'm glad I'm not the only one! Dolph Lundgren is one of the hottest men alive, thinking about the two together (especially since they were rivals in Rocky) makes it oh so hot :D

OP

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-01 16:54 (UTC) - Expand

take it to

(Anonymous) 2012-09-01 12:34 am (UTC)(link)
you won't ever convince anybody of this, anon. people don't change their minds about this sort of thing often. the best you can do is educate young people so that they don't ever start thinking bizarre things like reality mirrors fantasy or vice versa. the mechanisms of identification are complex and difficult to explain.

just anecdotally speaking, though, i lived in the land of pedo heaven (japan) for a few years and i would trust my kids with random strangers there sooner than i would trust a teacher back here in america.

not!secret 1

[identity profile] galerian-ash.livejournal.com 2012-09-01 01:18 am (UTC)(link)
Hey OP, did you miss the panfandom rec meme we had here at FS a while back? Because it turned out there were four of us who do ship it! Plus, looking at the replies above, it seems like there's at least two more :D

Aaanyway, as for fics... I feel so awkward pushing my own stuff, but AFAIK this (http://galerian-ash.livejournal.com/57346.html) is the only Barney/Gunner story out there. And, uh, I might currently be working on a smutty sequel -- which would also double as a follow-up to The Expendables 2. Yep, I might indeed. *coughs*

OP

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-01 16:58 (UTC) - Expand

Re: not!secret 1

[personal profile] lunabee34 - 2012-09-01 20:52 (UTC) - Expand
stainless: Megatron and Starscream standing in wreckage, reads ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US (Default)

TITC

[personal profile] stainless 2012-09-01 02:01 am (UTC)(link)
Neither loli nor shota nor the idea of either appeal to me at all, but I too am puzzled by people's violent opposition to them. Much of fiction is full of all kinds of unacceptable fantasy. When the bad guys die at the end of a traditional hero story and you revel in their triumph, are you saying killing is okay? No, you're immersed in a story, and in the story the killing is portrayed as justified. That's a tame example... and it's tame on purpose, to show that stories and art about unacceptable things are completely common and an unremarkable thing in just about everyone's lives.

Except that every generation has its particular fears and terrors and things deemed unspeakable, the particular evils that completely take hold of us and horrify us all. And in our generation, one of our deepest horrors is to look around us and see the real exploitation of real children. That horror has seeped to the rock-bottom of our culture, such that even fantasy -- that realm where we usually accept that we can think about anything we want -- is tainted.

It's not logical, and as someone said above, I don't think you're going to convince anyone.

But for whatever it's worth, I'm with you. Inappropriate thoughts don't vanish because people stop thinking (or writing, or drawing) them.

And demonizing people for fantasy and refusing to draw distinctions isn't going to make the Jerry Sanduskys of the world vanish.
Edited 2012-09-01 02:03 (UTC)

+1

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-01 11:12 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

[personal profile] stainless - 2012-09-01 14:05 (UTC) - Expand

OP here

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-02 21:13 (UTC) - Expand

Re: OP here

[personal profile] stainless - 2012-09-02 21:57 (UTC) - Expand

TITC2

(Anonymous) 2012-09-01 11:44 am (UTC)(link)
Can anyone tell me what anime this is??

Re: TITC2

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-01 13:38 (UTC) - Expand

titc

(Anonymous) 2012-09-01 12:33 pm (UTC)(link)
While sexualizing children is always wrong, I genuinely think that most people in the sort of subculture we are in right now who are into loli/shota are not pedophiles attracted to real life children because they're just so far down the rabbit hole of abstracting things and divorcing them from reality through fiction and symbols and sparkly cartoons that they're legitimately not making the cartoon children = real children association. So for them, they're not truly children, victims capable of being hurt and traumatized for life, but symbols of naivete/ineperience/sexual awakening/etc.

Just like most people who are sexually attracted to My Little Ponies don't actually want to fuck real horses, they're just that deep into escaping from reality that they steadily regressed until the only thing that they could possibly connect to real life enough to jack off to, but not enough to pose a threat of any kind, was ultra-simplified cartoon horses with vaguely anthropomorphic features (who represent and symbolize LOVE AND TOLERANCE).

I, like everyone else on the internet, have a PhD in Bullshitting Psychology so I know what I am talking about.

Re: titc

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-01 12:50 (UTC) - Expand

Re: titc

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-01 23:28 (UTC) - Expand

Re: titc

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-01 18:43 (UTC) - Expand

Re: titc

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-01 23:29 (UTC) - Expand

Re: titc

[personal profile] stainless - 2012-09-02 21:58 (UTC) - Expand