Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-09-01 03:47 pm
[ SECRET POST #2069 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2069 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

[The City of Dreaming Books]
__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

[Teen Girl Squad]
__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

[Nausicaa of the Valley of the Wind]
__________________________________________________
14.

[Avengers]
__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

[The Monkees]
__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Important: I'm really sorry about this, but I accidentally clicked the wrong thing and deleted the submission post from last week instead of saving it. Managed to save the first page (25) of secrets, but the rest (a bit over 100) are gone.
If you submitted something last week (Aug 26-Sept 1), please resubmit it here and it will still go up this week.
The submissions post for next week is linked below as usual.
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #296.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-02 12:17 am (UTC)(link)So he could be mind controlled but fighting it off and still happy to manipulate the fuck out of the Avengers. If he started to lose the fight against it, it would explain why his ability to manipulate people went to shit as soon as he got to Stark tower. It's hard to understand how someone so skilled at reading people and getting them to react just so would suddenly suck so hardcore at it otherwise. Not without him suffering from boring old cliche generic evil villain overconfidence, anyway.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-02 12:31 am (UTC)(link)Not without him suffering from boring old cliche generic evil villain overconfidence, anyway.
This is probably pretty much it. Joss Whedon didn't seem to be thinking about Loki's characterization as a formidable villain because hey, guys, wouldn't it be funny if he was just basically Wile E. Coyote instead? And so Loki's credibility completely went off the rails halfway through.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-02 12:39 am (UTC)(link)But why get them to all meet up to begin with unless that was also a plan? He could have just vanished instead of agreeing to go into custody in Germany. I don't really think it was about Bruce because Bruce was totally unnecessary to his ultimate plan. He failed at psyching out Natasha but tbh I don't think she succeeded in manipulating him either. Loki's "...what" echoed my own because she drew her conclusion from nothing. And it turned out to be meaningless, too.
You could be right and Joss just wasn't thinking about it but Joss is pretty well known for giving his villains nuance and layers. He's also pretty well known for making his villains smart, or at the very least, really effective. If Loki was just doing the cliche villain thing, it would be going against Joss' usual tendency.
no subject
I would've been bummed if Loki was as lame and stupid as he ultimately was in the Avengers had the plot been different or had he been going head-to-head with a single superhero, but in the Avengers? The Avengers wasn't really a "hero vs villain" story. It was a "hero vs hero being totally ineffective against villain -> all heroes vs villain who is actually no match for them" story. The "archenemy" of the heroes wasn't Loki, it was themselves. The story was them overcoming themselves — overcoming their conflicts with each other and overcoming SHIELD trying to control them and lead them around by their noses — in order to save the world (which wouldn't have needed saving if SHIELD and they themselves hadn't been proving the human race worthy of notice by alien races). Narratively speaking, Loki was more of a catalyst than a villain.
no subject
As far as bringing together the Avengers and then failing miserably against them later...IDK I didn't think Loki was actively trying to bring the Avengers together; I mean, the only person in the whole movie who was trying to make that happen was Fury. Even S.H.I.E.L.D wasn't wholly on board with the Avengers being...a thing. Loki's just good at playing situations to his advantage. Like, I don't think he actually intended to get captured by S.H.I.E.L.D.; he just knew how to use his captivity to his advantage.
I didn't see his loss in Avengers as a huge personal failure--up until the Chitauri invasion the Avengers are doing a pretty good job of kicking their own asses, and when Loki confronts Tony at Stark Tower Tony's retort to Loki's taunting is basically "No, seriously, we've put aside our differences and we really will kick your ass now." From a viewer standpoint we know that's going to happen because it's a summer blockbuster, but from Loki's view there's not much evidence that the Avengers would be able to stop him.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-02 02:33 am (UTC)(link)And I don't think "Loki being crueler than he wanted to because of the Chitauri" makes him more sympathetic or woobified either, it just shows that he was willing to do anything to get a chance to act on his resentment and jealousy and egomania.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-02 03:56 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-02 04:26 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-02 04:31 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-02 04:37 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-02 09:49 am (UTC)(link)