Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-09-24 06:37 pm
[ SECRET POST #2092 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2092 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

[Weird Al]
__________________________________________________
04.

[Once Upon a Time]
__________________________________________________
05.

[Michele Boyd / The Guild]
__________________________________________________
06.

[Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time]
__________________________________________________
07.

[Avengers]
__________________________________________________
08.

[Teen Wolf]
__________________________________________________
09.

[Spartacus: Blood and Sand]
__________________________________________________
10.

[The Incredible Hulk (2008)]
__________________________________________________
11.

[Todd Allison and the Petunia Violet]
__________________________________________________
12.

[Dark Angel]
__________________________________________________
13.

[Downton Abbey]
__________________________________________________
14.

[Winters in Lavelle]
__________________________________________________
15.

[Durarara!!]
__________________________________________________
16.

[Costas Mandylor]
__________________________________________________
17.

[Doctor Who]
__________________________________________________
18.

[My Little Pony: Friendship is magic]
__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 083 secrets from Secret Submission Post #299.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 (also a repeat) 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ], [ 1 2 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-24 11:02 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-24 11:04 pm (UTC)(link)Slut-shaming.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-24 11:12 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-25 01:07 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-25 01:08 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-25 01:39 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-24 11:14 pm (UTC)(link)tbh this sounds like the argument that you can be a sexually active without being a slut because slut means cheater or something.
no.
People still do use skank as a slut-shaming word. So eh. Your definition =/= everyone's definition.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-24 23:24 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-24 23:42 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
da
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-25 02:14 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-25 02:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-24 23:47 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-25 01:44 (UTC) - Expandda
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-25 02:18 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-25 02:31 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-25 02:44 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-25 03:20 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-02 14:00 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-02 14:02 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-25 02:42 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-24 11:06 pm (UTC)(link)please
mention anorexia out of context some more. not like it's an eating disorder or anything. pair it up with 'skank' that's a good idea too!
ugh
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-24 11:19 pm (UTC)(link)However, as someone who has had an eating disorder, I find it fucking rude to compare thin dolls to a mental illness. Sorry if that rustles your jimmies and all, but I feel it trivializes real problems.
You could've said "these dolls promote bad body image" and I'd have been fine. Your point would've stood.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-25 02:53 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-25 06:08 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-24 11:20 pm (UTC)(link)The skank thing, yeah, I'll give you that one.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-24 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-24 23:30 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-25 02:59 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-24 11:16 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-24 23:20 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-24 23:36 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-24 23:49 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-25 00:48 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-25 01:21 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-25 11:49 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-25 12:54 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-25 12:58 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-25 21:19 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-25 21:21 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-25 06:11 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-25 21:27 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-25 01:07 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-25 01:57 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-25 04:39 am (UTC)(link)I agree with you. Those dolls could be cute if they didn´t have hooker makeup, lips full of silicone and anorexic bodies.
Why does everything marketed to little girls has to be about having a boyfriend and shopping?
They are monsters! They could have amazing adventures, but no.
OP
(Anonymous) 2012-09-25 06:32 am (UTC)(link)This pretty much shows that you have only glanced at the franchise and just assumed things based on how the dolls look.
Also, what's your problem with hookers or people who lok like hookers in your eyes? Are they any less human than people who dress according to your tastes?
+1
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-25 14:38 (UTC) - ExpandOP
(Anonymous) 2012-09-25 06:03 am (UTC)(link)And my motivation was the character bios, web series and character diaries of MH, not them being really thin or having huge heads.
MH is about girly characters as people, not about girly characters being stereotypes. That spoke to me.
Btw, I think it's sad you felt the need to call the dolls "anorexic skanks". You realize that some of us are just naturally thin and some of us just so happen to love to dress over the top? That doesn't lower our worth as people.
And that is what I learned from this "anorexic skank" doll line.
That I can overcome my fear of getting judged by my looks, that I can dress really girly when I want to and still be myself, not what other people might think of me.
People like you are the problem why many girls feel horrible about themselves, not dolls like Monster High.
Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2012-09-25 06:54 am (UTC)(link)Re: OP
Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2012-09-25 02:43 pm (UTC)(link)I support you, OP. And I'm sorry for any potential triggering and slut-shaming you had to endure.
Keep on doing what you're doing, with much love from this anon. <3 So many women out will continue to hate their bodies and sexuality because of slut-shaming language like above.
Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2012-09-25 09:29 pm (UTC)(link)Re: OP
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-25 04:01 pm (UTC)(link)