case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2012-09-24 06:37 pm

[ SECRET POST #2092 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2092 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.
[Weird Al]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Once Upon a Time]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Michele Boyd / The Guild]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Avengers]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Teen Wolf]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Spartacus: Blood and Sand]


__________________________________________________



10.
[The Incredible Hulk (2008)]


__________________________________________________



11.
[Todd Allison and the Petunia Violet]


__________________________________________________



12.
[Dark Angel]


__________________________________________________



13.
[Downton Abbey]


__________________________________________________



14.
[Winters in Lavelle]


__________________________________________________



15.
[Durarara!!]


__________________________________________________



16.
[Costas Mandylor]


__________________________________________________



17.
[Doctor Who]


__________________________________________________



18.
[My Little Pony: Friendship is magic]


__________________________________________________














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 083 secrets from Secret Submission Post #299.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 (also a repeat) 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ], [ 1 2 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
velvet_mace: (Default)

[personal profile] velvet_mace 2012-09-24 10:59 pm (UTC)(link)
Bratz and Monster girl dolls made you embrace your feminine side? I'm sorry, I'm all for being feminine and girly, but those dolls are made of skank and anorexia.

(Anonymous) 2012-09-24 11:02 pm (UTC)(link)
Thank goodness. I was starting to think I was the only one that felt this way.

(Anonymous) 2012-09-24 11:04 pm (UTC)(link)
skank

Slut-shaming.
velvet_mace: (Default)

[personal profile] velvet_mace 2012-09-24 11:09 pm (UTC)(link)
You can be very sexually active without being a skank.

(Anonymous) 2012-09-24 11:12 pm (UTC)(link)
Still a loaded term, on par with slut. Stop defending your wrongdoing.

(no subject)

[personal profile] velvet_mace - 2012-09-24 23:16 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-25 01:07 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] world_eater - 2012-09-24 23:16 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-25 01:08 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] world_eater - 2012-09-25 01:13 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] visp - 2012-09-25 01:30 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-25 01:39 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2012-09-24 11:14 pm (UTC)(link)
da

tbh this sounds like the argument that you can be a sexually active without being a slut because slut means cheater or something.

no.

People still do use skank as a slut-shaming word. So eh. Your definition =/= everyone's definition.

(no subject)

[personal profile] velvet_mace - 2012-09-24 23:16 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-24 23:24 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] velvet_mace - 2012-09-24 23:36 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-24 23:42 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-25 02:14 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-25 02:31 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-24 23:47 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-25 01:44 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-25 02:18 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-25 02:31 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-25 02:44 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-25 03:20 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-10-02 14:00 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-10-02 14:02 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-25 02:42 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2012-09-24 11:06 pm (UTC)(link)
mmmmmmmhmmmmmm

please

mention anorexia out of context some more. not like it's an eating disorder or anything. pair it up with 'skank' that's a good idea too!

ugh
velvet_mace: (Default)

[personal profile] velvet_mace 2012-09-24 11:15 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm sorry, your skeletally thin dolls look anorexic, and your "fashion" dolls are grossly tacky. There are other dolls out there. It seems very in context to me.

(Anonymous) 2012-09-24 11:19 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't like the dolls, I'm more of a robot collector honestly.

However, as someone who has had an eating disorder, I find it fucking rude to compare thin dolls to a mental illness. Sorry if that rustles your jimmies and all, but I feel it trivializes real problems.

You could've said "these dolls promote bad body image" and I'd have been fine. Your point would've stood.

(Anonymous) 2012-09-25 02:53 am (UTC)(link)
Stop using anorexic to mean emaciated. Anorexia may be a cause of malnourishment but it isn't the only reason a person may be extremely thin. You're implying that all thin people are sufferers of a complex disorder tied heavily to mental issues.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-25 06:08 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2012-09-24 11:20 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't think eating disorders is out of context with unnaturally thin dolls. There's whole body image ideals and issues that go along with kids and their toys (and adults with dolls and toys).

The skank thing, yeah, I'll give you that one.

(Anonymous) 2012-09-24 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)
Honestly I didn't like the tone and bringing it up with the word skank really feels trivializing. Saying "promotes bad body image" or "body issues" or something would've been great. idk. Not in a good place today and might be seeing things off.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-24 23:30 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-25 02:59 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2012-09-24 11:16 pm (UTC)(link)
I always sort of thought you weren't a dick from reading your comments here. Guess I was wrong!
velvet_mace: (Default)

[personal profile] velvet_mace 2012-09-24 11:18 pm (UTC)(link)
Your dolls are horrible and disturbing to look at.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-24 23:20 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-24 23:36 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-24 23:49 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-25 00:48 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-25 01:21 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-25 11:49 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-25 12:54 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-25 12:58 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-25 21:19 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-25 21:21 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-25 06:11 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] oddityangel - 2012-09-25 15:27 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-25 21:27 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2012-09-25 01:07 am (UTC)(link)
this. :-/ Sorry, they are grossly hypersexualized for a line targeted toward young kids.

(Anonymous) 2012-09-25 01:57 am (UTC)(link)
How are they any more 'skanky' or anorexic than Barbie or Sailor Moon?

(Anonymous) 2012-09-25 04:39 am (UTC)(link)


I agree with you. Those dolls could be cute if they didn´t have hooker makeup, lips full of silicone and anorexic bodies.

Why does everything marketed to little girls has to be about having a boyfriend and shopping?

They are monsters! They could have amazing adventures, but no.

OP

(Anonymous) 2012-09-25 06:32 am (UTC)(link)
MH isn't only about shopping or boyfriends. And yes, they do have awesome adventures. Ghoulia even has a secret super hero identity.

This pretty much shows that you have only glanced at the franchise and just assumed things based on how the dolls look.

Also, what's your problem with hookers or people who lok like hookers in your eyes? Are they any less human than people who dress according to your tastes?

+1

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-25 14:38 (UTC) - Expand

OP

(Anonymous) 2012-09-25 06:03 am (UTC)(link)
First off, I never mentioned Bratz at all. These dolls are Monster High.

And my motivation was the character bios, web series and character diaries of MH, not them being really thin or having huge heads.
MH is about girly characters as people, not about girly characters being stereotypes. That spoke to me.

Btw, I think it's sad you felt the need to call the dolls "anorexic skanks". You realize that some of us are just naturally thin and some of us just so happen to love to dress over the top? That doesn't lower our worth as people.

And that is what I learned from this "anorexic skank" doll line.
That I can overcome my fear of getting judged by my looks, that I can dress really girly when I want to and still be myself, not what other people might think of me.

People like you are the problem why many girls feel horrible about themselves, not dolls like Monster High.

Re: OP

(Anonymous) 2012-09-25 06:54 am (UTC)(link)
OP, this was an awesome response. Your attitude has really lifted my mood tonight. ♥
morieris: http://iconography.dreamwidth.org/32982.html (Default)

Re: OP

[personal profile] morieris 2012-09-25 12:51 pm (UTC)(link)
I tip my hat to you, OP.

Re: OP

(Anonymous) 2012-09-25 02:43 pm (UTC)(link)


I support you, OP. And I'm sorry for any potential triggering and slut-shaming you had to endure.

Keep on doing what you're doing, with much love from this anon. <3 So many women out will continue to hate their bodies and sexuality because of slut-shaming language like above.

Re: OP

(Anonymous) 2012-09-25 09:29 pm (UTC)(link)
This is a really classy response, OP. <3
cakemage: (Ghoulfriends)

Re: OP

[personal profile] cakemage 2012-09-25 10:05 pm (UTC)(link)
I reiterate: rock on.

(Anonymous) 2012-09-25 04:01 pm (UTC)(link)
um, dude. Not cool.