Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2007-08-20 05:25 pm
[ SECRET POST #227 ]
⌈ Secret Post #227 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
1.

2.

3.

4.
5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

22.

23.

24.

25.

Notes:
Things to click as usual? (:
Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 101 secrets from Secret Submission Post #033.
Secrets Not Posted: 0 broken links, [ 1 ] not!secrets, 0 not!fandom.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Tuesday, August 21st, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

17
Umm... no. Just because one character has a pussy and one has a dick, doesn't mean they'd have a better chance at hooking up over two guys or two girls. Gender doesn't matter when it comes love, it's all about how the characters interact with each other.
A male and a female who barely speak to each other in canon have a lot less chance to hook up than two males with plenty of slashy subtext.
And believe it or not it is possible for males and females to be friends without falling in love or fucking each other. Shocking, I know.
Re: 17
Man, don't I wish. While that may be the case in real life, it's sadly not the case in most media. Or maybe I'm just not in the right fandoms. At least in my experience, it's a lot more likely for writers to hook up a random het couple than for the most subtexty same-sex pairing to actually be validated.
Re: 17
Re: 17
(Anonymous) 2007-08-21 08:29 am (UTC)(link)I was talking about whether a pairing has any chance of becoming canon in the source material. It doesn't matter how much subtext two guys have or that they'd make more sense as a couple in fanfic; it's very unlikely that they'll actually hook up in canon. And if a guy and girl are very close friends, you'd have to be very naive to not at least consider it a possibility that the creators might hook them up in the future, even if you'd prefer for them to remain friends.
That's just the way the entertainment industry works. Are you seriously trying to deny that, in general (especially in mainstream series), het pairings have a much bigger chance of happening?
Re: 17
Re: 17
(Anonymous) 2007-08-21 11:58 pm (UTC)(link)Re: 17
I was trying to point out just what I said. The likelihood of a straight or gay pairing in a series really depends on the series, genre and fandom. Sometimes claiming subtext as canon doesn't work. Sometimes it does. Pulling away from canon to a preferred fanon subtext doesn't make canon not exist. However, when you have a series that is pure subtext, you have to look at the genre/audience/creator. Making a blanket statement that the subtext or interaction is going to become straight or gay does a disservice to things like character development, setting, plot, etc.
Is House going to get in bed with Wilson? Probably not. But if/when the ratings are going down the tubes and FOX doesn't care if they jump the shark, who says the writers might not have them get completely plastered and wake up together one morning?
Re: 17