Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-12-11 06:48 pm
[ SECRET POST #2170 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2170 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[Nikita (CW)]
__________________________________________________
03.

[The Pirates! Band of Misfits]
__________________________________________________
04.

[Jonathan Strange & Mr. Norrell]
__________________________________________________
05.

[Star Wars Expanded Universe]
__________________________________________________
06.

[Buffy the Vampire Slayer / Angel the Series]
__________________________________________________
07.

[Avengers/MCU, Steve Rogers and Tony Stark]
__________________________________________________
08.

[Go On]
__________________________________________________
09.

[Star Trek: Deep Space Nine]
__________________________________________________
10.

[Sailor Moon]
__________________________________________________
11.

[Persona 4]
__________________________________________________
12.

[Kili/Tauriel, The Hobbit]
__________________________________________________
13.

[How to Destroy Angels/Mariqueen Maandig]
__________________________________________________
14.

[Glee]
__________________________________________________
15.

[Les Revenants]
__________________________________________________
16.

[The Walking Dead]
__________________________________________________
17.

[The Real Adventures of Jonny Quest]
__________________________________________________
18.

[Gyakuten Saiban/Ace Attorney]
__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 060 secrets from Secret Submission Post #310.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-12 12:07 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-12 12:32 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
Not sorry.no subject
I actually preferred the way the movies handled Aragorn/Arwen -- because putting your epic romance into the appendices of your epic fantasy trilogy lacks severely.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-12 03:44 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-12 03:49 am (UTC)(link)Yes this.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-12 12:28 pm (UTC)(link)Glad I never got to do it.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-12 01:06 am (UTC)(link)It was overly melodramatic, fucked with and didn't at all fit with the pacing of the rest of the films, and practically no one gave a shit about it.
Personally, I just started tuning out every time she came on screen. And god, all those little "Aragorn is suddenly hallucinating Arwen with lots of soft white and possibly children or whatever" scenes drove me up the freaking WALL.
Aragorn/Arwen could have been done well (and preferably subtly). It wasn't. It was way too in-your-face, everywhere, and it didn't FIT anywhere so they just shoved it in and it did. not. work.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-12 01:12 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-12 01:17 am (UTC)(link)I could be wrong, I just know it was something that I heard from several sources a few years ago.
I hated Arwen's enhanced role throughout LotR. Ugh. :\
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-12 04:03 am (UTC)(link)Anyways, Fellowship came out and Liv got tons and tons of hate thrown at her from fans. In response to this, she spoke up and asked if they could tone down the battle!Arwen stuff and use material from the Appendices (and thus we get stuff like the scene of Arwen's future; which is from the book and I thought was very well done).
If anyone's to blame, for the bad subplot, it's the writers, IMO.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-12 02:52 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-12 03:46 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-12 03:17 am (UTC)(link)no subject
I really enjoy Tolkien's books, but they're a total sausage fest. I was glad to see more of Arwen onscreen than the books allowed for and glad that Eowyn and Galadriel both as much screentime as they did.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-12 02:28 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-12 05:00 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-12 04:41 am (UTC)(link)The stupidest thing about Tyler's casting is she was the ONLY actor to be hired without audition and they didn't know what they were doing with Arwen's role (whether they'd keep it to the book role) when they decided to hire her. Oh, and her being like the third person billed in all the promo stuff for ROTK.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-14 07:19 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-12 05:08 am (UTC)(link)Nothing's wrong with Arwen and Aragorn, but it was pretty obvious in the films that how they viewed Arwen kept on changing. She's a warrior princess in the first film, but then becomes gradually more demure and passive in the next two films. I also take issue that, in ROTK, we're told that this epic, incredibly powerful romance she has with Aragorn isn't enough, that the only reason she decides to stay and commit to Aragorn is because they'll have a BABY together.
It was also pretty obvious that by ROTK they were grasping at straws to connect her to main plot (see: the whole "Arwen's fate is suddenly tied to the Ring's! No, we're not going to tell you why, but she'll DIE unless Frodo destroys the Ring (like hundreds of others) ... which is why Elrond must tell Aragorn to man up and become King.")