Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-12-22 03:14 pm
[ SECRET POST #2181 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2181 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 100 secrets from Secret Submission Post #312.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 - too big ], [ 1 2 (again) - repeat ], [ 4 - trolls ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
I've seen a decent amount and I don't feel like it was necessary or enriching at all. Plus, idk. It was made in the 60s and 70s and the kind of TV Making and Story Telling they were doing back then doesn't really translate all that well to an audience used to 21st century style TV Making and Story Telling.
Also, I feel you on not loving TOS. lol. I grew up on Voyager and TNG so those are "my" Star Trek series. And I did love the re-boot movie. But I am so meh on TOS.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-22 10:51 pm (UTC)(link)I can understand finding the look or style of it off-putting (as you said, compared to what TV viewers have come to expect) but there was some fantastic story-telling in Old Who. I think there are a plethora of episodes that - if remade to today's television standards - would stand up too, or outshine most of the new stuff.
But I guess if you can't get past the way it looks, then it's really hard to see beyond that.
no subject
And like, I have never felt a need or desire to rewatch any of the serials that I have seen (lol except for "The Happiness Patrol"- my love of that serial defies explanation).
no subject
However, I totally get why someone wouldn't enjoy slogging through all that -- I didn't bother, for quite a long time, because I just didn't get any enjoyment out of it. And I'm also used to watching old television, so I have built up a tolerance for the slooooowness and emphasis on the characters doing stuff without ever really talking about it or connecting with it openly, which can get tiresome sometimes. Or actually, a lot of the time.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-23 02:19 am (UTC)(link)Ehhh...maybe I am a little bit too *hey you kids get off my lawn* about it. I got a bit too 'don't be put off by what it looks like!' - when obviously you weren't and have given it a fair shake. So, ignore my grumbling.
Oh gods... Happiness Patrol! Yeah, that's one of those episodes that defies description and logic to begin with! But, I rewatch it anyway because I will always have the deepest affection for Sylvester McCoy singing a snippet of 'As Time Goes By'.