Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-12-22 03:14 pm
[ SECRET POST #2181 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2181 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 100 secrets from Secret Submission Post #312.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 - too big ], [ 1 2 (again) - repeat ], [ 4 - trolls ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-22 08:58 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-22 09:17 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-12-22 21:54 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-12-23 08:46 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-12-23 12:18 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-12-24 02:12 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-12-23 20:39 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-12-24 02:03 (UTC) - Expandno subject
And he has the best smile ever.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-12-23 01:56 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-12-23 00:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-12-23 02:53 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-12-23 04:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I've seen a decent amount and I don't feel like it was necessary or enriching at all. Plus, idk. It was made in the 60s and 70s and the kind of TV Making and Story Telling they were doing back then doesn't really translate all that well to an audience used to 21st century style TV Making and Story Telling.
Also, I feel you on not loving TOS. lol. I grew up on Voyager and TNG so those are "my" Star Trek series. And I did love the re-boot movie. But I am so meh on TOS.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-22 10:51 pm (UTC)(link)I can understand finding the look or style of it off-putting (as you said, compared to what TV viewers have come to expect) but there was some fantastic story-telling in Old Who. I think there are a plethora of episodes that - if remade to today's television standards - would stand up too, or outshine most of the new stuff.
But I guess if you can't get past the way it looks, then it's really hard to see beyond that.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-12-23 02:19 (UTC) - Expandno subject
All have good stories and acting, but I think that whether you'll like the older stuff depends partly on your tolerance for cheesy sets, costumes and SFX, and partly on your ability to recognize how the older shows fit into the culture of their times (especially on matters of gender, sexuality, and race).
(And this viewpoint of mine is probably because I grew up watching TOS and Classic Who.)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-22 10:47 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-22 09:10 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-22 09:34 pm (UTC)(link)I'm old enough to have hidden behind the sofa to Tom Baker's doctor, I still get a little scared thinking back to some of those episodes. Elisabeth Sladen was my favourite companion. So if I watch it now it's just nostalgia, I'm not watching thinking about the production values or how different telly was in the 70s. Well except in a good way as it reminds me how much more innocent we were as people then and how young we were as children, we weren't sophisticated and didn't expect much from things, so believed a monster made from bubble wrap.
Nine is my favourite of the modern doctors, but Tom Baker was my doctor.
no subject
(As a side note, I also disliked TOS. The first series I saw was TNG, then Voyager, so when Sci Fi started showing TOS, I just... could not get into it. Way too cheesy, way too... much of a product of its time, I guess. And Kirk was obnoxious. But they've just finished their TOS run and have started on Enterprise, which is like the ultimate in mixed reviews, so we'll see how that goes!)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-22 10:43 pm (UTC)(link)I've seen at least several episodes of each Doctor (not nearly as much of the First, Second or Third as I'd like, but the majority of Four onward) - and I love it all because it's WHO! So as a Whovian, I'm always glad when more people start watching, no matter which Doctor they start with.
Though, I will admit to getting a bit frustrated when people talk about certain topics and scenes in New Who as if they're the 'be all, end all' of that particular thing as it relates to the Doctor. For example - one thing that springs immediately to mind is Donna. I've seen people say that what happened to her was just the worst thing for a companion evar! And I do think it was awful. But then I want to respond with 'But that's not the first time a companion has been slotted back into their life with no memory of the Doctor' - I mean, Jamie!
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-12-22 23:26 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-12-23 02:04 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-12-23 02:36 (UTC) - Expandno subject
On the other hand, if you're gonna be participating in fandom and doing meta and analysis and stuff, I'd be careful about trying to make great sweeping generalizations and definitive statements (about, say, companion relationships, or regeneration, that kind of thing), since you kinda have only been exposed to a section of the canon (and a quite unique section when it comes to the relevant external and characterization factors -- Time War and all), so just be aware of the gap in your knowledge in order to not look stupid.
Also, the Classic Who Doctors and Companions are pretty fucking awesome characters, even if the stories are told very differently. So if your interest ever does perk up, you can cherry-pick a few of the best serials just for curiosity's sake.
(no subject)
no subject
ngl though, I can't watch me most of the old stuff without getting bored stiff unless it gives me genuine laffs.
no subject
As long as you don't act like the ultimate Doctor Who expert or something, I think you're fine. I've seen some Old Who, but not a lot.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-23 01:08 am (UTC)(link)So long as you're not knocking Classic on its own merits, I really don't see a problem. If it's not your thing, it's not your thing, and Nu!Who was specifically designed to largely stand alone, so you don't really need to watch Classic if you don't want to. *shrugs* Watch the things you want to watch, yes?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-23 02:49 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-23 03:20 am (UTC)(link)You know, I'm one of the last people who anyone would call a Moffat fan and I hate most of the stuff under his tenure, but I gotta admit I loved "The Big Bang" to hundreds of itty bitty pieces because for the first time in five years, I got an ending that didn't make me cry, rage, or do both at the same time. I mean, there was a negative body count. How awesome was that, just for a change?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-23 03:53 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-23 04:08 am (UTC)(link)Like, the First Doctor's character arc is a thing of absolute beauty - probably the most wonderful and "feels just right" development that any of the Doctors have had.
(However, if you don't like it, don't force yourself to -- that would just be unpleasant and defeats the point of watching it, and not watching it doesn't make you less of a fan. Just don't hold back on watching it if you ever do feel the urge.)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-23 06:59 am (UTC)(link)no subject
However! I am also a huge fan of the Classic Who I've seen, albeit in a rather more laid-back way. I'd recommend at least giving it a try; it doesn't push the same buttons for me that New Who does, but a lot of the elements that I already liked as a secondary part of some New Who episodes are much more central to my enjoyment of Classic Who, if that makes sense. For example, I tend to be fond of the "base under siege" style episodes in the new series, independent of the characterization and/or feelings heroin going on, because they're more likely to be based around really cool concepts--The Impossible Planet/The Satan Pit, 42, Waters of Mars, The Rebel Flesh/The Almost People, plus stuff like Midnight and The God Complex. And in Classic Who, okay fine, the angst porn is mostly gone, but the concept porn is incredible and usually it's what drives the serial. (As a sillier example, possibly my favorite subset of "angst porn" is "Ten getting smacked around and leered at by the Master," which Classic Who does even more deliciously.)
Anyway, if you're ever curious about how Classic Who does "dark," I second the recommendation for Seven and Ace (particularly their last season--zomg Curse of Fenric), and would also add Genesis of the Daleks and maybe The Keeper of Traken/Logopolis/Castrovalva. The latter is mostly personal preference, but said preference somehow feels related to my love for Ten, and also End of Time is totally Logopolis redux. ;)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-12-26 17:56 (UTC) - Expandno subject
It also might give you a weapon against some Classic fans who get on your case because it's more obscure than the telly show.
(Not that I approve of fans warring but snobs really need putting in their place.)