Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-01-05 02:40 pm
[ SECRET POST #2195 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2195 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 076 secrets from Secret Submission Post #314.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-06 12:49 am (UTC)(link)I suspect that might be because, in some ways, that's where Disney leaves one of it's major tropes behind ['I have to get X to prove Y/to become Y/etc' In this case it was 'I have to get a medal to prove I can be a good guy and deserve that kind of treatment!'] and went a little more pixar-ish in that it focused on the character actually realizing it for themselves without needing an object or physical change to prove it.
...Of course, that's just a personal theory and very likely wrong.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-06 03:16 am (UTC)(link)Maybe it was the over-the-top sugary sweetness of the racing game's setting? It actually made me think of Candyland and Strawberry shortcaked mushed together with a racing game, and I can see how that might put some people off.
no subject
Different tastes, I guess. The tooth-rotting setting and horrible candy-related puns had me bouncing in my seat with joy.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-06 04:33 am (UTC)(link)That's part of why I agree that it was a good call to limit most of the cameo's to the beginning of the movie. It would have felt like it was pandering, and probably alienated the parts of the audience who had no clue who the characters were. With how it was done, even if you didn't know the characters you wouldn't be thrown out of the story, and it was a nice bonus for those who did recognize them.
I didn't mind them. I enjoy puns, and while I'm not totally a fan of an 'all candy' landscape it fit with the characters and story.