fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #2217 ]

⌈ Secret Post #2217 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

__________________________________________________

02.

__________________________________________________

03.

__________________________________________________

04.

__________________________________________________

05.

__________________________________________________

06.

__________________________________________________

07.

__________________________________________________

08.

__________________________________________________

09.

__________________________________________________

10.

__________________________________________________

11.

__________________________________________________

12. [ns]

__________________________________________________

13.

__________________________________________________

14.

__________________________________________________

15.

__________________________________________________

16.

__________________________________________________

Notes:

Early because sick, sorry.

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 097 secrets from Secret Submission Post #317.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

Hannibal Lecter wasn't in it for the money either. Doesn't redeem shit.

Hannibal Lecter's not a bad guy, so your comparison is flawed.

Eating people is okay? Really?

Depends who you're eating. Pretty sure people like Mason Verger have it coming.

There are people who would argue that eating animals is wrong, so...

Those people don't have opinions that matter.

The simple fact of the world is the human is superior to all other known fauna on this planet.

Thus the life of a human is greater then the life of an animal.

And our teeth and digestive system say it's right.

Edited 2013-01-27 23:07 (UTC)

Superior in what way? Destroying the planet and driving other species to extinction?

Well would we get away with that if there were any that could challenge us? Of course not!

(no subject)

ariakas - 2013-01-27 23:44 (UTC) - Expand

insanenoodlyguy - 2013-01-27 23:53 (UTC) - Expand

ariakas - 2013-01-27 23:56 (UTC) - Expand

insanenoodlyguy - 2013-01-27 23:57 (UTC) - Expand

ariakas - 2013-01-28 00:23 (UTC) - Expand

inkmage - 2013-01-28 01:57 (UTC) - Expand

insanenoodlyguy - 2013-01-28 03:29 (UTC) - Expand

inkmage - 2013-01-28 04:28 (UTC) - Expand

insanenoodlyguy - 2013-01-28 05:21 (UTC) - Expand

Oh, you're one of those.

(Anonymous) - 2013-01-28 01:07 (UTC) - Expand

So would it be alright to eat babies since they're inferior to us?

ITT: BABY EATER

(Anonymous) - 2013-01-28 02:37 (UTC) - Expand

... he eats people.

In one book, he helped a sexual abuse survivor get over her trauma and when she killed the person who raped her, he publicly took the blame for it so she would be able to live her life in peace. Hardly the actions of a horrible person.

Fine, Hitler wasn't in it for the money either. Happy now?

He was in it for power.

(Anonymous) - 2013-01-28 03:45 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) - 2013-01-28 04:39 (UTC) - Expand

Oh, he's a pretty cool guy, then. Totally makes up for the whole cannibalistic serial killer aspect.

I know this one dude who helps the elderly out with their taxes. He's a sweet guy, if you don't account for the puppies he regularly drowns.

Are any of those puppies rapists?

greenvelvetcake - 2013-01-28 02:08 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) - 2013-01-28 02:33 (UTC) - Expand

Most people deserve to die. Can't say the same about dogs.

greenvelvetcake - 2013-01-28 03:10 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) - 2013-01-28 03:32 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) - 2013-01-28 03:50 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) - 2013-01-28 04:04 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) - 2013-01-28 04:18 (UTC) - Expand

insanenoodlyguy - 2013-01-28 05:24 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) - 2013-01-28 05:27 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) - 2013-01-28 06:05 (UTC) - Expand

thezmage - 2013-01-28 08:21 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) - 2013-01-28 15:39 (UTC) - Expand

thezmage - 2013-01-28 16:08 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) - 2013-01-28 18:21 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) - 2013-01-28 20:13 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) - 2013-01-28 03:52 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) - 2013-01-28 04:21 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) - 2013-01-28 04:54 (UTC) - Expand

insanenoodlyguy - 2013-01-28 05:26 (UTC) - Expand

He has his own moral code. Like when Mason Verger's sister killed him because had molested her, and Hannibal took the blame so she wouldn't get in trouble.

1. that book was crap.
2. He made a deal with her that she killed Mason and he got away - it wasn't exactly a spontaneous action of goodwill.
3. Even if he made her flowers and a card with "sorry you were molested, hope you feel better," on it, it wouldn't negate his being an insane murderous cannibal.

He made a deal with her that she killed Mason and he got away - it wasn't exactly a spontaneous action of goodwill.

Not true. When he was a psychiatrist, he helped her for no ulterior motive except that he empathized with her. The reason why he made Verger cut off his face in the first place was was because he was offended by what he had done to her.

Margot really didn't do much in the way of rescuing Hannibal-- that was Clarice. Hannibal had no reason to help her after.

that book was crap.

No it wasn't. Hannibal Rising was though. :(

This. -_-

I couldn't even get past the first few chapters....and I think even the writer felt the same. Because didn't Harris NOT want to write more after Hannibal? But he was kind of bullied into it by his publisher? I seem to remember there being something like that....but I'm sure.

Dino De Laurentiis (the producer of the films) basically said to Harris "I want a Hannibal prequel, and if you don't do it, I'll get someone else to do it for you." So Harris was like, "Fine, I'll do it."

otakugal15 - 2013-01-27 22:18 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) - 2013-01-27 22:26 (UTC) - Expand

otakugal15 - 2013-01-27 22:48 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) - 2013-01-27 23:11 (UTC) - Expand

otakugal15 - 2013-01-27 23:14 (UTC) - Expand

1. Says you.

2 and 3 have been explained, of which I agree with the others.

1. the book was fucking awesome, one of the best reads I've done in a long time at the time I read it

2. There were some shreds of decency in Lecter twisted up with the evil in him, which makes him compelling.