[ SECRET POST #2223 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2223 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19.


__________________________________________________



20.


__________________________________________________



21.


__________________________________________________



22.


__________________________________________________














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 06 pages, 127 secrets from Secret Submission Post #318.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[cielo]

unlike what people may tell you, it isn't that big of a crime to refuse to watch something because of the art. i was once told here that i was shallow for not wanting to get into fandom with art i hated, lol but yeah, if it doesn't work for you, there isn't much to do about it unless your tastes change D:

[(Anonymous)]

This.

I got that crap from MLP stans.

"Did you even watch it?" is their battle call.

Nope. I don't like the art. End of story.

[truxillogical]

I will say when I first saw the art, I hated it. It looked so wrong compared to the stuff I grew up with.

But seeing it in action and all, getting into the show--I really do like the designs now. And I LOVE that the mane six follow the silhouette rule and you could tell them apart just from their shadows.

But YMMV. Cool.

[(Anonymous)]

ayrt

I understand it's a good show, especially for kids, good messages and all that, so I'm totally behind that.

I just couldn't get into it when I did try watching some clips of it.

[truxillogical]

Fair deal. I'm sorta that way with Adventure Time. Glad a show like that exists, but not really my bag.

[(Anonymous)]

I was meh on clips, too. All I can really say is, give the pilot a chance. It probably can win you- I know it won me. But then I'm an Aspie and Twilight Sparkle as a character spoke to me, so. *shrug*

[(Anonymous)]

The funny thing is, I was the exact opposite with the traditional my little ponies. My best friend growing up loved them to death, and I just thought they looked like overly eyelashed hippos than anything else. Other than the colors, there was nothing telling them apart physically (lol what personalities?). I despised them and wanted nothing to do with them, but then when I was shown the gen 4 ponies, I fell in love. :)

[truxillogical]

I have a hard time looking at Gen 1 ponies now, TBH. And I mean, I collected the HELL out of those things.

[(Anonymous)]

IA with your first line. I was an MLP dork, and the way they're drawn now makes me instinctively recoil.

But I felt that way about later iterations of the toys, too, so it's mainly a 'get off my lawn' issue.

[(Anonymous)]

This is how I feel about Adventure Time...and Regular Show...and that Gumball thing. Seriously Cartoon Network stop getting show ideas from people who do LSD and then hire ten year olds to draw the characters.

[(Anonymous)]

This is how I've felt about Cartoon Network and Nickelodeon since I was a kid. There were so many things that I didn't touch from a combination of not liking the writing and not being able to stand the deformed scribbles.

Everything from Rugrats to Ed, Edd, n Eddy seemed so ugly! And I wanted to like cartoons, dammit. I was eight and normal kids liked cartoons. But I was so jealous of old cartoons (the animated Batman, Thundercats, even the little I saw of the Ninja Turtles) and cartoons from other countries (Russia, Australia, and Mexico FTW) that didn't seem so cheap and crappy. Captain Planet wasn't always beautifully animated, but at least their people looked like people and the main source of humor wasn't toilet jokes. I'd go to garage sales and see lunchboxes with the old My Little Pony, or Biker Mice from Mars, or whatever, and think "why can't I find anything drawn like that?" And I'd feel bad because I wanted to like the things that were shiny and on tv now, and mostly I just didn't.

Now that I'm an adult, it's not that hard to find artists who are obsessed with the "brilliant animation style" of the cartoons that were on when they/I were little. But it boggles my mind that anyone would aspire to draw in the style of Ren and Stimpy. I mean, I get that there's a progression from, say, The Simpsons to South Park to Family Guy and beyond. It's just so alien to anything I found watchable that a(n irrational) part of me is amazed that it resonated with anybody.

I worry this post is coming across as judgmental, when I only mean it as thoroughly subjective - what all of that looked like through my eyes. I'm not saying there weren't good things about those shows. They just always rubbed me the wrong way. For ... way too many reasons, but the art was an important factor.

[(Anonymous)]

*headtilt* Old cartoons like BTAS, and you're an adult? Rugrats actually predates BTAS. I'll give you TMNT, as it was definitely 80s, but...

I don't like the Ren & Stimpy's art style, but it's what's popular, so... whatever. I just won't watch the show.

[(Anonymous)]

AYRT

I am. Time flies, right? Anyway, I don't know Batman well enough to say for sure. My mind classified it with the older toys. There were animated versions of the cartoon in the 60s and 70s, before the one that they called BTAS in the 90s, so I'm guessing that's where I got it.

[truxillogical]

Okay, flat-out, I hate Ren and Stimpy.

But from an animation standpoint, they were doing some seriously bold stuff. Not just, y'know, because they had way-too-raunchy toilet humor. They didn't have set character models like most shows, they weren't trying to have that on-model look that defines a lot of animation. Everything would be drawn new and over-the-top each time. They would throw in those random gross-out-close-ups, and they'd be, y'know, these really well-rendered paintings, for pity's sake.

I really do miss seeing at least a few good action cartoons where people were drawn like people, say, like Gargoyles or even DCAU (though that was more stylized). But I have to applaud shows like Chowder or Flapjack where they went out of their way to use any sort of medium they could find, just to see if they could--puppets, painting, food...whatever. It's fascinating to see what they do.

[(Anonymous)]

"Seriously Cartoon Network stop getting show ideas from people who do LSD"

Exactly this.
I tried to watch all of these shows because people kept on telling me they were good, but instead they just disturbed me with their randomness.

[(Anonymous)]

I'm just guessing that you never watched any vintage animated shorts as a kid. Because trippy cartoons aren't a new thing. In fact, they are the backbone of the genre.

Not saying you're not allowed to hate it.

[(Anonymous)]

...animation is not a genre.