Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-02-22 07:11 pm
[ SECRET POST #2243 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2243 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[Evolution]
__________________________________________________
03.

[My Chemical Romance and One Direction]
__________________________________________________
04.

[silence of the lambs]
__________________________________________________
05. http://oi46.tinypic.com/vzc4lk.jpg
[linked for casual nudity; not porn but not the artsy kind either]
__________________________________________________
06. http://i48.tinypic.com/2ivll3b.png
[somewhat sexual photomanip]
__________________________________________________
07. http://i.imgur.com/88IwqTG.jpg
[and this one has naked kim jong il in it]
__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

[paranatural]
__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]
14. [SPOILERS for Walking Dead]

__________________________________________________
15. [SPOILERS for Super Dangan Ronpa 2]

__________________________________________________
16. [SPOILERS for Pokemon BW 2]

__________________________________________________
17. [SPOILERS for Walking Dead]

__________________________________________________
18. [SPOILERS for Homestuck]

__________________________________________________
[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]
19. [WARNING for rape]

__________________________________________________
20. [WARNING for dub-con]

[The Rocketeer]
__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #320.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - template ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
With two male leads, though, platonic romance is all over the place and shows and movies where the two male leads get together in the end or have explicit sexual tension is basically impossible to find. So people who whine about shipping male leads are just completely ridiculous. It's not like there's a dearth of platonic male friendships that never become romantic in media.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-23 01:08 am (UTC)(link)no subject
Guess that's what happens when you reuse too many words in one comment...
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-23 04:16 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-24 00:50 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-23 05:41 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-23 12:35 am (UTC)(link)no subject
I ship Holmes and Watson in the original canon but not in the show. In fact, I find BBC's Sherlock to feature the least shippable incarnations of the duo (of course, I can't speak for Elementary). Their friendship is so strong that a romance would almost compromise it, take away some of the individuality that makes each character so appealing. Plus John is so definitively heterosexual that I can't understand how the pairing is justified.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-23 04:49 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-23 12:47 am (UTC)(link)no subject
I ship them [tis fun!] but I don't ACTUALLY consider it canon. I am not crazy and do realize that it is possible to just be friends with someone!
no subject
2. Not just Holmes/Watson, I can't ship anything where a friend becoming a romantic partner would leave one character without any friends. It's too lonely.
3. It's not about the superiority of "broship" - friends and lovers occupy different places in life and I think both are important to happiness.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-23 04:08 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-23 04:36 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-23 05:41 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-23 07:16 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-23 13:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-23 17:23 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-23 05:13 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-23 05:53 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-23 09:23 am (UTC)(link)I mean, your prefence and all. Your reasoning seems off though.
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-23 01:03 am (UTC)(link)(And I'm with you on brotp/broship - really? Since when do you need a super special word for BFFs?)
A question for OP
Re: A question for OP
Re: A question for OP
Re: A question for OP
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-23 06:51 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-23 08:28 am (UTC)(link)If I take a chocolate cake recipe and switch out raspberries for strawberries ain't nobody going to eat that fuckin cake but me so step off about me 'ruining' it.
no subject
AYART
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-23 16:44 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-25 05:09 am (UTC)(link)Your second point: I use that as a term for awesome duos in which *I personally* don't see romance chemistry, because 'I ship them' generally implies that you want a couple and 'I friendship them' doesn't sound like it contains a verb. (I use this term for m/m, m/f, f/f, and even family pairs.)