case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-03-02 03:53 pm

[ SECRET POST #2251 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2251 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 112 secrets from Secret Submission Post #322.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2013-03-02 11:05 pm (UTC)(link)
i feel like op might be reacting to how people place multi-shipping above otp-shipping, which might rub otp-shippers the wrong way.

also, i sort of agree that shipping character A/everyone does not a multishipper make. I only consider people multi-shippers if they are able to at least ship a/b, a/c, and b/c simultaneously.
brooms: (pingu)

[personal profile] brooms 2013-03-02 11:11 pm (UTC)(link)
i feel like op might be reacting to how people place multi-shipping above otp-shipping, which might rub otp-shippers the wrong way.

that was how i read it as well. it belongs in the same disingenuous branch as "ot3(4,5...) is the superior option!!1", imo.

(Anonymous) 2013-03-03 12:50 am (UTC)(link)
I ship C/D, G/H, X/Y, B/V and Å/Ä in one of my fandoms, but I also ship A/B, A/C, A/D, A/E, A/F, A/H and A/I in that same fandom. Do I count as a multi-shipper, or am I just doing shipping wrong for mostly shipping A? Curious minds need to know.
iggy: (Default)

[personal profile] iggy 2013-03-03 01:07 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah there are a lot of fans that do that, and it's freaking irritating. There are also a fair amount of fans that think multi-shipping solves all problems and if you don't do it you're perpetuating wank... or something.

As for the second part, I don't really care why someone labels themselves a multishipper. If they say they're one, whatever that's fine with me. But that's why I don't consider myself a multishipper? For example I ship America from Hetalia with a few people, but not simultaneously. I like a few pairings as having occurred in the past, but just USxUK for WWII and beyond (thus it's my OTP).