ext_33427 (
degrees.livejournal.com) wrote in
fandomsecrets2007-09-06 03:21 pm
[ SECRET POST #244 ]
⌈ Secret Post #244 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
1.

2.

3.
4.
5.

6.

7.
8.
9.

10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.

16.
17.
18.
19.

20.

21.

22.

23.
24.

25.

26.

27.

28.

29.

30.

31.

32.

33.

34.

35.

36.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 036 secrets from Secret Submission Post #035.
Secrets Not Posted: 0 broken links, 0 not!secrets, [ 1 ] not!fandom.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Friday, September 7th, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

36
(Anonymous) 2007-09-06 11:48 pm (UTC)(link)I think your problem is that you admit you haven't seen many english-language fanartists. Just like everyone else who makes such rude generalizations. Sure, there are some that post in comms, but a lot of those artists are terrible. They're whoring their art around because they can't get hits otherwise.
There are AMAZING artists out there. And I don't know why people would rather see crap like this (http://i10.tinypic.com/4yupvuu.jpg) than stuff like this (http://fevereon.deviantart.com/art/Sephiroth-complete-15095133) (not that all american fanartists do hyperrealism... she was just the first to come to mind). Really, motion? Fuck that. I'd take awesome anatomy and shading and knowledge of the human figure over "motion" any day.
Do you really think japanese people have some sort of super art gene? Wtf. It's just ignorance on the part of you japanese artist worshippers that perpetuates this
Re: 36
What's wrong with the "crap" art :/ I mean, sure, it's not amazing, but I honestly don't see anything terrible wrong with it...
Re: 36
(Anonymous) 2007-09-07 12:08 am (UTC)(link)It's not awful. It's just sort of bad. And not very impressive. And there's a lot of japanese art that looks like that. Sketchy, hardly finished looking stuff that doesn't show a great understanding of anatomy, lighting, or just artistic techniques in general. Sure, there's lots of english-language stuff that's the same. But that's the point. There isn't a magical art gene that the japanese have.
Re: 36
Re: 36
Incidently, I was specifically comparing japanese scribbles to english ones. Which are specifically all that you mentioned in your secret. Neither of what you linked are oekaki-ish at all. And, if it makes you feel any less righteously enraged, I'm pretty sure I have the second picture on my harddrive (it looks very familiar) meanwhile I've never seen the first and it's very boring.
Do I think a scribble with 'motion' is better than a full out wallpaper with good proportion, excellent coloring and mood and an IC character? Fuck no. But do I think a scribble with motion is better than a sketch of a character just standing there? Yes.
As I already said, and heavily implied! I don't care if the artist is american or japanese. I do think, however, as a culture, you can find more appealing low level art among the japanese. I actually do tend to prefer american artists for the high end stuff, because I do like realism, I like full out awesome fucking backgrounds, I like the fact that Americans tend to be more brutal, grittier and more IC dammit. But jfen produces those scribbles you're so jealous of en-masse. Are they ALL unconditionally awesome? No. Do I have plenty of them saved on my harddrive that are? Yes. Do I think the japanese as a culture manage this because OMG JAPAN IS SUPERIOR? No. I think they've just anime and manga as a part of their popular culture longer than we have. In recent years good american art has gone through the roof as we all grow up, as we get better, as we stick with it. We're catching up, that's all. But as a whole, in terms of numbers and averge quality, as we still behind? I think so.
Now that you've told me what my problem is, here, specifically, is yours:
Do you really think japanese people have some sort of super art gene? Wtf. It's just ignorance on the part of you japanese artist worshippers that perpetuates this
I did not say or imply any of this, anywhere, at all! I said that I cared about and enjoyed a lot of scribbly jfen art and you've blown it into amazing proportions! Seriously, mellow down. The fact that I like oekaki doesn't make me an eater of babies or a hater of american art or even a wapanese. It means that Jart takes up the vast majority of what is passed around the internet and I can admit that and enjoy it without taking it personally, or thinking that somehow defaces or degrades american artists. Try it.
Re: 36
(Anonymous) 2007-09-07 12:30 am (UTC)(link)I worded it wrong. I wasn't comparing japanese scribbles to american scribbles - I was comparing overall art. I was referring to the fact that people say that japan produces better and more artists than english speaking countries.
I personally don't explore much beyond whatever 4chan threads I'm linked to
I do think, however, as a culture, you can find more appealing low level art among the japanese.
Like I said. You don't know what you're talking about, and you are making bizarre generalizations as a result. Bizarre and insulting. Maybe you just don't see it, but you admitted yourself that you don't have a great view of japanese fanart and english fanart. So I don't know why you would present your views as fact.
We're catching up, that's all. But as a whole, in terms of numbers and averge quality, as we still behind? I think so.
The amazing ignorance of your statement baffles me. Do you honestly think that eng-fen haven't been doing fanart as long as jfen have? I'm not just talking about animanga/videogames here. I'm talking overall. I'm a little confused really with what you keep saying, because I just don't understand what you mean. Fanart isn't limited to anime style, either. So no, we aren't catching up, and forgive me for feeling very insulted that you seem to think we have something to catch up for.
Because we don't. English speaking artists have a LOT going for them. We're not blindly parroting japanese fanartists. We are not somehow deficient to the japanese in terms of art history. We are not lacking in numbers in any way, shape, or form.
What we are is somewhat underappreciated on some parts of the internet. And you're continuing to underappreciate us by somehow believing that we are trying to make up for something. That there is a gap we are trying to close.
Trust me. There's no gap. You might think you see one, you might think that you see things precisely and clearly, but you don't. And when you actually get to know english language fanartists, when you chill in artist alleys at cons, when you hang out on english speaking art forums, maybe then you will understand what I'm saying. But right now your views of the internet are skewed by 4chan and LJ or something. Because you just don't seem to see things as they are.
Re: 36
What you're pissed about me doing I didn't do. You read into it, probably because you're pissy. Because my opinion angers you for being different than your opinion which you actually do present as fact several times. (I QUOTE: "Trust me. There's no gap. You might think you see one, you might think that you see things precisely and clearly, but you don't.") Please note the IRONY as related to this statement: So I don't know why you would present your views as fact.
Look, I won't even go into the whether or not American artists are better/worst/out numbers/older/younger/unappreciated/whatever. It's an empty argument. You are wrong in your assumptions of me, though. I have hung out at cons with american artists. Infact, of the four cons I've been to, three times I went with friends who were there for art stuff. I've watched over years people who I love very much grow into wonderful artists, people who started with mere mimicry of japanese art form and find their own wonderful style. Who learn to use proportion and perspective in ways 80% of the Jfen art I see either can't or won't bother to strive for.
My original comment was meant, specifically, not to insult americans or raise japanese on a pedestal, but to defend those little oekaki scribbles. Stuff like this (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v120/erachan/Aviy/Elric029.gif?t=1189135040), which is messy and simple and vague but none-the-less makes me feel an emotion and tells me a tiny little story. This is the kind of art I love, regardless of whether or not it's by an american artist or a japanese one. And yes. I do find that good american artists, in a general sense, lean more toward one type of thing while japanese lean toward another. It's why I associate Americna artists with buffer characters, complete backgrounds, more interesting perspectives and why I associate japanese artists with interesting sketches and coloring and more emotional work.
Do you think I'm wrong? Fine. Go ahead. I've formed my opinions the only way anyone can: off my experience. I have, whatever you say, only presented them as my opinions. Disagree as you like, yelling at me that I'm wrong is remarkably unlikely to change my opinion, but if it makes you feel better, by all means.
I'm sorry you think you're shunned because you're an american artist. I love art. I love artists. I honestly prefer american styles to japanese, because the japanese habits of making everyone scrawny and young and a weepy uke drives me crazy. I'm sorry you found the implication that you have to 'catch up' insulting, but even if you weren't speaking specifically of anime/manga fandom artists, I was. And I do remember thinking, when I was younger, that all anime fanart by americans sucked. And I have long since stopped thinking that, as the fandoms I'm into grow, as the 'nromal' age for being an anime/manga fan goes up, so yes I feel like the American fanartists are catching up.
Talking Aviy talks /o/
Re: 36
(Anonymous) 2007-09-07 11:54 am (UTC)(link)