[ SECRET POST #2265 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2265 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 106 secrets from Secret Submission Post #324.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Taylor Swift makes really, really good pop music. You can say that the sentiments of the lyrics are pretty laughable (and they are) and that it's not "authentic" country (and it's not) but from a pop perspective, she (and her producers) make amazing songs.

And in regards to her public persona, yes, the whole small-town rise-from-obscurity thing is a put-on, but that's precisely what's so fascinating about Taylor Swift - the extent to which her persona is created, and the glimpses we see of what's behind it - because it really seems like she is just an insanely driven, ambitious person who's creating this image very intentionally to rise to the top, and the tension between those things is fascinating to me. But regardless, I don't think her persona has any influence on whether or not her songs are good.

[childings.livejournal.com]

Except that there are plenty of REAL small town nobodies who aspire to rise from obscurity and that doesn't happen anymore, in a music industry where you already have to be filthy rich or have a mommy or daddy in the recording industry to get anywhere. I don't really see how that's fascinating aside from being, like I said, laughable and awful

I miss the days when someone like Dolly Parton could become successful off their singing/songwriting ability (Swift isn't good at either by the way) despite coming from extremely modest means. That's basically the American dream -- working hard and developing a talent and becoming successful based on your own merits. Taylor Swift is pretty much the opposite of that and that's why I can't stand her.

[(Anonymous)]

I'm not saying she's a good person, and her prominence is certainly a result of a cultural / economic landscape that is in many ways deeply fucked up. But that's exactly what makes her so interesting as a pop figure - because she has figured out how to work the system so well, and because of what that indicates about what pop music is right now, and because it's interesting to see a person with what seems like such a stark divide between how they present themselves and who they are. I wouldn't want to be her, but she's interesting in the same way that people of massive ambition and talent often are.

And, again, besides anything else, she makes good pop music that I like to listen to, and on some level I'm still going to enjoy that pop music regardless of her persona.

[(Anonymous)]

It's all very clearly subjective, because I don't find anything about her fascinating at all, unless it's the extent of her lack of talent when required to do anything beyond her inane brand of tripe. (Go track down the live performance she did with Stevie Nicks. It was so atrocious that some of my friends who don't know who Swift is remember it.)

So talent, no. Not at all (which may be why she's still doing high school girly break up love songs - they aren't musically challenging at all). And I wouldn't call her drive "ambition", I'd call it "narcissism".

Then again, there are stars and music I enjoy that others wouldn't, so whatever flips your switch.

[(Anonymous)]

right? idk music history as well but thinking of the lived american dream "rags to riches stories" of old hollywood stars like Joan Crawford make Taylor Swifts supposed rise from obscurity so sad

[(Anonymous)]

ps just to clarify i mention Crawford cause she's somebody who worked very hard to craft a marketable image for herself like swift - except she actually came from nothing and was selfmade

[(Anonymous)]

YMMV, her songs are pretty generic. They don't bring anything to the table that we couldn't have gotten from the majority of the other female pop acts out there. It's pretty par for the course for teenage girl songwriting, and it would've been nice to get it from somebody more talented who didn't have parents rich enough to buy them a singing career for their birthday.

[(Anonymous)]

lol, please. her voice is weak. even with her incredibly easy to sing songs, and the existence of autotune, her voice sounds noticeably weaker than p much any other female singer played on the same radio stations as her. pink, for example, is also shit at singing live, but her producers recently have done a much better job of hiding it than swifts. same with katy perry. girl cant sing but aside from not telling her to knock off the vibratto, they do a good job of hiding it. lyrics are basic, songs are basic, built entirely on one unoriginal guitar bit. there is nothing new or innovative being done. i am not a big fan of pop but i can list a lot of other pop singers who do sometimes have unique elements in their songs. what exactly are her producers doing that is so special or great? she has maybe one or two recent songs that are cleanly produced, at least, but frankly a lot of her songs are a grating mess. i would take pink, lady gaga, or even katy Perry's producers before I'd take swifts. Perrys producer maybe incredibly repetitive and uninspired but for formulaic pop that sells well, its consistently done more professionally than swifts is

[(Anonymous)]

You're kidding right? I just had the (mis)fortune of hearing We Are Never Ever Getting Back Together for the first time today, thanks to the shit music taste of whoever controls the radio at work.

Nails on a fucking chalkboard. Ironically, my exact reaction was "what a fucking slut. You must regularly get about 9 cocks in your mouth at once to be able to open your mouth that wide and beller that loudly."