case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-03-30 03:26 pm

[ SECRET POST #2279 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2279 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 096 secrets from Secret Submission Post #326.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 (warning for rape) - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

NF

(Anonymous) 2013-03-30 09:38 pm (UTC)(link)
I'd rather that reblogged the stuff so I knew to unfollow you. Tumblr is a minefield of SJWs and it's better when you just admit what you are so the rest of us can stay away from you.
feotakahari: (Default)

Re: NF

[personal profile] feotakahari 2013-03-30 09:51 pm (UTC)(link)
Has anyone else noticed that, of the complainers on FS, the ones who complain about SJWs are the least likely to be logged in when they complain? It seems a little cowardly--commenters who lean SJW are often proudly logged in, so why not meet them on their own terms?

Re: NF

(Anonymous) 2013-03-30 09:55 pm (UTC)(link)
One reason is that some people who are very anti-SJW have had bad experiences with angry mobs of SJWs storming their online location and terrorizing them, and don't want to stick their necks out again. Others have heard about said angry mobs, and don't want to stick their necks out at all.

However, I do sometimes wonder how many anons are responsible for the very short "lol SJW" type remarks. It's probably more than just one.

Re: NF

(Anonymous) 2013-03-30 10:00 pm (UTC)(link)
maybe they don't want mobs of people from twitter or tumblr parachuting in to call them evil

not like that ever happens, wait, that totally happens, and it's completely reasonable not to want to worry about it
feotakahari: (Default)

Re: NF

[personal profile] feotakahari 2013-03-30 10:05 pm (UTC)(link)
As opposed to anons parachuting in to call people SJWs?

Re: NF

(Anonymous) 2013-03-30 10:10 pm (UTC)(link)
I mostly don't agree with people on here who are heavily anti-SJW; I mean, I don't really have strong feelings one way or the other. I think a lot of the more entrenched, bitter fighting is kind of silly and also regrettable. My point is more that it's not necessarily cowardly to want to be anon when having that conversation. Obviously it's not more justified when either side is piling on. I don't know how if that's really an argument either way, though; the fact that the 'other side' does something doesn't make it right.

So uh yeah. People aren't cowards for being anon, whatever their positions in the ongoing SJW arguments.

Re: NF

(Anonymous) 2013-03-30 10:13 pm (UTC)(link)
It's the mere fact that everything with SJWs is an argument why I go anon when I comment on SJW threads. I don't want all that negativity in my email.

Re: NF

(Anonymous) 2013-03-30 10:08 pm (UTC)(link)
AYRT

I'm anon because I don't have or want a DW account. I used to use openID but there was a problem with it for a long time that meant having to go anon four out of five times, so I stopped doing that.

On tumblr (the platform actually in question), I'm very open about not wanting anything to do with SJWs. I prefer rational thought and reality over emotional idealism that is carefully crafted to disregard facts and rationale.

Re: NF

(Anonymous) 2013-03-30 10:29 pm (UTC)(link)
I prefer rational thought and reality over emotional idealism that is carefully crafted to disregard facts and rationale.

I could never explain why Im uncomfortable with SJW and that is exactly it.

Re: NF

(Anonymous) 2013-04-01 06:49 pm (UTC)(link)
Ah, yes, "rational thought" - and funny how that always means gender essentialism based on crap science, homophobia based on crap sociology, racism based on crap anthropology and classism based on crap economics.

But people who care about social justice based on facts are just hysterical wimmim/gays/blacks/losers, amirite?

SIGH

Re: NF

(Anonymous) 2013-03-30 10:41 pm (UTC)(link)
Wow you just summed up my feelings in a nutshell! It makes so much sense why my sister is such a big SJWs, she's a huge emotional idealist...

Re: NF

(Anonymous) 2013-03-31 12:38 am (UTC)(link)
Couldn't have said that better myself.

Re: NF

(Anonymous) 2013-03-30 10:15 pm (UTC)(link)
SJWs tend to lean towards batshit. Who wants to get notifications of that? Only other SJWs.
cloud_riven: Bill from Pokemon side-eying to the left! Judging you! (skepticism skepticism)

Re: NF

[personal profile] cloud_riven 2013-03-30 10:34 pm (UTC)(link)
No. Fandom, including f!s, is already a mostly liberal space. And most of us here probably associate "SJW" with "slacktivist asshole," and the threads saying so are usually full of both anon and logged-in folk.
kamino_neko: Tedd from El Goonish Shive. Drawn by Dan Shive, coloured by Kamino Neko. (Default)

Re: NF

[personal profile] kamino_neko 2013-03-30 11:27 pm (UTC)(link)
And the anons are at least as likely to be SJWs. (Or at least spouting SJW talking points - hard to tell what percentage of the anons on either side are serious.)
insanenoodlyguy: (Awesomeface)

Re: NF

[personal profile] insanenoodlyguy 2013-03-30 10:51 pm (UTC)(link)
I always knew I was a paragon of manliness and courage.
feotakahari: (Default)

Re: NF

[personal profile] feotakahari 2013-03-31 03:07 am (UTC)(link)
For a self-proclaimed troll, you're a surprisingly decent fellow.

(Obligatory: http://princesstutu-tfln.tumblr.com/post/31549372139/photoset-first-image-is-princess-tutu-talking)

Re: NF

(Anonymous) 2013-03-31 12:36 am (UTC)(link)
I used to de-anon and then got a bunch of hate mail from you SJWs because ya'll didn't like what I had to say about some stupid issue or other. So now I remain anon at all times because even innocent comments are taken the wrong way and I have no intention of having my inbox being flooded by all your rants. :D

This way I say whatever the hell I like without worrying about receiving threatening messages.

Re: NF

(Anonymous) 2013-03-31 01:37 am (UTC)(link)
Maybe it's because they don't want people putting them on blacklists or stalking their posts to call them pieces of shit , or stalking their posts to tell people "omg they're a rape apologist" but not give ANY EVIDENCE when asked about it.

Yes I've seen this happen. SJ itself is a noble goal when done right and with a REASONABLE attitude. But SJWs they do it all wrong and give social justice a bad name. Which in my opinion means it's perfectly justified to call them out. I hate seeing people go "SJWs can be pains but they mean well/have good intentions so it's okay"

All that tells me about this community is that if someone wants to get away with terrible behavior all they have to do is hide behind a "good cause".

Yes I separate Social Justice and SJW. Social Justice is the good side, and SJW is the fucked up side.

-JJ

Re: NF

(Anonymous) 2013-03-30 10:39 pm (UTC)(link)
How is reblogging stuff about different cultures being n SJW? O__o
insanenoodlyguy: (Default)

I just ate Sushi with chopsticks for lunch. Don't give a fuck. Thug life.

[personal profile] insanenoodlyguy 2013-03-30 10:54 pm (UTC)(link)
I believe they are saying rather that they are worried that by blogging about such things, they will become the target of said SJW types, perhaps because of appropriation and the like.

Re: I just ate Sushi with chopsticks for lunch. Don't give a fuck. Thug life.

(Anonymous) 2013-03-30 11:23 pm (UTC)(link)
...Wow. So it's politically incorrect to even admire other cultures now?

Re: I just ate Sushi with chopsticks for lunch. Don't give a fuck. Thug life.

(Anonymous) 2013-03-30 11:32 pm (UTC)(link)
genewilderyoumustbenewhere.gif

Re: I just ate Sushi with chopsticks for lunch. Don't give a fuck. Thug life.

(Anonymous) 2013-03-30 11:42 pm (UTC)(link)
Well I knew about the whole cultural appropriation(like wearing kimono's, "native feathers", etc) or weeaboo's who wish they were asian and shit. But I didn't know it's controversial to even like a picture of like... a temple or a cultures native dress. How is awareness of how other people live cultural appropriation?
(btw I'm not attacking anybody with this, just generally confused, so I guess I really am new)

Re: I just ate Sushi with chopsticks for lunch. Don't give a fuck. Thug life.

(Anonymous) 2013-03-30 11:52 pm (UTC)(link)
AYRT

Sorry, I didn't mean to confuse you. And I'm sorry for forgetting that sometimes we actually DO get new people here. I didn't mean to strike down what you said as though it was of no consequence. I was actually responding to your earnest reply to a sarcastic comment.

It's been so long since I've seen anyone misread Noodly's tone on here that I forget it is possible. His icons are an indicator of his tone, but if you read enough of his comments over time you get a feel for his personality and therefore his tone.