[ SECRET POST #2299 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2299 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

#9 is a moving .gif.



01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Kuroko no Basuke]


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.
[Milestone Inc./Radilgy/Karous]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Glee/RPS]


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.
[The Following]


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________














[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]















10. [SPOILERS for Resident Evil 6]



__________________________________________________



11. [SPOILERS for Doctor Who]



__________________________________________________



12. [SPOILERS for Homestuck]



__________________________________________________



13. [SPOILERS for Southland]



__________________________________________________
















[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]















14. [WARNING for ?? something]



__________________________________________________



15. [WARNING for abuse]



__________________________________________________



16. [WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________



17. [WARNING for rape]

[Spartacus / Once Upon a Time]


__________________________________________________



18. [WARNING for animal abuse]




















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #328.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Literature

[(Anonymous)]

Have you ever wanted to read a book, but avoided reading it because you were afraid you might be too stupid to understand it?

I used to do this when I was a teenager.

Re: Literature

[intrigueing]

No, because my mother would ban me from reading books because she thought I was too stupid to understand them until I got older, so I would purposely try to sneak off to read really difficult books just to rebel against her.

I got through Bleak House at the age of 10 through sheer stubbornness. And no, I didn't understand half of it.

Re: Literature

[(Anonymous)]

I actually probably started avoiding books because I thought they were too boring. Nothing in particular, but I do remember my reluctance to even touch the "literature" section of Borders - I'll stick to my awesomely fun young adult novels, tyvm. I don't really care about tigers on rafts and purple metaphors for rape or whatever. You're not ~deep~, books, you're just pretentious.

Re: Literature

[(Anonymous)]

Hi, how about go fuck yourself?

I mean, yeah, some books are just pretentious. But not everything that's not YA is pretentious just because it's not your thing.

Re: Literature

[(Anonymous)]

This is probably true, but most "literature" I've come across has been rather dry and stuffy. I'm not inclined to trawl through the section trying to find the golden eggs when I know there's a whole other section of books that generally don't sound like they've set out to either a) put me to sleep, or b) make me question my IQ.

I like my books to be fun.

Re: Literature

[(Anonymous)]

If a piece of fiction has ever made you question your IQ, then you're not as smart as you think you are.

Re: Literature

[(Anonymous)]

Oh come on, seriously?

Re: Literature

[(Anonymous)]

Boo-hoo, somebody likes genre fiction over ~literature.~

Yes, I'm serious. How dare I like my books to be FUN instead of using them to make myself look smart. I know I'm smart - the fuck do I need to be reading The Brothers Karamazov on the bus to prove it?

Re: Literature

[(Anonymous)]

Yes. You're very intelligent. That's why you've written off a rather broad category of fiction and are trolling people over it.

Re: Literature

[(Anonymous)]

Some people read The Brotherz Karamazov because they like it. Can you seriously not understand that?

I don't mind that you like genre fiction. I like genre fiction. A lot. I mind that you seem to think that the only function of literary fiction is to make oneself look smart. That is dumb.

I know you're trolling. I hope it makes you happy.

Re: Literature

[intrigueing]

Ha ha how about no.

Re: Literature

[(Anonymous)]

/tiniest violin

Re: Literature

[(Anonymous)]

I like reading serious literature. Why do you think that I'm pretentious? Why are you insulting me? I don't insult you for your choice of reading material.

Re: Literature

[(Anonymous)]

I never insulted you, I was talking about the books themselves. I have nothing against the people who read them, I just think most things labeled "literature" (as opposed to genre fiction) sound...pretentious.

You do seem a little sensitive, though. Hit a nerve, did I?

Re: Literature

[(Anonymous)]

There's good "literature" and there's bad "literature", just like there's good and bad YA stuff. Literature may not be your thing and you may find it boring, both of which are fine and completely valid. Writing off everything in that extremely broad category as pretentious is ridiculous, though.

Re: Literature

[(Anonymous)]

Possibly, and if someone were to rec me literature that they found really interesting, I would be inclined to read it. But if I'm in a book store, looking to buy a book, I'm going to avoid the literature section and browse through the genre fiction instead. Because that's what I'm drawn to.

TBH, though, I'm really fucking amused at all the butthurt my opinion seems to have caused. Usually I get told I'm too old/smart/whatever to be reading genre fiction, so it warms my immature little heart to see people who like literature get bent out of shape that somebody doesn't like their class of books.

Re: Literature

[(Anonymous)]

I'll be honest, "literature" became a lot more interesting to me when I could take what I read at face value instead of having to worry about whether a character wearing red socks represented blood on his hands or whatever. Not to mention being able to quit reading a book I hated without having to worry about grades.

Re: Literature

[(Anonymous)]

Haha, this is probably true. w2g, high school, for making me hate all the books you tried shoving down my throat!

Like I've said upthread, I would probably read something that somebody recced me and told me was really fun and interesting, but given my own choice, I'm making a bee-line for the genre fiction. I feel like I'm less likely to "strike out" with books in that section than books in the literature section.

Re: Literature

[(Anonymous)]

I had a similar attitude as OP for the first few years after high school precisely because of what and how I had to read for four years. It didn't help that my school had a small group of pretentious students who thought they were better than everyone because they exclusively read literature for fun. Every teacher in the English department fawned all over them, which just made those students even more insufferable.

I've since gone back and read many of the literature staples of high school that I never personally had to read and found some to be very good, some to be even worse than I suspected when I was younger, and some just kinda meh. Being able to set down anything I didn't like and move onto something else was liberating. I also got a lot more out of reading them for myself than anything I had to read in school because I didn't feel like someone was beating me over the head with A Moral.

let's try another tact

[(Anonymous)]

I actually probably started avoiding books because I thought they were too stupid. Nothing in particular, but I do remember my reluctance to even touch the "Young Adult" section of Borders - I'll stick to my meaty and challenging literature, tyvm. I don't really care about post-apocalypses or fairies or paranormal romances or whatever. You're not ~fun~, books, you're just childish and dumb.

Re: let's try another tact

[(Anonymous)]

Yep I'm the same, I hate to admit I tend to judge people who only read YA.

Re: Literature

[(Anonymous)]

well, here's that "you are what you like" false thing again o_o didn't expect to see it so soon again

well, op, i get what you mean

you can like pretentious things and not be pretentious things

i was kind of surprised when everyone jumped you like that -- your wording didn't strike me as provocative, but just matter of fact vOv

if context matters here, i like pretty much all books ever, even the pretentious ones :P

Re: Literature

[(Anonymous)]

*and not be pretentious yourself

Re: Literature

[brooms]

Y E S! rn, it's andrew bacevich.

the most infamous of my terrors (now partially abated) - james joyce! oh my god. IN MY DEFENSE, english isn't my mothertongue and the very first joyce book i ever tried was finnegan's wake. in english.

i read dubliners recently and that went much more smoothly, tho. sweet victory~

Re: Literature

[(Anonymous)]

Andrew Bacevich rules! You should definitely read him. I've always found him nice and comprehensible and straight-forward, at least.

Joyce... Finnegan's Wake... yeah, that, not so much. Especially for someone reading in a second language, but it's more than hard enough for anyone. I feel the exact same way. There's no need for any defense. Dubliners is great tho!