case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-05-25 04:03 pm

[ SECRET POST #2335 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2335 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________




















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 095 secrets from Secret Submission Post #334.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
dreemyweird: (Default)

[personal profile] dreemyweird 2013-05-25 08:14 pm (UTC)(link)
In all honesty, YKINMK applies to pretty much any fandom preference.
writerserenyty: (Default)

[personal profile] writerserenyty 2013-05-25 08:51 pm (UTC)(link)
Pretty much this; it's become kind of a general term at this point.
dreemyweird: (Default)

[personal profile] dreemyweird 2013-05-25 09:01 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, and I didn't even mean the term itself, rather the general idea.

(Anonymous) 2013-05-25 09:07 pm (UTC)(link)
YKINMK is pretty much enabling of things like rape and pedophilia and people who engage in it disgust me.
dreemyweird: (Default)

[personal profile] dreemyweird 2013-05-25 09:16 pm (UTC)(link)
Rape and paedophilia in fiction=/=real rape and paedophilia. It is pretty much like saying "detective novels enable murder, and people who engage in it disgust me".

Even if you are disgusted by the pleasure they derive from it, not by the mere fact that somebody writes these things, so what? Somebody disgusts you; what does it mean? What consequences should it have? There are always going to be people whom you find disgusting for this or other reason, there's no fixing this (and nor should there be, I daresay).

(Anonymous) 2013-05-25 09:48 pm (UTC)(link)
Depiction of rape and pedophilia = condonement. It contributes to an overriding culture that says it's okay. People who get off on that stuff are disgusting and should be put into prison.
dreemyweird: (Default)

[personal profile] dreemyweird 2013-05-25 09:56 pm (UTC)(link)
Sorry, I think you're a troll. Putting people into prison for reading certain kinds of fiction is a thousand times worse than producing narratives of any degree of repulsing.

(Anonymous) 2013-05-25 10:29 pm (UTC)(link)
Typical F!S, anyone who has an "extreme" opinion is a troll. I think you're the troll, for wasting my time on what could have been a fruitful debate.
dreemyweird: (Default)

[personal profile] dreemyweird 2013-05-25 10:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, you're partly right, normally I don't like the tendency to call everyone who disagrees with f!sers "a troll". This is frustrating.

In this case, however, I see a person whose statements are harsh, promote the ultimate form of Thought Police-like systems (not even simply "put everyone who writes/reads rape and paedophilia into prison", but "put everyone who gets off to this into prison"), who states that there's an "overriding culture that says that [rape and paedophilia] are okay", and who displays poor understanding of the way fiction works.

True, you may not be a troll, but do you really want to argue with me in a reasonable and level-headed way? Hypothetically I wouldn't even mind. One of the difficulties, however, is that we appear to have very different moral grounds, and, since morality is a highly subjective and often irrational thing, I am unsure if we would be able to find a point from which we could start the discussion.
Edited 2013-05-25 22:42 (UTC)

(Anonymous) 2013-05-25 10:47 pm (UTC)(link)
Your morality is "it's okay to get off to rape and pedophilia if it's fiction. If you disagree, it's because you don't understand fiction."

And you cry "Thought Police!" and deny the existence of rape culture. Damn, you're good, you got me there.
dreemyweird: (Default)

[personal profile] dreemyweird 2013-05-25 10:53 pm (UTC)(link)
No, that's not what I am saying. In fact, my previous comment did not mention the exact aspect of my position I was referring to, but my point is that depicting rape=/=codonement, and yes, I think that you understand the mechanics of literature poorly if you disagree with this.

It would've been slightly more valid if you said "sympathetic depiction of rape=codonement", and even in this case... well, all right, we could argue about this case, if you want.

I did not deny the existence of rape culture, I simply doubt that it's overriding.

And there's a big difference between proposing to put people into prison for reading things and thinking that somebody understands something the wrong way. Seriously, are you comparing the situations?
dethtoll: (Default)

[personal profile] dethtoll 2013-05-26 01:13 am (UTC)(link)
forget it dreemy it's anontown
celestinenox: (Default)

[personal profile] celestinenox 2013-05-26 02:52 am (UTC)(link)
Depends on the depiction.

Is it portrayed as a valid form of love and caring? Or is it portrayed as something terrible that damages the victim?

If people could not explore the topic in fiction, that would be a denial of rape culture, in that it would be silencing a form of speaking out about the subject. Please be a little less general in your statements of what equals condoning rape and pedophilia.

(Anonymous) 2013-05-26 08:49 am (UTC)(link)
Well, then off to the death row with all those sick fucks who watch movies like Saw and Hostel - clearly, they are all potential torturers and serial killers or condone the actions of those who are. All them hundreds of thousands of'em!
tyger66: (Default)

OH GOD

[personal profile] tyger66 2013-05-25 11:28 pm (UTC)(link)
This again? Don't we have this argument at least once a week?

I don't personally enjoy rape or pedophilia in fanfic, but I don't think that those who read/write it are ACTUAL rapists and pedophiles.
dreemyweird: (Default)

Re: OH GOD

[personal profile] dreemyweird 2013-05-25 11:32 pm (UTC)(link)
...do we have this argument at least once a week? Wow, I thought f!s was slightly more adequate.
tyger66: (Default)

Re: OH GOD

[personal profile] tyger66 2013-05-25 11:39 pm (UTC)(link)
I was exaggerating a bit.

But this argument certainly does come up with (slightly disturbing) regularity, especially when there's a secret that could possibly be used as a leaping-off point.

(Anonymous) 2013-05-26 01:37 am (UTC)(link)
Yeeeeeaaah I'm a rabid feminist, with rape fantasies, I've had from a young age. IRL I've ~attacked men who've intruded into my personal space. I'm a gentle geek person in a LTR with a woman and our baby. Sexually I'm a sadomasochist. Politically I've actively fought against rape culture and sexual violence. Consent is EVERYTHING. There is NO cognitive dissonance in my brain, but I am SICK of ignorant assumptions like yours yada yada.

(Anonymous) 2013-05-26 01:43 am (UTC)(link)
LOL


no.