Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-05-25 04:03 pm
[ SECRET POST #2335 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2335 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 095 secrets from Secret Submission Post #334.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-25 09:07 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
Even if you are disgusted by the pleasure they derive from it, not by the mere fact that somebody writes these things, so what? Somebody disgusts you; what does it mean? What consequences should it have? There are always going to be people whom you find disgusting for this or other reason, there's no fixing this (and nor should there be, I daresay).
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-25 09:48 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-25 10:29 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
In this case, however, I see a person whose statements are harsh, promote the ultimate form of Thought Police-like systems (not even simply "put everyone who writes/reads rape and paedophilia into prison", but "put everyone who gets off to this into prison"), who states that there's an "overriding culture that says that [rape and paedophilia] are okay", and who displays poor understanding of the way fiction works.
True, you may not be a troll, but do you really want to argue with me in a reasonable and level-headed way? Hypothetically I wouldn't even mind. One of the difficulties, however, is that we appear to have very different moral grounds, and, since morality is a highly subjective and often irrational thing, I am unsure if we would be able to find a point from which we could start the discussion.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-25 10:47 pm (UTC)(link)And you cry "Thought Police!" and deny the existence of rape culture. Damn, you're good, you got me there.
no subject
It would've been slightly more valid if you said "sympathetic depiction of rape=codonement", and even in this case... well, all right, we could argue about this case, if you want.
I did not deny the existence of rape culture, I simply doubt that it's overriding.
And there's a big difference between proposing to put people into prison for reading things and thinking that somebody understands something the wrong way. Seriously, are you comparing the situations?
no subject
no subject
Is it portrayed as a valid form of love and caring? Or is it portrayed as something terrible that damages the victim?
If people could not explore the topic in fiction, that would be a denial of rape culture, in that it would be silencing a form of speaking out about the subject. Please be a little less general in your statements of what equals condoning rape and pedophilia.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-26 08:49 am (UTC)(link)OH GOD
I don't personally enjoy rape or pedophilia in fanfic, but I don't think that those who read/write it are ACTUAL rapists and pedophiles.
Re: OH GOD
Re: OH GOD
But this argument certainly does come up with (slightly disturbing) regularity, especially when there's a secret that could possibly be used as a leaping-off point.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-26 01:37 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-26 01:43 am (UTC)(link)no.