Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-07-06 03:21 pm
[ SECRET POST #2377 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2377 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 071 secrets from Secret Submission Post #340.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

"Ableist language"?
(Anonymous) 2013-07-06 10:06 pm (UTC)(link)Re: "Ableist language"?
(Anonymous) 2013-07-06 10:16 pm (UTC)(link)What I really love is that we're handing the next generation this whole new list of taboo words they can use to offend their elders.
Re: "Ableist language"?
(Anonymous) 2013-07-06 10:50 pm (UTC)(link)Re: "Ableist language"?
Look, I can get with the "ableist!" activists when they say we shouldn't call people retards, because we shouldn't. But when it comes to stupid, dumb, lame and crazy -- when not used as synonyms for for actual disability or illness -- I just can't seem to give even a little crap.
Re: "Ableist language"?
(Anonymous) 2013-07-07 12:10 am (UTC)(link)Re: "Ableist language"?
(Anonymous) 2013-07-07 12:56 am (UTC)(link)Re: "Ableist language"?
Re: "Ableist language"?
Re: "Ableist language"?
(Anonymous) 2013-07-06 11:14 pm (UTC)(link)Re: "Ableist language"?
(Anonymous) 2013-07-06 11:15 pm (UTC)(link)Re: "Ableist language"?
Re: "Ableist language"?
I hate hearing people whine about how "omg I can't say anything anymore." You can say whatever you damn well please. And then other people can react however they damn well please.
Re: "Ableist language"?
Re: "Ableist language"?
Someone who has an actual mental disability would not be called stupid, because them making a more reasonable choice isn't something they could have done if they just decided to care/think about/pay more attention to it.
If you call a mentally disabled person stupid, that's offensive, because you're implying they should have magically been able to act differently. If you call someone with no mental disabilities stupid, you're just insulting their ignorance/poor judgement/lazy thinking/lack of forethought.
But some people decide that they'd like to make sure that no one can ever be insulted or judged for behaving in a colossally ill-advised manner, even if they DO have the mental faculty to behave more reasonably.
Re: "Ableist language"?
(Anonymous) 2013-07-07 01:07 am (UTC)(link)Mentally disabled person (and not bothered by 'stupid' except in specific contects) here- how can you be sure the person you're calling stupid isn't disabled? Outside of Down syndrome and a few other things you can't really tell by looking.
Re: "Ableist language"?
How can you tell they're not physically disabled?
How can you tell they're not depressed?
How can you tell they're not sick?
How can you tell they're not just upset?
How can you tell they want to talk to you?
How can you tell they are enjoying the party?
Re: "Ableist language"?
(Anonymous) 2013-07-07 07:57 am (UTC)(link)Re: "Ableist language"?
But this kind of just strengthens my opinion that the word "stupid" is kind of jerky and pointless if you're describing a person wholesale, disabled or not. I find that "stupid" is a much more useful descriptor when you're referring to actions or behaviors.
If I may ask -- what contexts do you find the word bothersome? Just curious to know about various people's perspectives on these kinds of things.
Re: "Ableist language"?
(Anonymous) 2013-07-07 01:33 am (UTC)(link)2. If the answer to 1. is NO, then you are still allowed to use the words "stupid" and "dumb."
...I say this as someone of average intelligence who was called "retard" throughout the entirety of the time that I was trapped in the snake pit that laughingly passed itself off as a functioning school in the provincial education system in my area.
Jumping on "stupid" and "dumb" is distracting society at large from the actual issues that exist. But we all know that's what SJWs are really trying to do, anyway.
Re: "Ableist language"?
...Just hang around with people who aren't dumb and stupid about this shit. :P
Re: "Ableist language"?
(Anonymous) 2013-07-07 02:28 am (UTC)(link)Re: "Ableist language"?
(Anonymous) 2013-07-07 07:08 am (UTC)(link)I don't think it should be considered ableist, but I do think the whole internet would benefit from an "if you can't say anything nice don't say anything at all" attitude.
Re: "Ableist language"?
(Anonymous) 2013-07-07 08:19 am (UTC)(link)