Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-08-04 03:31 pm
[ SECRET POST #2406 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2406 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 077 secrets from Secret Submission Post #344.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-08-04 10:23 pm (UTC)(link)some people of various sexes look more like (cis) men, and some people of various sexes look more like (cis) women
i'm a cis woman who is the spitting image of my cis dad when he was my age
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-08-04 10:56 pm (UTC)(link)yeah I've known some trans* people who were either able to pass before going through hormones/surgery, or who weren't financially privileged but still worked really hard and saved to be able to transition
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-08-04 11:00 pm (UTC)(link)As much as you look like your dad, I'm pretty sure you don't have full-face five o'clock shadow, a prominent Adam's apple, absolutely no tits, etc., etc. To use another Avengers example, I've read a story where Bruce Banner (as played by Mark Ruffalo) was FTM trans*. And I'm sorry, but given his life and his appearance, I just don't buy it.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-08-04 11:03 pm (UTC)(link)I can't.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-08-05 12:23 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-08-05 12:39 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-08-05 01:30 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-08-04 11:55 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-08-05 12:23 am (UTC)(link)You are the exception. The vast majority of women do not have a full-face five o'clock shadow. When we see a full-face five o'clock shadow, there is more than enough basis to assume that person is male, not female.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-08-05 12:45 am (UTC)(link)You don't know how that other person identifies. Hell, for all you know, that other person might not identify with the gender binary at all. It's up to them to make that call, not you.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-08-05 01:04 am (UTC)(link)Is this how insane people sound when they talk?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-08-05 01:22 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-08-05 01:30 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-08-05 04:03 am (UTC)(link)anybody who this does not apply to is the exception, not the rule.
NAYRT
(Anonymous) 2013-08-05 02:56 am (UTC)(link)The other anon is correct, your case is highly unusual, and anon's assumption will likely hold true for the vast majority of people anon meets in their lifetime. Generalizations that are firmly grounded in fact are not evil, as long as they are not held to be absolutes and used to try to force people to conform or to discriminate against them if they don't.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-08-05 06:15 am (UTC)(link)That doesn't mean that they *can't* be a woman, but it's less likely.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-08-05 01:12 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-08-05 01:15 am (UTC)(link)Sorry, I fucked up my HTML, I didn't intend to sound like I was talking to you in a weird snake voice.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-08-05 01:21 am (UTC)(link)Brilliant recovery.