fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #2434 ]

⌈ Secret Post #2434 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

__________________________________________________

02.

[A7X]

__________________________________________________

03.

[Stargate Atlantis]

__________________________________________________

04.

[Merlin]

__________________________________________________

05.

[Audrey Cooper, Twin Peaks]

__________________________________________________

06.

[Fire Emblem: Awakening]

__________________________________________________

07.

[Avril Lavigne, Tank Girl]

__________________________________________________

08.

[Meet the Robinsons]

__________________________________________________

09.

[Blood+]

__________________________________________________

10.

[Monty Python's Flying Circus]

__________________________________________________

11.

[Valentine Morgenstern, The Mortal Instruments]

__________________________________________________

Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 062 secrets from Secret Submission Post #348.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

Nope. An agnostic won't believe one way or the other without proof.

I can't agree with Atheists cause we have no proof that God(s) don't exist. I can't agree with Theists cause we have no proof that God(s) exist.

Sorry, but no, hon.

We don't have any proof anything doesn't exist, you can't prove a negative.

But I can guarantee you don't apply that logic to everything else in your life.

Statistics disagrees with you.

With the specific example of a higher being, however, we'd have to come up with some set rules for what a God requires, though, and then prove those don't exist. It's the first part that's difficult, not the second.

That's not what atheism is. An atheist doesn't claim to know that gods don't exist; they simply do not extend their belief to the claim that gods DO exist. Knowledge and belief are different things. Most atheists are also agnostic. You can be both.

Then they aren't Atheist. They're plain Agnostic.

Nope. They assert no belief that gods exist. They abstain from theism. That makes them atheists. You don't need to claim certain knowledge that gods don't exist in order to be an atheist.

No... that's not true. You can be an agnostic atheist or an agnostic theist. Belief has nothing to do with the knowledge. An agnostic is someone who doesn't claim to know--basically 90% of the planet, including lots of devoted believers. Surveys show the VAST majority of atheists are agnostic atheists.

You can be both, sure, but some atheists are not both. They say point-blank that it's a fact that supernatural forces don't exist because [insert various reasons]. Those are the people - usually the loudest versions, on the internet in particular - agnostics might be trying to differentiate themselves from.

You can be both, sure, but some atheists are not both. They say point-blank that it's a fact that supernatural forces don't exist because [insert various reasons]. Those are the people - usually the loudest versions, on the internet in particular - agnostics might be trying to differentiate themselves from.

Nope. So-called gnostic atheists and New Atheists (who are currently most vocal) are two different things. New Atheists tend to take the pragmatic position after Russell that in the absence of proof, disbelief is the most reasonable position.

Someone is ignorant of almost all atheist and theist writing on the issue of proof over the last century.

Someone else has got way too much time on their hands if they ARE well-versed in such an esoteric subject, and is incredibly full of themselves to boot. F!S ≠ academia.

The beliefs of people you are talking to are hardly "esoteric." If you're clueless about those beliefs, you could, I don't know, ask a question or do a basic google search.

*shakes head* Jesus fucking christ. Not everyone subscribes by YOUR definition. I go by mine, someone else goes by theirs.

Fuck off, you fucking asshole.

We have enough religion wank between the various Theists.

Except definitions of words are not like opinions...you don't get to have your own.

Yes, especially when your own beliefs involve fibbing about entire groups.

In this instance? Yes. You do.

Cause when it comes to religion, the definition changes all the fucking time.

[ SECRET POST #2434 ]

Re: Did you parents ever think you were gay (when you weren't)

Re: Did you parents ever think you were gay (when you weren't)

Re: Did you parents ever think you were gay (when you weren't)

Re: Did you parents ever think you were gay (when you weren't)

Re: Did you parents ever think you were gay (when you weren't)

Re: Did you parents ever think you were gay (when you weren't)

Re: Did you parents ever think you were gay (when you weren't)

Re: Did you parents ever think you were gay (when you weren't)

Re: Did you parents ever think you were gay (when you weren't)

Re: Did you parents ever think you were gay (when you weren't)

no subject

no subject

Re: Did you parents ever think you were gay (when you weren't)

Re: Did you parents ever think you were gay (when you weren't)

Re: Did you parents ever think you were gay (when you weren't)

Re: Did you parents ever think you were gay (when you weren't)