Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-09-02 06:49 pm
[ SECRET POST #2435 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2435 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 049 secrets from Secret Submission Post #348.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-02 11:04 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-02 11:06 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
The most obvious jumping out to me being being appropriation as a substantial or meaningful criticism, single frame of reference of the kyriarchy, and most centrally - tribal politics.
no subject
no subject
I kind of hate the term. I've been active in IRL political activism of various sorts for over a quarter century and fighting for actual good in the world (online or off) is not the same as having Tumblr flamewars.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-02 23:19 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-03 06:16 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-06 02:27 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-02 11:13 pm (UTC)(link)You can be all for social justice, without being one of those labeled as SJWs and seen as...extreme.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Take the Selective Service, for example. Some people think that having men register when they turn 18, and not women, is sexist because it means the men have a chance of being forcibly drafted, so they want women to register, too. Others think that it would be sexist to force the women to register, because males would put themselves at risk to protect their female comrades and would rather the Service was scrapped altogether. Or gay marriage; some people think that marriage itself is a ridiculous, antiquated ritual and that an enlightened society would be free of it. Others think that it's a way to bring two sets of family and friends together to celebrate a relationship (or something like that) so everybody should have an equal shot at getting one. We can't agree on an endgame, never mind how to get there.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-02 23:48 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
...but what about us selective service objectors who are women?
Re: ...but what about us selective service objectors who are women?
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-03 09:27 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-03 02:34 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-03 07:41 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-03 05:12 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-02 11:14 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-02 11:17 pm (UTC)(link)Topics come up, and people argue about them but I don't think we have two teams who always only agree with their teammates.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-02 11:20 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-02 23:45 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-02 23:56 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-02 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)but back when fs was on lj and we got crossovers from the really extremist communities there? not so much
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-02 23:57 (UTC) - Expandthis anon speaks the truth
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-03 00:29 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-02 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-03 00:00 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
I think the conflict on Fandom Secret between people who believe in "social justice" and people who hate "social justice" is based almost entirely around strawmen. If both sides bothered listening to each other, I suspect they'd agree on at least fifty percent of the relevant issues.
Tumblr is still a shrieking hive of insanity, though.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-03 00:02 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-03 01:05 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-03 01:38 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-03 07:43 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-04 00:26 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
I WISH TO PURSUE MARITAL RELATIONS WITH YOUR BRAIN
This has made talking on either side of the issue...extremely difficult.
I'm not gonna lie, I seriously considered keeping quiet about Robin Thicke's misogyny because I didn't want to be connected to the asshats who got pissed off at Macklemore because he didn't do pro-gay rights exactly the way said asshats wanted. When trying to fit as complex a situation as homophobia and gay rights into a 3-minute song, the fact that some things had to be simplified for the lyrics is okay. No one thinks Same Love is the be-all-end-all primer on gay rights. It's a fucking song (and video), not a treatsie on gay rights. *headdesk* And yet, while it seems innocuous to some people, we need to talk about the atrocity of Thicke's song and his video, about the fact this music so blatantly turns women into sex objects, and that this man has a child - a son - and has an extraordinary influence on many other sons in this world.
These two issues shouldn't be on two different sides of the spectrum. And yet, they are, and this drives me batshit crazy every time it happens.
tl;dr - I agree with you, OP, and I wish more people would understand this.
Re: I WISH TO PURSUE MARITAL RELATIONS WITH YOUR BRAIN
Re: I WISH TO PURSUE MARITAL RELATIONS WITH YOUR BRAIN
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-03 21:46 (UTC) - ExpandRe: I WISH TO PURSUE MARITAL RELATIONS WITH YOUR BRAIN
no subject
(no subject)
Sorry, but could someone explain...
(Anonymous) 2013-09-03 04:50 am (UTC)(link)Re: Sorry, but could someone explain...
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-03 05:00 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Sorry, but could someone explain...
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-03 04:57 am (UTC)(link)Do people not understand the concept of unfollowing people?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-03 09:24 am (UTC)(link)Fact is: A group is always measured by its loudest and most annoying people. Again, in both cases.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-03 12:17 pm (UTC)(link)Basically what he does, from morning to night, is reply (or even butt in in other people's conversation) to posts addressing like 10000000 social issues. I think it's come to a point where it's completely ridiculous honestly. (And btw, has he got any life outside the internet?)
Also, many posts usually end up with calls to white people needing to shut up because they have privilege so they just have to shut up on 99% topics and that's it. And well, sometimes I've got the urge to point out that, 'hey, I guess I'm white and privileged, you are basically insulting me indirectly 50 times a day', only of course I would never do that because hey, that would mean I'm white, privileged and an ungrateful bitch on too of that.
BUT JESUS, I feel like they want to convert me into racism with this behavior. I'd rather not, but I swear it seems like that's their goal.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-03 07:52 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-08 11:26 am (UTC)(link)