Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-01-12 03:39 pm
[ SECRET POST #2567 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2567 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

Notes:
Tumblr and/or social justice in and of themselves aren't fandoms, unfortunately.
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 077 secrets from Secret Submission Post #367.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

so apparently I'm about to ragequit Sherlock (SPOILERS S3E3 in the comments)
Re: so apparently I'm about to ragequit Sherlock (SPOILERS S3E3 in the comments)
WHYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
W H??? Y???
Re: so apparently I'm about to ragequit Sherlock (SPOILERS S3E3 in the comments)
(Anonymous) 2014-01-12 10:34 pm (UTC)(link)Re: so apparently I'm about to ragequit Sherlock (SPOILERS S3E3 in the comments)
Lemme bury myself okay. Just damn call me when there's an Irene who isn't a love interest and a Moriarty who isN'T UbIQUITOUS AS THE BLOODY SMELL OF THE BLOODY LIVERPOOL CHEESES
Re: so apparently I'm about to ragequit Sherlock (SPOILERS S3E3 in the comments)
(Anonymous) 2014-01-13 12:44 am (UTC)(link)Re: so apparently I'm about to ragequit Sherlock (SPOILERS S3E3 in the comments)
(Anonymous) 2014-01-13 01:15 am (UTC)(link)Re: so apparently I'm about to ragequit Sherlock (SPOILERS S3E3 in the comments)
(Anonymous) 2014-01-13 01:17 am (UTC)(link)To be honest, Holmes having an archenemy who continues indefinitely and overshadows his whole career is rather minimizing. Moriarty's dark-mirror effect works perfectly well posthumously.
Re: so apparently I'm about to ragequit Sherlock (SPOILERS S3E3 in the comments)
What do the creators of the adaptations do? They grab their bag of salt and dance around, throwing handfuls of salt in their damn macaroni. Quite naturally, the food becomes quite inedible. STAHP with cheesiness. Do you seriously think that ACD's stories would have been improved if the poor guy made Moriarty commit all the crimes Holmes solves? No? Then why do you think that out of your stupid n episodes n/2 should contain Moriarty? HOW COME in 1954 Sheldon Reynolds could film a 29-episode adaptation without mentioning Moriarty once, but in 2013 you cannot make an adaptation without SHUTTING UP ABOUT THE DAMN MORIARTY?
I'm sick of omnipotent omnipresent archnemeses. I'm sick of Irene-the-love-interest-and-simultaneously-SURHPRISEHH-MORIARTY. GO AWAY. I just want some humane, interesting antagonists who were present in abundance in the Holmes stories. I want to see the Rucastles. I want to see Ryder. I want to see the dog from COPP GIVE ME THE DOG. I'll take this dog over Moriarty in no bloody time at all.
haha sorry I've got a bad case of feelings
Re: so apparently I'm about to ragequit Sherlock (SPOILERS S3E3 in the comments)
(Anonymous) 2014-01-13 12:45 am (UTC)(link)Re: so apparently I'm about to ragequit Sherlock (SPOILERS S3E3 in the comments)
Re: so apparently I'm about to ragequit Sherlock (SPOILERS S3E3 in the comments)
I think people who are fans of John and some Johnlock fans should be pretty happy. For me, the appeal of a Sherlock Holmes adaptation is about the character of Sherlock Holmes and the mysteries.
Re: so apparently I'm about to ragequit Sherlock (SPOILERS S3E3 in the comments)
Damnit, this contradictory bullshit is what sucked me into watching the show in the first place, and what sucked me into watching the rest of season 2 even though I swore Sherlock off after A Scandal in Belgravia, and it's probably going to do the same with season 3 as well even though I swore I wouldn't watch it.
*shakes fist*
Re: so apparently I'm about to ragequit Sherlock (SPOILERS S3E3 in the comments)
(Anonymous) 2014-01-13 04:04 am (UTC)(link)Unfortunately I'm pretty sure most casual viewers don't know all that many ACD antagonists in general, so I assume the people in charge of remakes worry that introducing new people, even if they're canon, may turn off viewers. It's lazy, but eh. :\ That's my theory, anyway.
I hope he's not really back, though. I can't stand him.
Re: so apparently I'm about to ragequit Sherlock (SPOILERS S3E3 in the comments)
Also BAMF and sassy John gives me life. Martin Freeman was amazing this episode.
Re: so apparently I'm about to ragequit Sherlock (SPOILERS S3E3 in the comments)
Re: so apparently I'm about to ragequit Sherlock (SPOILERS S3E3 in the comments)
Re: so apparently I'm about to ragequit Sherlock (SPOILERS S3E3 in the comments)
Re: so apparently I'm about to ragequit Sherlock (SPOILERS S3E3 in the comments)
(Anonymous) 2014-01-12 10:38 pm (UTC)(link)But yeah not seeing him at all would be a nice change.
update
Re: update
(Anonymous) 2014-01-12 10:53 pm (UTC)(link)Re: update
Re: so apparently I'm about to ragequit Sherlock (SPOILERS S3E3 in the comments)
(Anonymous) 2014-01-12 10:56 pm (UTC)(link)That he wasn't in this season was the main thing I liked about it. O well I think I am just going to pretend it is some sort of plot by Watson to get Sherlock back.
Re: so apparently I'm about to ragequit Sherlock (SPOILERS S3E3 in the comments)
(Anonymous) 2014-01-12 11:01 pm (UTC)(link)Re: so apparently I'm about to ragequit Sherlock (SPOILERS S3E3 in the comments)
(Anonymous) 2014-01-12 11:10 pm (UTC)(link)