case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-03-29 03:59 pm

[ SECRET POST #2643 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2643 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 075 secrets from Secret Submission Post #378.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
rubbertea: fanart of lester nygaard from the fargo tv show (hugh how much did u pay for that shirt)

[personal profile] rubbertea 2014-03-29 08:16 pm (UTC)(link)
wait, people are making headcanons about real people? what the hell are they thinking?
i mean, it's okay to make headcanons and give personality traits to the robot personas (and personally i wouldn't even call it rpf), but there's a difference between personas and the real guys under the helmet. they literally created the robot thing because they wanted to avoid having their faces associated with their celebrity status, so idk, i find it kind of disrespectful to go against their wishes in such a way.
kaijinscendre: (Default)

[personal profile] kaijinscendre 2014-03-29 09:15 pm (UTC)(link)
I think headcanons are fine. They don't really affect anything. It is when you start to push your headcanons onto the actual people (bringing it up at cons, tweeting them about it, telling them they are actually bi and that it is terrible of them to keep it secret), that it becomes a problem.

(Anonymous) 2014-03-29 09:20 pm (UTC)(link)
...what did I just read...?
kaijinscendre: (Default)

[personal profile] kaijinscendre 2014-03-29 09:23 pm (UTC)(link)
An idiot emailing a member of Game Grumps telling him he is bi. He emails her back and says, No he is not. In later posts he emails her again telling her that is was rude and distasteful of her to posts the emails online.

(Anonymous) 2014-03-29 11:15 pm (UTC)(link)
...WOW...

(Anonymous) 2014-03-29 10:19 pm (UTC)(link)
Wow. What the fuck. Newfound respect for Arin for having the patience of a saint about the whole thing.

(Anonymous) 2014-03-29 09:19 pm (UTC)(link)
wait, people are making headcanons about real people? what the hell are they thinking?

Never ever ever search the Merlin tag on Tumblr. Trust me. Delusional does not even begin to describe it. (Seriously. We are talking SPN levels of tinhattery here.)
dreemyweird: (Default)

[personal profile] dreemyweird 2014-03-29 09:19 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm kind of two minds about it. In this particular case it does sound disrespectful, but in general, I think it depends on the kind of headcanon made. Like, saying "I think this guy is totally secretly shagging that guy" is pretty creepy, but saying "I like to think that randomname loves chocolate cookies" is more cute than disrespectful. And then there's the question of attitude, of course. And whether the headcanon is likely to be true or not.

I find that gender/sexuality headcanons about RL people (even historical figures) are always either dumb or intensely creepy just because it's that kind of topic.
rubbertea: fanart of lester nygaard from the fargo tv show (Default)

[personal profile] rubbertea 2014-03-29 09:29 pm (UTC)(link)
yeah, i don't mind the "thomas totally loves pepperoni pizza" headcanons, but as soon as gender and sexuality are involved i'm like "nooo go away" because it's so unbelievable creepy. i think speculation on the sexuality of historical figures is fine (as long as it doesn't pretend to be more than mere speculation) but when it comes to living, breathing people who could come across these posts at any time the first reaction i have is "nope nooope delete that post delete your blog and throw water on your keyboard".
dreemyweird: (Default)

[personal profile] dreemyweird 2014-03-29 09:37 pm (UTC)(link)
I also find (plausible) friendship headcanons far less creepy than romantic/sexual ones. Maybe because they're less invasive.
rubbertea: fanart of lester nygaard from the fargo tv show (Default)

[personal profile] rubbertea 2014-03-29 10:32 pm (UTC)(link)
yeah, it's still a bit invasive but friendship is a safer topic than romance/sex which most people are a lot more private about.

(Anonymous) 2014-03-29 11:17 pm (UTC)(link)
Also less common. As in, not even very common at all. :-P

(Anonymous) 2014-03-29 11:26 pm (UTC)(link)
why is it any creepier than contemplating which member of One Direction is dating which actress or something like that? Is it just because it's GAY? Because that is gross.

(Anonymous) 2014-03-29 11:47 pm (UTC)(link)
No, that's creepy too. Just because tabloids do it publicly doesn't make it less creepy.
greenvelvetcake: (Default)

[personal profile] greenvelvetcake 2014-03-30 01:46 am (UTC)(link)
Especially ones that, like kaijinscendre's post above, force an identity on someone "for the good of the community." It's like, you couldn't find a celebrity or promote a newcomer who actually identifies as such, you'd rather force someone into that role?

(Anonymous) 2014-03-30 12:24 am (UTC)(link)
What are "headcanons" anymore, even? I always thought that it meant "canons in your head" therefore things that you made up in your own little fantasy/fic land. But it really means things you think are real? I am seriously confused about that.

But yeah, I am agreeing with some below people. For certain things, it's okay to do things like headcanons, RPF shipping, tinhatting ONLY if you keep it strictly to yourself and your fandom space and not bug anyone else about it at all (that includes twitter/cons/TPTB for canon tinhatting, AND arguing with other fans who disagree.)

But I am never, ever going to stop judging people who say things about their sex lives. "Oh I bet ___ is a good lover." "I bet ___ and ___ have hot kinky sex after each show." "That's cum stains on his clothing!" I HATE YOU YOU CREEPY DISGUSTING PERVS THAT'S GROSS! Keep it to fanfic. ONLY FANFIC. So I don't have to read it!

Basically yeah. I think.

(Anonymous) 2014-03-30 02:01 am (UTC)(link)
Yes. Fans need to not post or tweet or message their significant ships to tell the people how much they KNOW or WANT them to be with someone sexually or belong with someone like a soulmate. Like no. I get it when there's a little fantasy going on and people can create crazy things via imagination (I do rpf myself but I keep it behind closed communities and don't advertise it or overthink it) but when you start obsessing about it and not seeing the reality, it's crossing the line.
There are things that just are not respectful no matter how hard fans try to justify their creepy actions.

For OP, some parts in fandoms are created to unleash the weirdest fantasies or are provoked and whether to stay or leave is a matter of knowing how far you really want to go and what's comfortable for you.

(Anonymous) 2014-03-30 01:45 am (UTC)(link)
You should check out KPop fandom sometimes, they have real golden moments.