Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-04-29 06:51 pm
[ SECRET POST #2674 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2674 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 044 secrets from Secret Submission Post #382.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
Personally, women acting like men in media bore the crap out of me. I want some femme in this bitch.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-04-29 11:14 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
Angie's Lara Croft comes in mind.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-04-30 12:19 am (UTC)(link)She didn't seem particularly butch to me at all.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
*rereads your comment* actually, I think you and I are saying the same thing. Also I 100% agree with your second part. I love me some physically badass characters (not just female ones), but I love variety too and the regocnition that multi-dimensional human beings with physical, emotional, mental, spiritual, etc. strengths and weaknesses and infinite variety, just like men.
no subject
Also, I hate the idea of "acting like men" because I disagree with the idea that there is such a thing. Women can have every sort of trait imaginable and they are still women.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-04-29 11:27 pm (UTC)(link)+1 to this.
no subject
I wasn't digging into that though, and I know I was unclear in my original statement. In my opinion, it can, a lot of the times, seem as though writers are trying to strip away any sort of stereotypical female traits just to have a "guy's girl" who men can relate to just to have them drool over and fantasize about them even more. I know that, even if they are written with that in mind, it is still up to me to view it differently. But the point I'm trying to make is that it bothers me when it encourages the airheads to be sexist and small minded about how a woman is supposed to act.
no subject
no subject
*The other part being I tend to do it naturally, and for a long time was like, "No, no, can't do that, have to have men in here..." and then stopped to think, "Why?" and realized that the co-protagonist/love interest in the book I have been revising for ages now... mostly because I've had a lot of trouble actually writing... actually should have been female from the get-go. So now my slightly effeminate male character is actually a butch lesbian and the cast is now full of queer characters, predominantly queer women!)
(And, hey, I have been seeing you around places forever, and we tend to agree on a lot of stuff and have similar interests. Would it be okay if I friended you, and if so, would you prefer here or LJ? :)
no subject
Its the same username on LJ. You can friend me here if you want, I'm just not sure if I've actually ever posted anything.
no subject
no subject
no subject
It has been awhile since that incident but LJ has basically said fuck you to anybody who doesn't like their new style... although, they have yet to release the "new" friends page, which they were saying they were going to do more than a year ago now, so maybe they're learning?
I was very glad when F!S moved, and part of it was due to the site change issue, along with... another site change issue that happened later, that I can't recall, that case basically just said, enough of this shit.
no subject
I was afraid that F!S would die down, but I'm glad it didn't mostly. I think it had something to do with the new comment page? That change did go into effect. I actually like some of the new things (like being able to easily add in html into comments), but some of the stuff didn't work well for F!S (like the no subject line).
Maybe they are learning. One can hope.
no subject
I know folks complain about there not being as many secrets, but I actually like where it is now. It's much easier to keep up with, and we don't show up on sf_d nearly as often (...which is how I actually found out about the community in the first place... I think something from that chixb4dix person, or whatever her name was).
I thought there were General Comments back on LJ too? Maybe just before the move? I really love it, as much if perhaps not more than the secrets, because it's nice to just chat with folks. And people seem to be nicer here on DW than back on LJ; I at least noticed a huge shift in the tone of the community, and I really love it.
And yes, we can hope.
no subject
I like the fewer secrets too. Although I don't like the whole "people who feel strongly about social justice issues are social justice warriors who don't actually really care" stuff that has a lot of tone-argument parts to it. There at least seemed to be a more even split on LJ, but it seems like some of the stronger social justice people left.
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-04-30 07:11 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
Uh, a whole lot. I get obsessive about a lot of things. MCU, Doctor Who, Star Wars, Star Trek, Tolkien stuff, Buffy, How I Met Your Mother, Grey's Anatomy (mostly just Callie/Arizona side of the fandom), Babylon 5, Stargate, Once Upon a Time, and Legend of the Seeker (mostly landcom though).
Also Harry Potter and Supernatural, but the Potter fandom has died out so I mostly read fics and I've only season season 1-6 and like seasons 1-5 of SPN so I'm not really in the fandom too much anymore.
I'd be into the Firefly fandom if I knew where to find it.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-04-30 01:58 am (UTC)(link)no subject