Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-05-07 07:03 pm
[ SECRET POST #2682 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2682 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 024 secrets from Secret Submission Post #383.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
Sorry, but I'm sick of people saying the fandom made them expect more from this ship and that "there's nothing there!"
no subject
2) People who think it's canon are delusional and that's who I was referring to. I have seen people who ship it go into full analyzation of 5 seconds as "proof" of their relationship. I casually ship it too but you have to admit there are some seriously delusional Sterek fans in the fandom. Period.
I didn't get into Teen Wolf for that reason. So I don't really care. You're not upsetting me. I got into it because my friend Nef said it was a shitty show I would love watching with her. She was right.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-05-07 11:33 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
Like, seriously, I've seen them talk about how Stiles looking up at Derek in a certain way while Derek was shoving him up against a wall proved that they were into each other.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-08 00:03 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-08 00:10 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-08 00:15 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-08 05:38 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
I'm usually able to let this stuff not bother me, but I see this reaction so often and I momentarily saw red. I'm not even angry, just resigned.
no subject
I get ya, my friend. I get ya. I hope this makes you feel better.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Haha, yeah, that got me into trouble/discussions a few times already. Because my definition is a lot different - examples for what I consider crack ships are Harry/Hogwarts, Snape/Giant Squid, or Stiles/his Jeep.
It would never occur to me to call Sterek a crack ship, because they are two actual characters on the same show who do sometimes interact with each other.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-05-07 11:31 pm (UTC)(link)But, as someone that gave TW a shot because of all the shouting about Sterek Moments and Feelings and this and that, I gotta say. For me, there really wasn't anything. And I went in looking for it. I would consider it a crack ship, and that is okay! I love crack ships!
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-05-08 01:34 am (UTC)(link)Sterek is not a crack ship. Definitely not. I can see the appeal of why people like it. It has basis for people to ship it. But that has nothing to do with something being "between" them in the canon. You can literally say that about any pair of people who interact if you look really hard. You like a pair because they would be hot, or you like how they interact/their personalities would go together in a hypothetical romance. But that has nothing to do with canon because it's in your head/fanon.
I absolutely am horrid at communicating, sorry!
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-05-08 02:21 am (UTC)(link)"translate that to romantic chemistry" is a really good definition of shipping. It's not there romantically in the actual canons, but it's easy to translate. Haha
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-05-07 11:55 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-05-07 11:57 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-05-08 12:07 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-05-08 12:09 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-08 06:45 (UTC) - Expandno subject
Not that a crack ship is bad. I like 'em. Keeps me young.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-05-08 12:06 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-05-08 02:00 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
OP
(Anonymous) 2014-05-08 03:11 am (UTC)(link)I guess I should have thought more about my wording because I didn't realize it would cause any arguments. :S
Re: OP
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-05-08 11:12 am (UTC)(link)no subject