case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-06-03 06:45 pm

[ SECRET POST #2709 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2709 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 041 secrets from Secret Submission Post #387.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

No fun allowed!

(Anonymous) 2014-06-03 11:29 pm (UTC)(link)
What's some harmless stuff your fandom loves/does but you absolutely hate?

Re: No fun allowed!

(Anonymous) 2014-06-03 11:33 pm (UTC)(link)
FLUFFY ROMANCE. I hate it so much. It's such a cheap cop out and vomit inducing. FFS.
intrigueing: (piper and trickster have no taste)

Re: No fun allowed!

[personal profile] intrigueing 2014-06-04 01:32 am (UTC)(link)
So much agreed. Vomit-inducing and cheap is the perfect way to phrase it. Why actually try to tease some sincerity out of relationships by exploring them when you can just slather some one-size-fits-all fluffy romance all over everything? *eyeroll*

What really gets me the most is when the people writing or reading the fluffy romance don't even seem to realize that it is fluffy romance, and thinks that it is in fact The Way The Show/Movie/Book Is Supposed To Be.

Re: No fun allowed!

(Anonymous) - 2014-06-04 21:32 (UTC) - Expand
rubbertea: fanart of lester nygaard from the fargo tv show (Default)

Re: No fun allowed!

[personal profile] rubbertea 2014-06-03 11:33 pm (UTC)(link)
photo manips. it harms my soul.

also, pokémon fandom, pokémon x and y have been out for months. please stop with the surrender jokes.

Re: No fun allowed!

(Anonymous) 2014-06-03 11:35 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes to photo manips. They always look so creepy and wrong.

Re: No fun allowed!

[personal profile] rubbertea - 2014-06-03 23:40 (UTC) - Expand

Re: No fun allowed!

[personal profile] writerserenyty - 2014-06-03 23:55 (UTC) - Expand

Re: No fun allowed!

(Anonymous) 2014-06-03 11:38 pm (UTC)(link)
The Pokémon fandom awful for running things into the ground. Like, yeah, I get it Espurr's seen some shit, Hoenn's filled with water and trumpets, and Professor Sycamore's the Frenchiest French to ever French. It's time to stop.

Re: No fun allowed!

[personal profile] rubbertea - 2014-06-03 23:43 (UTC) - Expand

Re: No fun allowed!

(Anonymous) - 2014-06-04 00:51 (UTC) - Expand

Re: No fun allowed!

[personal profile] rubbertea - 2014-06-04 09:26 (UTC) - Expand

Re: No fun allowed!

[personal profile] ryttu3k - 2014-06-04 06:12 (UTC) - Expand

Re: No fun allowed!

[personal profile] rubbertea - 2014-06-04 09:28 (UTC) - Expand

Re: No fun allowed!

[personal profile] ryttu3k - 2014-06-07 07:30 (UTC) - Expand
intrigueing: (buffy eww)

Re: No fun allowed!

[personal profile] intrigueing 2014-06-04 01:28 am (UTC)(link)
I die a little inside every time I see a photomanip. Or photorealistic porn fanart.
othellia: (Default)

Re: No fun allowed!

[personal profile] othellia 2014-06-04 03:26 am (UTC)(link)
But some of them (especially old HP ones) are so classic.

I still regret that I never saved this one Draco-as-a-centaur manip I found once on fandom wank.

Re: No fun allowed!

(Anonymous) - 2014-06-04 03:29 (UTC) - Expand

Re: No fun allowed!

[personal profile] othellia - 2014-06-04 03:45 (UTC) - Expand

Re: No fun allowed!

(Anonymous) - 2014-06-04 03:47 (UTC) - Expand

Re: No fun allowed!

(Anonymous) - 2014-06-04 07:39 (UTC) - Expand
riddian: (OMGNO)

Re: No fun allowed!

[personal profile] riddian 2014-06-04 03:29 am (UTC)(link)
I am sorry but this post reminded me of Mythagowood and now I can't stop laughing. If ever there were soul-harming manips...

Re: No fun allowed!

(Anonymous) 2014-06-04 10:29 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm reading that as "photo man nips"
ariakas: (Default)

Re: No fun allowed!

[personal profile] ariakas 2014-06-03 11:37 pm (UTC)(link)
There are so, so many Mary Sues. It's 99.99% of all het fic, and that's being generous, because I've never actually seen that 0.01% I just assume it must exist somewhere. The canon-character-only fans seem to avoid the Sue/Stu-writing fans, though, and the twain shall never meet, so there's not much drama.

Re: No fun allowed!

(Anonymous) 2014-06-03 11:53 pm (UTC)(link)
There's quite a lot of het fic that doesn't involve OCs or Mary Sues. But yeah, there's still a lot of fic with them. I just don't get it. I mean I get it, but publishing it for other people to read is a bit odd to me.

I keep my shameful, shameful Mary Sue adventures in my head. Where they should be kept.

Re: No fun allowed!

[personal profile] ariakas - 2014-06-03 23:57 (UTC) - Expand

Re: No fun allowed!

(Anonymous) - 2014-06-03 23:59 (UTC) - Expand

Re: No fun allowed!

[personal profile] ariakas - 2014-06-04 00:00 (UTC) - Expand

Re: No fun allowed!

(Anonymous) 2014-06-03 11:46 pm (UTC)(link)
Anything involving the word "domestic." I don't caaaaaare about your headcanon for who in your OTP makes dinner on what nights or who lets whom shower first.
intrigueing: (Default)

Re: No fun allowed!

[personal profile] intrigueing 2014-06-04 01:27 am (UTC)(link)
YES. I will backbutton the shit out of anything "domestic" -- not because I'm opposed to domestic-ness (I actually really like domestic-y scenes in canon...because they usually last about two minutes), but because fics do them in such smug vomity ways.
writerserenyty: (Default)

Re: No fun allowed!

[personal profile] writerserenyty 2014-06-03 11:56 pm (UTC)(link)
Whenever people ask the cast/crew/writers about shipping stuff or general fandom-y things. I don't want the cast to know what weird ships I have.
shortysc22: (Default)

Re: No fun allowed!

[personal profile] shortysc22 2014-06-04 12:38 am (UTC)(link)
Oh this is the worst! Or when people will tweet at the actors about fandom and ships, no please don't do that.

Then again, in my one fandom the actors will joke around with each other but it still gets uncomfortable when the crazy fans push.

Re: No fun allowed!

[personal profile] writerserenyty - 2014-06-04 00:44 (UTC) - Expand

Re: No fun allowed!

[personal profile] shortysc22 - 2014-06-04 01:01 (UTC) - Expand

Re: No fun allowed!

(Anonymous) 2014-06-04 12:51 am (UTC)(link)
This. So much this. Please, everyone, stop doing this thing. It's so embarrassing and horrible.
intrigueing: (happy nine)

Re: No fun allowed!

[personal profile] intrigueing 2014-06-04 02:15 am (UTC)(link)
I literally have never actually watched a single Q and A of this kind because I'm so afraid of the second-hand embarrassment.

Re: No fun allowed!

[personal profile] othellia - 2014-06-04 03:27 (UTC) - Expand

Re: No fun allowed!

[personal profile] cbrachyrhynchos 2014-06-04 12:02 am (UTC)(link)
Smushnames.

Re: No fun allowed!

(Anonymous) 2014-06-04 12:04 am (UTC)(link)
This, so fucking much. Most of them are just completely fucking terrible. They're not cute, so stop being lazy and type out the damn names of the characters.

Re: No fun allowed!

[personal profile] cbrachyrhynchos - 2014-06-04 00:04 (UTC) - Expand

Re: No fun allowed!

(Anonymous) - 2014-06-04 00:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: No fun allowed!

[personal profile] elaminator - 2014-06-04 00:30 (UTC) - Expand

Re: No fun allowed!

(Anonymous) - 2014-06-04 00:53 (UTC) - Expand

Re: No fun allowed!

[personal profile] elaminator - 2014-06-04 01:07 (UTC) - Expand

Re: No fun allowed!

[personal profile] nightscale - 2014-06-04 01:11 (UTC) - Expand

Re: No fun allowed!

[personal profile] elaminator - 2014-06-04 01:23 (UTC) - Expand

Re: No fun allowed!

[personal profile] nightscale - 2014-06-04 02:04 (UTC) - Expand

Re: No fun allowed!

[personal profile] elaminator - 2014-06-04 02:07 (UTC) - Expand
(reply from suspended user)

Re: No fun allowed!

[personal profile] elaminator - 2014-06-04 04:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: No fun allowed!

[personal profile] othellia - 2014-06-04 03:31 (UTC) - Expand

Re: No fun allowed!

[personal profile] elaminator - 2014-06-04 03:48 (UTC) - Expand

Re: No fun allowed!

[personal profile] othellia - 2014-06-04 04:28 (UTC) - Expand

Re: No fun allowed!

[personal profile] ryttu3k - 2014-06-04 06:15 (UTC) - Expand

Re: No fun allowed!

(Anonymous) - 2014-06-04 00:52 (UTC) - Expand

Re: No fun allowed!

(Anonymous) - 2014-06-04 01:47 (UTC) - Expand

Re: No fun allowed!

[personal profile] queerwolf - 2014-06-04 02:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: No fun allowed!

[personal profile] th0rns_n_r0ses - 2014-06-04 02:38 (UTC) - Expand

Re: No fun allowed!

(Anonymous) - 2014-06-04 03:36 (UTC) - Expand
(reply from suspended user)

Re: No fun allowed!

(Anonymous) - 2014-06-04 11:25 (UTC) - Expand
mekkio: (Default)

Re: No fun allowed!

[personal profile] mekkio 2014-06-04 12:06 am (UTC)(link)
Gender/racebending casting. Because 99% of the time, the casting is all about looks and not about whether or not that actor fits that role acting-wise. And it's frustrating to read people's cast and go, "Idris Elba AGAIN? He would be horrible in that role. No where in his filmography says that he would be any good in that sort of billing."

I am a firm believer that actors can't be switched out like tires and you can get the same result, or in this case performance from them. Each actor has spent years, if not decades working on their craft as to make their performances uniquely their own. Like you wouldn't hire Tom Cruise to play a Paul Giamatti role even though they are both white. You can't switch one actor for another. But some how for gender/racebender casters, it's perfectly fine to shove any non-white actor in any role.

Re: No fun allowed!

[personal profile] inthecorner - 2014-06-04 00:24 (UTC) - Expand

Re: No fun allowed!

(Anonymous) - 2014-06-04 00:54 (UTC) - Expand

Re: No fun allowed!

[personal profile] cushlamochree - 2014-06-04 02:53 (UTC) - Expand

Re: No fun allowed!

(Anonymous) - 2014-06-04 01:16 (UTC) - Expand

Re: No fun allowed!

(Anonymous) - 2014-06-04 09:28 (UTC) - Expand
feotakahari: (Default)

Re: No fun allowed!

[personal profile] feotakahari 2014-06-04 12:52 am (UTC)(link)
Crossover fanfics that are only crossovers because an OC is magically trapped inside and bonded to a costume of somebody. (For instance, it's a "Final Fantasy crossover" if someone's stuck in a Gilgamesh costume.) Apparently there's a club for people who write them?

Actually, pointless crossovers, period. They always get a lot of likes from people who're fans of the other work, but most of them have random events in place of a plot and no conflict to speak of.
slashgirl: (Default)

Re: No fun allowed!

[personal profile] slashgirl 2014-06-04 01:09 am (UTC)(link)
Jeremy Clarkson. The number of otherwise sane-appearing people who like and even lust after him' boggles my mind.

Oh, wait, you said "harmless".
(reply from suspended user)
pantswarrior: Laguna scratches his head. (huh?)

Re: No fun allowed!

[personal profile] pantswarrior 2014-06-04 02:32 am (UTC)(link)
In one particular fandom, I stopped going to the kink meme because of all the genderswap.

I don't object to genderswap in general, I like reinventing characters in genderswap fan art, and have even considered doing cosplay of a couple genderbent characters (with some thought put into it and personalities taken into account, as opposed to, y'know, wearing a bikini/miniskirt and halter top in the character's color scheme and my own hair and calling it a genderbend cosplay) - but holy crap, I was having trouble finding fic that WASN'T genderswap for at least one character for awhile, and that's when genderswap fic starts to irritate me.

(Particularly because I'm apparently non-gendered enough that gender makes zero difference to me and I have never seen a point in genderswap fic because it doesn't make sense to me unless they're written as exactly the same except with different parts.)

Re: No fun allowed!

(Anonymous) 2014-06-04 07:41 am (UTC)(link)
High school AUs. *hatehatehatehatehate*