Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-10-03 06:44 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
[ SECRET POST #2831 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2831 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

[The Great British Bake Off]
__________________________________________________
02.

[Trailer Park Boys]
__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

[Gotham, Ugly Betty]
__________________________________________________
06.

[Outlander]
__________________________________________________
07.

[Short Circuit]
__________________________________________________
08.

[Agents of SHIELD]
__________________________________________________
09.

[Are You Being Served?]
__________________________________________________
10.

[Avengers]
__________________________________________________
11.

[Gotham]
__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15. [ SPOILERS for Valiant Hearts; The Great War ]

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #404.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-10-04 12:07 am (UTC)(link)no subject
Maybe they do, but I ain't getting that kind of read from it. You really make it sound like this is some intense con job, when it's really just conversation and moving on to other topics after inviting someone to open up.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-10-04 12:24 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-10-04 12:43 am (UTC)(link)no subject
Because really, is someone being more interested in you over your work a negative?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-10-04 01:01 am (UTC)(link)Ooooookay.
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-10-04 01:08 am (UTC)(link)It is when they're being dishonest about it, because then how am I supposed to trust that they're even interested in me as a friend when our very first conversation starts off on a false pretense? Don't ask me SPECIFICALLY to talk about things you're not interested in just so you can change the subject. Be direct and ask me about stuff YOU want to talk about. If we hit it off? Great. If not? That means we probably shouldn't have been friends in the first place, so nothing of value is lost.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-10-04 01:13 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-10-04 01:14 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-10-04 01:38 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-10-04 09:47 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-10-04 13:32 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-10-04 17:04 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2014-10-04 09:40 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-10-04 01:41 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-10-04 01:11 am (UTC)(link)no subject
I figure OP is the former, they don't care one way or another about OCs, but they have no problem discussing them because it gets the other person excited and talking and opens the door to a mutual relationship. Which I think is totally okay.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-10-04 01:22 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-10-05 06:23 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
It's an actual thing to separate your like of a person with their work. I'm not talking about that celebrity thing people, but actual friendship. If that's still your dealbreaker, at least you know your boundaries and what you're comfortable with.
no subject
I keep repeating that I agree that liking a person and liking their stuff are two separate things, I just don't think it's healthy to actively hate their stuff and still encourage discussion of it. I'm not sure if we're actually disagreeing if you don't think that's healthy, either.
no subject
Apologies if it seems that I've skimmed over it since I wasn't being clear. It probably depends on what each person is getting out of consistently fake interest, but let's go with malicious and manipulative liar friend; of course not. Are they offering an ear to them whenever that author needs a sounding board? Maybe okay, but rather desperate. Seriously though, I don't think anything in the secret implies an active hatred, nor anything remotely endearing really, which is what everyone seems to be jumping to.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-10-04 02:43 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-10-04 02:19 am (UTC)(link)no subject
No more no less afaik, unless you want to throw examples at me and see if I'm going to move a goalpost or whatever.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-10-04 02:53 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-10-04 03:32 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-10-04 03:46 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-10-04 20:06 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-10-04 03:42 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-10-04 03:47 (UTC) - Expand